Select Page

Biden discovers he has another granddaughter

Biden discovers he has another granddaughter

It appears that this holiday season, the Bidens are warming up to Navy Joan Roberts as a (Quasi?) member of the family.  That is a notable difference over the course of the past five years.  A quick review of the history may be informative.

In 2018, Lunden Roberts gave birth to a daughter and named her Navy Joan Roberts.  Nothing newsworthy EXCEPT that she claimed it was President Biden’s son, Hunter, who fathered the child when Lunden was only 16 years old.

Initially, Hunter treated little Navy like his laptop – firmly denying that it was his. It was only after Lunden sued Hunter for child support in 2019 that a DNA test confirmed his paternity.  Despite that fact, Grandpa Biden did not recognize the existence of his granddaughter until 2023 – five years later.

Back in 2022, three years after Navy’s birth, Grandpa Biden had this to say in a SmartLess podcast.  Referring to his grandchildren, the President said: “They’re crazy about me and I’m crazy about them.  Every single day, I contact every one of my grandchildren.”  Every one of them except Navy.

For four years, Joe and Jill Biden referred to their SIX grandchildren – omitting any reference to little Navy.  There was no seventh stocking hung by the mantle with care during those intervening Christmases.  There were no birthday celebrations or gifts.  Navy was not considered part of the Biden family for most of her life.  She was nothing more than a point of contention in a bitter child support lawsuit between Lunden and Hunter.

Even after conceding that Navy was his daughter in the face of the DNA evidence, Hunter insisted that he could not afford to meet the demands of child support.  He simply did not have the money.

Now let us put that in context.  At the same time Hunter was pleading poverty, recent criminal indictments show him spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on fancy cars, expensive hotels, hookers, porn sites and illegal drugs – among other things.  And the senior Bidens are multimillionaires.  Money was not an issue.

But alas!  It appears that the Biden family – Hunter, Joe and Jill – are accepting Navy as a Biden – if not a full-fledged call-every-day grandchild.  I have not heard of the stocking count on the White House mantel this season, but Grandpa Joe made his first public statement regarding Navy last year, saying “Our son Hunter and Navy’s mother, Lunden, are working together to foster a relationship that is in the best interests of their daughter, preserving her privacy as much as possible going forward.”

Incidentally Hunter was either lucky or smart to have hooked up with a 16-year-old girl in Arkansas where the statutory rape age is 13.  Not so lucky in that Lunden did not get an abortion.  I bet Hunter would have found the money for that.

The Bidens refer to this as a private family affair, but when you are President of the United States, virtually everything about you is fodder for the press.  The birth of Navy – and the responses of the Bidens – has been a major news story on virtually every media platform for five years.  It is because a significant part of every public figure is character.  The Navy issue undermines Biden’s well-crafted image as strong loving family man.  It also reinforces his propensity to maintain a separation between what he says and what he does.

I relate to this portion of the Biden story because of my own experience in bringing into our family a teenager who had fathered a child.  There was the question of paternity – settled by a DNA test.  There was the issue of child support.  But there were no delays in making that little one part of our family in every way – celebrating holidays and birthday, and occasional family trips.. 

I just see a coldness and a political calculus in how the Bidens are dealing with a similar situation even as they portray themselves otherwise.  I see a President in whom politics trumps almost all other considerations.  Just my opinion.  And it is looking exclusively at Biden without any what-about comparisons – positive or negative – to President Trump. 

Regardless of the past, I sincerely hope that the Bidens, Lunden Roberts and little Navy will have a very merry Christmas.

So, there ‘tis.

About The Author

Larry Horist

So,there‘tis… The opinions, perspectives and analyses of Larry Horist Larry Horist is a businessman, conservative writer and political strategist with an extensive background in economics and public policy. Clients of his consulting firm have included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman. He has served as a consultant to the Nixon White House and travelled the country as a spokesman for President Reagan’s economic reforms. He has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress. Horist has lectured and taught courses at numerous colleges and universities, including Harvard, Northwestern, DePaul universities, Hope College and his alma mater, Knox College. He has been a guest on hundreds of public affairs talk shows, and hosted his own program, “Chicago In Sight,” on WIND radio. Horist was a one-time candidate for mayor of Chicago and served as Executive Director of the City Club of Chicago, where he led a successful two-year campaign to save the historic Chicago Theatre from the wrecking ball. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries appear frequently on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He is praised by readers for his style, substance and sense of humor. According to one reader, Horist is the “new Charles Krauthammer.” He is actively semi-retired in Boca Raton, Florida where he devotes his time to writing. So, there ‘tis is Horist’s signature sign off.

23 Comments

  1. Dan tyree

    What happened? Did Hunter take a shit?

    • doug

      He certainly did — and then sold it for $500,000 to an operative of the “big guy.”

    • doug

      The latest update on that subject:

      Indeed he did. He kept 50% for himself, gave 10% to the “big guy” and sold the rest to a multiple-personality not-see twoll on this comment board.

      Everyone seems pleased with the outcome. Who could ask for more?

      • frank Stetson

        Doug posts a complete lie and fabrication.

        BUSTED for lack of support.

  2. frank Stetson

    It’s very disappointing to see anyone demeaned based on his family, especially underage kids. Horist attempts to read the mind and delve into his soul mining bad character traits making him unfit for office. Horist knows nothing about the Biden family. This comes from a guy who states: I will vote against him in the primary, but will vote for the WORST CHARACTER ever in US history for President. Ditto from me big guy. And Biden’s issues don’t even come close to the guy Horist supports. There is no comparison needed.

    Then he slams the guy’s actions, character, while boring us with a personal anecdote, a personal anecdote for which he smears any of his readers that do the same. As if he’s the same as Biden.

    He conveniently avoids the truth, the whole truth, because it fits not his spin narrative.

    Biden has been asked, and answered the question. He waited until Hunter said OK after the custody court case concluded to establish communication with mother and child and has amplified that over time: case closed.

    This kid is the daughter of a stripper from Arkansas he met in DC that he does not remember given his drug days. She was in DC for the money, period. Because no Arkansas stripping jobs? Or searching for another type of gold mine? And with unprotected sex with a quasi-celebrity, she found it. It’s his, they dealt with money, custody, etc. in court, he paid and the ex-stripper immediately went on a nice ritzy vacation. There’s pics. So be it and that’s it. I do not see a giant character flaw in that on the part of Joe and Jill Biden. Hunter, that’s another question, but IMO, we know his flawed character, and he’s on his second and last chance because of it.

    Meanwhile….. Horist waxes on to his personal comparison:
    – Was there a custody battle going on?
    – Did Dad approve or did Horist go over his head?
    – Who paid child support? The kid? Horist? What was the issue
    – Did they establish a college fund for the kid? Give it art?
    – Did Horist adopt the teenage Dad and really bring him into the family
    – Does Dad have a drug problem, was he doing sex, drugs, and rock n roll
    – Where are father and son today, how did it all work out?

    Honestly, I don’t and shouldn’t care. Don’t answer or feel like you should. It’s your business. Like the Biden’s, this is no business of mine, I am sure, like Biden, Horist is doing the best he can. Yet he felt obliged to open the kimono and that opens it up for queries because he believes this proves Joe’s character flaw making him unfit to be President.
    Why? Because the guy is President from the party opposing Horist’s party.

    Why does Trump’s character not make him unfit? Why should we not compare? Because Horist loves those policies so WTF does character mean.

    The mother in this case is on record saying glowing things about Hunter and Navy has too. Shame on anyone sticking their nose in with a potential effect of making things worse. You can look it up. It may even be on the court records.
    Hunter is a loser druggie cad who made mistakes, is supposedly clean, but IMO, pretty high risk for making more mistakes. Biden acting at his son’s discretion, has established some level of communication with mother and daughter, and the Horist’s of the world should dig in other compost piles for their does of daily shit.

    Leave the family alone, especially the kid who cannot benefit from reading crap like this.

    Or let’s look at Barron.

    • doug

      LOL. Humper’s such a stand-up guy. It’s the COCAINE that made him do terrible things. Per Flip Wilson, the DEVIL made him do it.

      Lessee: Horist says Humper escaped rape charges by essentially raping a girl who was barely a teen IN ARKANSAS. And that’s true.

      Tom+FrankIncest claims the 13-year-old was boinked in Wash, D.C. because of her vast conniving and business wiles. And somehow she met and seduced Humper despite his godly, caring, humanitarian heart.

      To put matters in perspective, Jeffrey Epstein was charged with violating 17-year-olds. Humper homed in on 13-year-olds. Who knows how many Humper actually exploited; we can be confident that if any others got pregnant, and if they refused to be aborted, there’d be more publicly recognized Humper victims no matter how annoying that would be to the our resident not-see cult leader.

      Too bad Horist didn’t delve a little deeper in the circumstances involving Humper’s fertilization of a girl of seventh-grade age.

      At the time his “love child” was conceived, Humper was literally seducing his brother Beau’s widow, or “dating” her, as apologists say.

      Looks a bit like a pattern, doesn’t it? Humper likes to “date” 7th-grade girls and newly widowed women with deep vulnerabilities he can exploit. We know, too, that Groper Joe was on board with Humper “dating” his sister-in-law.

      If that makes you think that you’ve heard of someone else with that innovative “dating” strategy, you’re probably reminded of Groper Joe, whose female targets of choice are little girls with ages in single digits or very low double digits.

      But let’s not make Humper the fall guy for his family. There’s considerably more at play. For example, Humper’s sister ruminated painfully in her diary over whether her sexual problems could have been driven by the intimate showers she and her daddy took in her youth.

      Makes you wonder which girl will have suffered more from the misfortune of having a father named Bidet. My money says both will be at risk of suicide. And may no more children be born with the Bidet pervershun (intentionally misspelled) gene.

      Whatever the circumstances, count on other perrvs standing up for the Bidet “men.” It’s hardly a surprise that their loudest admirers would include faces of not-seeism. Not-sees aren’t exactly respecters of truth. When they say that Groper Joe established “communication” with his smallest granddaughter right after Humper’s paternity was proven, laugh that off. It’s pure whimsy. Not-see whimsy, to be sure, but still whimsy. CNN even admitted on May 2 that for 4 years after Humper’s paternity was established, not one Bidet tried to contact Navy — their own blood relation — or the child’s mother.

      In actuality, Groper Joe ignored tiny Navy Roberts until she met his personal notion of the proper age of consent, which in his mulch-headed mind is pre-school.

      When did the gropemeister finally publicly acknowledge her as a family member? This past fall, after being spanked hard by the New York Times for the Bidets’ shoddy treatment of an inconvenient baby.

      That’s one diff between the Trumps and the Bidets: One tells locker-room tales of female conquests while the other is serious about molestation.

      Read this excuse for prose and decide whether anyone with 2 brain cells could produce it: “This kid (Navy) is the daughter of a stripper from Arkansas he (Humper) met in DC that he does not remember given his drug days. She was in DC for the money, period. Because no Arkansas stripping jobs? Or searching for another type of gold mine?”

      This is how not-sees excuse the Holocaust. Imagine harpooning a 13-year-old girl for being forced into the sex industry and then being delivered to the deviantt (purposeful misspelling) likes of Humper Bidet. Blaming the victim is what not-sees do. Quid Pro Groper Joe even blamed other people for being bitten at least 20 times (according to CNN) by Groper Joe’s “pet” dogs in the White House.

      )o:>
      )o:>
      )o:>

      Changing direction briefly. I’ve been on a mission to expose mincing, jack-booted not-seeboys on this sliver of the ‘Net. I’ve exposed FrankIncest and his alter-ego by cornering them on their sympathy for the KKKlan, for the German National Socialist, for their denial about racism existing in the U.S. and for the worst promulgator for that insidious form of collectivism.

      But mostly they run from their own answers, dodging questions and challenges with unmatched desperation. I make my questions as clear and easy to answer as possible. Here’s one that stands precious little chance of being answered, but let’s try, just for fun:

      Would they have supported the Allies or the Axis powers in World War II? And beyond WW II, in which foreign wars would they have supported the United States, since the USA was created?

      Easy peasy!

      • doug

        I need to correct a mistake. In the post above, filed minutes ago, I reported Lunden Roberts’ age when she “dated” Humper Bidet as 13, having misread Larry Horist’s commentary. I couldn’t find her actual age anywhere on the Web, obviously owing to news outlets’ nearly unanimous tactic of suppressing that detail for viewers and readers.

        The error doesn’t materially alter anything I wrote, though it does soften some edges. The principals remain a highly privileged, large-living man about 50 years old and lacking all morals being thrown together with a young teen-ager of 9th or 10th grade.

      • FRANK STETSON

        Why would you say that about tom and I? Do you really think that is funny OR are you just trying to hurt someone who disagrees with you? Some man you are.

        Margaret Thatcher once said something that fits Doug to a T: “I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particular wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not one single political argument left.” Which leads me to Robin Williams of all people who said: “Politically, I don’t care what party you’re from, offer a point of view and let’s see what happens and really debate the issues rather than use personal attacks. Really talk about it, talk about immigration, talk about education, talk about pollution.”

        Doug is the first, perhaps if he grows a pair, he can try the second. But he can’t. He can’t get it up to meet in the arena, argue the facts, argue his point, without demeaning and degrading his adversary without merit. Trash talk is not debate.

        To answer your question, as I have a number of times to the sound of crickets from you: “Dougie, Until you respond to the request to prove ANY of the insinuations you have made in the other thread about Tom, about Me, I will not respond to this trash. You were asked, politely, without name calling to simply support a number of your asinine, unfounded, unproven, POS statements.”
        As I said when I penned it:

        WE WILL HEAR CRICKETS. Crickets and deflection I should add.

        That is the only answer I gave and the only answer you will get from me until you enter the arena, toe the line, and let’s discuss……..something….

        Back on point for this little gem, you said that the stripper from Arkansas working in DC was 13, rape charges, all sorts of hokum. That is wrong, as you noted without apology.

        You allude to my overlooking Hunter’s actions because of brain fog to drugs. I did not and do not, you are fabricating again.

        As far as all your other allegations, that’s what they are. Joe’s alleged sex abuse stories are just fairy tales until you prove them in court as your man, Donald J Trump has been adjudicated as a sexual abuser with the judge adding upon appeal, of a digital rape nature. That is, Don got her alone, slammed her up against the wall and pinned her, reached up under her dress, down under her panties, and shoved his fat fingers up into her vagina penetrating her. A jury of peers heard the evidence and concluded he was liable with the judge tossing the digital rape on top in court records as Don stupidly appealed the rape charge as defamation. That’s not braggadocio, that’s not locker room talk. Joe has never been even taken to court I believe. You got nothing but rumor. Perhaps lies.

        You could be right about suicide although it appears they are happy as clams with the settlement, college fund, even art work. As I noted, and you did not follow up, here’s Lunden right after the settlement this year: *https://radaronline.com/p/hunter-biden-lunden-roberts-vacation-child-support-settlement/* There’s lots more pics out there, they like the press, they look very happy.

        “In actuality, Groper Joe ignored tiny Navy Roberts until ….” While I don’t agree to the trash at the end of this, I do agree that Joe stayed mum too long and was outed by the liberal Maureen Dowd in the NYT. Perhaps your “spanked” is appropriate. You can look up her piece that most feel moved Joe to action, independent of what he said. *https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/08/opinion/hunter-biden-child.html*

        “That’s one diff between the Trumps and the Bidets: One tells locker-room tales of female conquests while the other is serious about molestation.” Factually, you are dead wrong. One has allegations, the other has been adjudicated as a sexual abuser of the digital rape variety. Case closed on that one big guy and Reade ain’t never going to court on this in the future. Nor any pat on the head.

        AS to my quote you excerpted: spot on, I nailed it. “This kid (Navy) is the daughter of a stripper from Arkansas he met in DC that he does not remember given his drug days. She was in DC for the money, period. Because no Arkansas stripping jobs? Or searching for another type of gold mine?”

        That is true as far as what happened and what Hunter said. IMO, it excuses nothing. I could have added that, but figured folks already understood that I do not condone ANY of Hunter’s misdeeds. But I do believe in the American ideal of a second chance. I do not give him much hope of succeeding, but I give him the chance. Again, that does not condone his misdeeds and he should answer for any and all laws broken. As far as your ire, suck it.

        And then you’re once again off to the holocaust, NAZI’s (although you seem afraid to use the word, wonder why?), and blaming the victim. Again, I stated the facts and posed a question. I did not blame. Strippers are people and some people do tawdry things for money. Ask Hunter. But if you don’t believe that somebody just might, just might get pregnant for a payoff as is marriage, money, or both ——– you have not opened your eyes. Not saying that’s her, just saying that’s the circumstances, and sometimes that’s what happens. Does not matter, takes two to tango, and stoned or not —- not excuse.

        Joe’s dog is just funny, thanks for the reminder.

        That’s my take, you have your answer, feel free to stay on point and discuss more, bark some more like a Dog at the moon, or just bugger off. Your choice.

        Hope that clarifies.

        • Tom

          All very good points Frank. I agree. I am not very knowledgeable on family law but there may have been legal reasons why Joe Biden had to keep silent about the little girl Navy. If there are such reasons, it would be good if he cleared them up, but that is his choice. I will give him wide range to handle it all they way he feels necessary. It seems to me to be a family issue that was put into the public limelight for political advantage. I am glad for the child’s sake that the issue has settled down. I hope the family is healing and doing well.

          As a father, what I think is most sad is that one day that child will be older, be able to read and comprehend what she reads, and will come upon viscous internet articles about her father, mother, family, and the beginning of her life. And she will have friends and classmates who might come upon articles of her family and her too. I hope she will get good training on how to handle all of that potential vitriol and bullying. As a former teacher I have seen what happens when one child finds a police log notice on the internet or a story about another student’s father who is in jail. They truly pay for the sins of the father. And in some cases, they never stop having to pay thanks to the bullies and character assassin low life’s that choose to either trash up their past constantly (often like in the case of Navy she did not choose her path) or they make false claims without a shred evidence.

          • frank Stetson

            I agree and I take JB at his word and perhaps HB made the decision on lawyers advise. It was testy for a bit but now everyone seems happy although I don’t think I would take the art as an asset. Then again, I am a peace-nik again having dumped the defense at a high — not the high, but a high :>) Seems to be coming up today so perhaps I screwed the pooch for 22% in two years, leaving 2 points on the table. But I have my new strike price and is it tumbles, I will be back in for probably the fifth time now.

            I think the college fund was brilliant as opportunity for Navy and being sure Mom can’t dip. Somehow, that vacation in the tropics did not look like child support funding, but then again, everyone deserves a break. She’s getting around $240k a year and is working at her family gun store. I am glad she’s working.

            For PBP-ers that want to stay up-to-date, her instragram page is not shy, for her or her child. That’s a mistake, but it’s a free world.

            I will add one thing: HB’s current photos seem to show a ($($( of a lot of miles on that face. The stuff may speed up life, but you sure pay the piper. Tommy Lee Jones laughs at that face.

          • larry Horist

            Tom … Okay, you are not familiar with family law. From my own experiences, I can tell you that there is not reason for the family to have reached out to Navy during the court proceedings. There is no reason for them to deny or conceal her existence. It is clear from their own statements and actions that the Bidens did not consider Navy a part of their family for several years.

            You concern for Navy is commendable, but you have idea — not even an inkling — how she will grow up and respond the the facts of her birth and early life. Kids have all sorts of parents — good ones, abusive ones,, parents who were famous or infamous — and most grow up to be Weill adjusted. The idea that everyone is a snowflake traumatized by every problem in their life is a problem with today’s culture. The reality is that Navy was birthed by a reprobate of a father and a much too young mother. That Biden’s family fame resulted in a lot of public coverage. That does not doom her to a life in psychiatric therapy.

            Navy is a news story because of the Joe Biden. If he was Joe Blow, there would be no coverage of Navy. In fact, if he was Joe Blow, there would be no coverage of Hunter. Attempting to shame me for writing about Navy in terms of his grandparents is ridiculous — and does not create a scintilla of shame in me. Joe, Hunter and Navy are all newsworthy. Otherwise there would not be thousands of stories about them on television, radio, newspapers, online and at the watercooler.

            In terms of Frank, nothing is ever the issue unless he can use it to slam me. It is that jealously and obsession thing. You like his style, that is on you. As a person who likes to present himself as intelligent and objective, your fawning over Frank’s constant ranks and attacks undermines that image. But that is also on you. Mach nichts to me.

          • doug

            I had intended to move on to other spaces until seeing the “viscous” post above and literally laughing out loud.

            “Viscous” articles, Laugh out LLLLLOOOUUUUDDDDDD!

            Maybe Tom&FrankIncest meant “Disqus.” Does he/she/it know what this multiple-personality twoll really wants? Other than maybe statues of Himmler, Goebbels and Goering to add to his collection?

            Oh, yeah. Li’l Klaus likes other posters to talk about issues while he spews personal diatribes under a passel of handles.

            What happens when REAL substance is aimed his way? Such as whether Klaus thinks the Third Reich or America and her allies were the morally superior combatants in WW II? Such as whether he judges the United States worthy of support in any foreign wars in her 2 1/2 centuries or whether he would have banded together with her enemies? Such as who some of the worst racists in U.S. history have been? Such as pinpointing any examples of disagreement between him/her and the KKKlan or not-see Germany?

            Hmmmmm. He takes the Fifth. And what is the Fifth? It’s an admission that event though facts and truth would incriminate you, the Constitution forbids the government from forcing you to admit your culpability as long as you invoke that amendment.

            Now that’s law 101, and no one but not-sees and other organ-grinder monkeys would dispute it with a straight face.

            Which doesn’t stop Klaus here (not to be confused with Santa Claus) from raising a suggestion that Humper Bidet and/or his child-groping pervy father could have been legally constrained from publicly admitting that Humper impregnated a 16-year-old at the same time he was bedding other sex industry babes as well as his late brother Beau’s grieving widow would have violated the law in some fashion.

            Which law might that have been? LOLOLLOLOLolololoLOLOLOL. Look that one up in Public Acts LMAO, volume 2017.

            * Snicker *

            This not-see twoll lies more than Goebbels.

            )o:>
            )o:>
            )o:>

            What’s particularly hilarious here is the mashing up of complaints like this — “they make false claims without a shred evidence” while suggesting that the Bidets were probably under legal prohibition with respect to confirming the truth about Humper.

            Notice the Goebbelsian device of not formally claiming the Bidets were gagged by the law but using language shaped to leave an impression such an imaginary law existed.

            Such antics may indeed work satisfactorily with brainwashed woke rubes, but the population of such Borg bobbleheads on this comment board ain’t exactly overwhelming.

            Let’s sign off with a reminder of an issue that dwarfs the Bidet krime klan in importance.

            What happens when REAL substance is thrown to Tom&FrankIncest? Such as whether the Third Reich or America and her allies were the morally superior combatants in WW II? Such as whether Klaus would have judged the United States to be worthy of support in any foreign war in her 2 1/2 centuries or whether he would have banded together with her enemies? Such as who some of the worst racists in U.S. history have been? Such as pinpointing any examples of disagreement between him/her and the KKKlan or not-see Germany?

        • doug

          Good gravy, as the chef said.

          Good thing for me that I can predict not-see weather. I expected fuhrer-loving tears to fall today, but it’s a good thing I brought along galoshes, a rainhat and my overcoat this morning. I never expected THIS fierce of a cloudburst.

          )o:>
          )o:>

          Why is it that not-sees always play the victim? The local Third Reich celebrant who’s been swishing around these premises in his half-soaked lederhosen — I think his monikers include Frank or Tom or Klaus — has been involuntarily admitted to the psycho ward for his own protection.

          He went into the deep end after having to take the Fifth on such questions as whether he would have sided with Hitler’s stormtroopers against the U.S. in WW II and whether he would denounce the worst racists in United States history and if he could specify any foreign wars in which he wouldn’t have helped our enemies.

          Over the years, I’ve outed literally hundreds of not-sees through the use of this and other tactics. And each of them acts as if some kind of injustice has been perpetrated on him, her or it.

          Anyone who understands not-see psychology — which is identical to wokie psychology — can do the same thing.

          While practicing and enjoying the experience and art of not-see smackdowns, I still don’t understand what twisted ideation turns them into the sewer rats they are — low-lifes who cultivate mountains of malevolence — dung beetles who feed on hatred, extreme envy and piles of bile.

          But when push comes to shove, the civilized world had to engage with the Axis Powers without understanding how and why they morphed into peee-swilling commode lickers. They were committed enemies, and they had to be flushed, no differently than Swastika Slurper Tom+FrankIncest.

          As for the rest of the swill emitted by the aforementioned white supremacists on his teary cyber-missive, his claims wander between incomprehensibility and nonsense so asinine that they can be punctured with plastic spoon.

          Tom&FrankIncest claims to want debate, Except his boundless racism, his feckless hatred of the United States, his antipathy toward Judeo-Christianity, his lies, his personal feces-flinging, his stomach-turning posturing, his endless cheapening of our mother tongue and his physical visage, including that horridly misshapen cranial topper (imagine putting that on your Christmas tree!) are off-limits.

          The language-butchering deserves a particular rebuke. If I knew this misfit’s contact information, I’d seek a federal court order to forbid him (or her) (or it) from further assaulting proper English. I’d demand that the ruling contained a proviso that if he attempted to skirt the central prohibition, he’d be required to swim under supervision to Ukraine and never be permitted to leave.

          • Frank stetson

            Still have not proved any of your lies

            But tell us more and why the English major can’t spell NAZI?

            And keep crying. Cry us a a river

          • doug

            Responding to Tom+FrankIncest+Klaus+Mustafa below, since I couldn’t find a “reply” button above.

            We’re all overcome with anticipation, with our faces pressed against our computer screens, for answers that were not and will not be supplied by multiple personality not-seeboy Tom+FrankIncest.

            Such as whether the Third Reich or America and her allies were the morally superior combatants in WW II?

            Such as whether Klaus would have judged the United States to be worthy of support in any foreign war in her 2 1/2 centuries or whether he would have banded together with her enemies?

            Such as who some of the worst racists in U.S. history have been?

            Such as pinpointing any examples of disagreement between him/her and the KKKlan or not-see Germany?

            And such as explaining why he flees these and similar questions he’s choked over for a very long time.

            WAIT!

            I just got a text message from the twoll. Says he doesn’t have time to answer the questions, lest he arrive late at the scheduled Jewish cemetery desecration, synagogue defacing and cross burning at Little Bavaria.

            And he hasn’t even donned his jackboots yet.

  3. doug

    Like father, like son.

    Or, to say it differently, the misfit Bidet doesn’t fall far from the tree.

  4. Tom

    Yes it was very lucky for Hunter that he dd not do his misdeed in many other states where the bar is higher than 13. And I do agree on the morbid nature of Hunter claiming he can afford the support schedule recommended payment based on income.

    Yes you and your family definitely handled a similar situation much differently than the Bidens. I certainly wish Joe and Hunter would have handled their situation much differently. There may be many reasons for all of this. I am not an expert in family law, nor in estate planning law. There could be legal reasons why Joe Biden had to keep silent about the little girl Navy. HOWEVER, if there are such reasons, it would be good if he cleared them up, but that is his choice. My feeling is that it is a family issue and not an issue of character or integrity that says much at all because there could be legal reasons dealing with family law, estate planning, etc. as to why he did what he did. I do not think this issue will politically impact him at all.

    As a father, what I think is most sad is that one day that child will be older, be able to read and comprehend what she reads, and will come upon viscous internet articles about her father, mother, family, and the beginning of her life. And she will have friends and classmates who might come upon articles of her family and her too. I hope she will get good training on how to handle all of that potential vitriol and bullying. As a former teacher I have seen what happens when one child finds a police log notice on the internet story about another student’s father who is in jail. They miss their fathers, and they get very sad if forced to discuss it. They truly pay for the sins of the father. And in some cases, they never stop having to pay thanks to the bullies and character assassin low life’s that choose to either trash up their past constantly (often like in the case of Navy she did not choose her path) or they make false claims without a shred evidence.

    It is with great pleasure that I join you in your hope that the Bidens, Lunden Roberts and little Navy will have a very merry Christmas. I also hope you and Frank have a very merry Christmas as well.

    MERRY CHRISTMAS LARRY!

    MERRY CHRISTMAS FRANK!

    MERRY CHRISTMAS DARRELL & DARREN

    MERRY CHRISTMAS MIKE f

    • frank Stetson

      Who was 13 or 16 or what???? You can’t strip in DC at 16?

      And who goes to a strip club at Dupont? Gay clubs more like it….. wait, I looked it up, it’s around 18th and M. Hey, I have been there!!! But I prefer Camelot. It’s a show bar and I like that better. Funny story, just met with ITC, won our case against Asia, and we’re heading out and the top lawyer jams his hand in the elevator door and says: “where you going boys……” He was really uptight straight laced and the story gets really funny but the punch line has to do with tips….. Of course, the funniest stripper story was the bachelor’s party I helped plan where myself and Humble Paul interviewed the talent. Mary tells us she’s moving back home to FL and HPaul says: “do your parents know…..” to which she rips out: “I don’t dance on the dining room table son…..” She was getting her masters…. But, when you work long hours, full tux, kosher catering with a nude spot, seedy, a block away, you get familiar with the folks. Nothing better than going in at midnight and hearing the wave of “TUXEDO” cross the room. Then I might pour a beer on it — salvation army issue. Nice folks though. As nice as everywhere else.

      When you grow up outside DC, you learn —- Georgetown is for tourons (moron and tourist); 20th and M for city folk, and Dupont —- pretty gay. 14th hookers. Now there’s a funny story too, but another time.

      Oh my terrible youth which I gave up at 21 and have been making up for every since. People often ask me why I don;t drink to which I reply: “I do drink. I’m just waiting for you all to catch up.” May be true about the Irish. But put the Slovak on top and oh my betty.

      Good night and happy holidays to you and everyone you mentioned plus Joe G, AC, and Daniel Oliver. May Santa fulfill all your wishes with Peace on Earth and WAR for Larry (chillax, just ribbing ya, you ole hawk, you know I agree on that)

  5. Darren

    Hunter is a Shit Show.
    The Biden’s must be very very proud!

  6. vladimir

    Protect the child from globalist puppet, god worshiping, chester biden .

  7. JPop

    Poor kid…

  8. AC

    Larry, when you turned on the Biden family, Joe, Jill, Hunter, and all, I thought your commentary sunk to the bottom. Your acolytes tend to go lower still, feeding on each other, rightfully jabbing at you, and generally ignoring your disgusting tainted opinion’s pretext of giving intelligent insight after doing honest investigative research.
    Instead, this time your obsession with Biden has driven you beyond vile muck raking tactics to off the rails mental twilight zone territory.
    You are mean, Mr Grinch. A graceless wretch who can only have this tabloid level tripe posted on PBP. A reputable journalist would not, could not put this many sentence together with such base intent and come away believing the whole of it is justifiable.
    Most certainly no one, not even you, can find they are better afterwards when reading your bunk.
    At one time you professed no hate toward anyone. I contend you give yourself a pass when Joe Biden and his family are made your punching bag victims.
    Those of us who read your stuff on a fairly regular basis, know where you stand politically. It’s no secret where your allegiance lies Your vengeance unreserved and on display, you direct at all you see as the so called left.
    If it’s not hate that motivates your composition in words that cause smart caring folks severe intestinal discomfort and stimulate oral release, vomit spewing. What else is it?
    One sees the length to which you have already taken. Any further steps involve taking out a hit contract on Hunter, Joe, or Jill.
    So far, your lasting legacy is centered your intense all consuming hatred for all left democrat voting Americans. Your estimation of over half the population is based on you belief in your own superiority in all matters. Without one exception. This superiority includes the current POTUS and his kinfolk.

    • larry Horist

      AC … And you sir, appear to be a senile semiliterate old man. What you say has no meaning. What you write matters not to me, and doubt your grabby old rants have any meaning to almost anyone. You can count your readership on one hand. So what is your purpose in your long often incoherent attacks? If it makes you feel better — have at it.