Study Finding High Death Rate among Vaccinated Infants Gets Censored
What would the vaccine industry do without its censorship wing in the academic publishing world? What if people realized that vaccinated babies have twice the risk of dying in the next few months than those who are left unvaccinated? That is exactly what a scientific study found; and guess what happened next – it got yanked!
On January 15, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) reported that a research study by two of its scientists found a significantly higher mortality rate for infants who are vaccinated in the second month of their life. Vaccinated infants of that age had between 29% and 74% higher risk of dying in the third month of their life than unvaccinated infants of the same age.
The study titled “Increased Mortality Associated with 2-Month Old Infant Vaccinations” was authored by Dr. Karl Jablonowski and Dr. Brian Hooker. Based on data from the Louisiana Department of Health, it found that the more recommended vaccines the infants were administered at 2 months old, the greater their chances of death within a month. And this was the worst if the infants were black and/or female. The study’s abstract says:
Compared collectively, children who received all 6 recommended 2-month vaccines were 68% (68% for blacks and 112% for females) more likely to die in their 3rd month.
Since the study showed the risk to infants’ life associated directly with vaccination, mainstream media had no interest in reporting on it. A few less known publications such as Principia Scientific International reported on the study’s publication in early January. But the research and its authors were dealt a blow when the online science publisher of the research in question Preprints.org suddenly removed it from its website on January 14.
The study’s co-author Karl Jablonowski called the retraction of the paper an act of censorship. CHD cited him commenting:
“There are 318 members of the Advisory Board for Preprints. Not a single one of them has published on vaccine safety. Not a single one of them has published on infant mortality. Not a single one of them would have been chosen to peer-review our article. Its retraction, therefore, cannot be a peer-reviewed nor a scientific decision.”
The notable side of this retraction is the absence of any scientific basis for the study’s retraction. As CHD was told by the publisher, the study was retracted because “the content poses risks to the general public.” In other words, it was based on the personal opinion of the editorial team instead of any specific flaw in data or methodology or other aspect of the research itself.
To nobody’s surprise, the pharma-serving mainstream media ignored the news of the study’s censorship just like it had done to the study itself. Thanks to a few fair and balanced news sources like Just The News that reported on this censorship so that it wasn’t entirely pushed in darkness. Imagine the enthusiasm of media if the same study had found the same high risk of death but for the unvaccinated.
An article claiming that a study showing a high death rate of infants was censored, is second on your list behind a dog food add, and then the it says that RFK is proven WRITE instead of RIGHT.
To begin: who do you trust more: the medical-scientific community which concludes this study, and it’s 2011 precursor are bunk OR a Pakistani Muslim (not sure, but most Pakistani’s are) transplant to the US known for accusing much US institutions being corrupt.
This crap has been proposed and knocked firmly down since 2011.
Definitely a Pakistani Muslim.
COVID showed us the medical orgs care more about money than they do saving lives. Soldiers are constantly being experimented on with experimental vaccines especially when entering service and when deploying to combat zones. Saves vaccine companies millions and the soldier gets to go to the VA when he gets out for the negative reactions from the vaccines.
Sometimes I wonder how low this guy can go. This disinformation can kill babies.
Never ceases to amaze that this guy attempts to pass a study that was first discounted in 2011 by everyone AND now is recast as new info since they updated the same bad data out to 2024. Remember, there is no study here; there is an assessment of data collected by Louisiana. It’s always a first question when people use one study to result in another study the first one was not intended for. This data was collected by Louisiana from 2013 to 2024; that’s 11 years. Do you really think Louisiana was consistent in their methodologies for over a decade: no changes? Those are just tip o the iceberg problems when you use one study to make up a second study. And why the second study often gets tossed. But for Dempsey to deny the previous version existed while trying to pass this one off as new news: does he really think you are that stupid?
In the real world, studies suggest that vaccination may even reduce the risk of SIDS. Dempsey misses that little factoid, supported by science, a word he cannot spell.
The misconception often arises because the peak age for SIDS (1 to 4 months) coincides with the time when babies receive their first set of vaccinations. However, this is a correlation in timing, not causation.
Scientific consensus, backed by decades of large-scale research, indicates that vaccines do not cause sudden infant death.
Reports of increased mortality following 2-month vaccinations typically stem from a coincidence in timing or flawed data analysis.
Most initial vaccines are administered between 2 and 4 months of age. This coincides with the peak age for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) whether or not vaccines are administered. Multiple studies suggest that vaccinated infants may actually have a 50% lower risk of SIDS compared to unvaccinated infants. Just like measles is a disease of the unvaccinated; that’s how good and safe the vaccine is. Since the 1990s, while the number of recommended vaccines has increased, the rate of SIDS in the U.S. has dropped by more than 50%. Global data shows that expanded vaccine access has reduced overall infant mortality by roughly 40%.
This data analysis, aka study, is a 2025 preprint, preliminary work, not peer-reviewed, regarding Louisiana death records, claiming a 68% higher mortality for vaccinated 2-month-olds. This paper has not undergone peer review and contradicts established safety data from the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink, which found no such association. This is supported by NIH and CDC as well as most experts, which Dempsey is not; he’s a poet.
The withdrawn study that Dempsey wants you to believe so you can better kill children is similar to a 2011 paper by the same lead authors who have been heavily criticized for serious statistical and methodological flaws, including inappropriate data exclusion and selective sampling, which led to their flawed conclusions. They are recycling since Dempsey is buying.
In summary, the scientific evidence indicates that routine infant vaccinations are safe and effective in preventing serious diseases and do not increase mortality risk. CDC agrees, NIH agrees, most medical experts agree. Listen to Dempsey at your kid’s risk. Remember, these idiots suggest measles vaccine harm; we can see the terrible results of that unsupported thinking with our own eyes: now South Carolina has mass outbreaks. All unvaccinated.
BUSTED
Dunger I thought democrats were all about killing babies.
No surprises again. The vaccine mafia is the right term for these corporate serial killers and the censorship complex tops it off. Numerous studies have been censored and pulled from the s-called journals after they exposed the useless and deadly shots. Any site or journal that publishes a study and pulls it has no credibility. CHD has done some good work in exposing these vermin. HHS under RFK has done some reforms but not enough to dismantle the mafia. The only thing parents can do to break free from this medical slavery is say no and get to homeschooling kids if no exemptions are allowed.
The anti-vaxers would be funny except their actions, or lack thereof, are dangerous to others, especially young children and seniors, for no good reason. They are a public risk for harm. If they could just do it without harming others, great. They can’t.
Single handily they have brought back measles; yet cannot find anyone harmed by the measles vaccine. At least scientifically.
Under Trump, in 2025, the US set a measles record with deaths, 2,267 cases, and 244 or 11% of cases wind up in the hospital. 20% hospitalization if very young, ah, what a gift of health education from the parents. No reported harms from the measles vaccine in 2025. About 94% of all infections are of the unvaccinated; the vaccinated represent of 4% breakthrough and mostly milder cases.
Under Trump, we set a measles record not seen in 30 years and 25 years since eradicated due to vaccinations. No massive adverse effects noted on the vaccine.
Takes a few weeks post vaccination to gain immunity. There is a 4% vaccine breakthrough, but vaccinated breakthrough cases are usually less severe. Plus, during outbreaks, many jump to be vaccinated and catch the disease post vaccination but pre immunization. Just like people used to blame the flu vaccine for causing the flu when they had it before they got the shot or immunity from said shot.
Given the knowledge that the vaccine can end this, now, in 2026 we have our first outbreak in SC, led again by the unvaccinated who go around infecting all they contact. SC stresses it’s just one county, Washington state, North Carolina, and California have linked cases to SC. SC exposed folks in Kentucky at a large NYE Youth Conference at a Hyatt and in Georgia and Texas busy travel centers and even an Embassy Suites and a hospital in FL. The anti-vaxing fun just goes on and on. They don’t even have an exact location for the conference. SC has outbreaks in maternity centers, urgent care centers, hospitals, the 12K person BMW plant, the Michelin plant.
The SC outbreak is huge, serious, and will get worse.
Another 2026 outbreak hits a FL college near Naples. Started with a few, next day a dozen, two days out 20. FL has seen this before, like in Broward, and is jumping on it with free vaccine clinics from the DeSantis government. I wish them the best of luck since they did not lock own the campus I think. One kids with an infected roommate noted he’s safe, he went home. Yeah, that will work. FL is on this, I wish them success in their attempts. I loved my time in Naples, airboats, sunsets on the Gulf on a bigger boat, and one fine hotel. I stood in the place Al Roker went down during a hurricane, priceless.
So far, in 2026, anti-vaxers have a total of 588 measle infections and so we should top Trump’s record in 2025 during 2026. Two months in and we are 25% of the way to GOAT — two-peat. Thank you anti-vaxers for putting so many into the hospital. Teachable moment for kids, for sure. Life altering memory for zero profit. Brilliant!
The only good news in this is that the medical community that anti-vaxers shun, once realizing the shitstorm anti-vaxers created, are all over the anti-vaxer caused disease resurgence from the ashes and have avoided any deaths so far after the initial three with what seemed a surprise attack that should never have happened except for lack of a vaccine.
Similarly, this could be ended in a month if anti-vaxers had a brain and got the vaccine. I think they need like 94% take for herd immunity and it’s one shot for life. If you think you might have gotten as a child, if you are of a certain age, before the anti-vaxers got stupid, you are good. You can look up the years. If still not sure, a simple blood test can tell you.
Vaccines are one of the safest products on the planet. Period. The history of vaccines is nothing but success EXCEPT for those opting out. Trump should not be proud of his health record here.