10 Reasons Why We Know Covid originated at the Bio-Weapons Lab in Wuhan
The following are 10 verified points, some of have just recently come to light that Covid did indeed originate at that biological weapons lab in Wuhan, China. The information structure comes from this very well done Fox News article with references to a Wall Street Journal article. Each point is backed up by scientific data, government published reports and reporting from reputable sources.
Note that some of the supporting data were revealed in the last few weeks. Let me know in the discussion notes if you believe it is high time for Dr. Fauci and the U.S. government to come clean and put two and two together for the American people?
1. No animals in Wuhan were found to be infected.
China has claimed that this originated with bats and migrated to humans. But over 80,000 animals were tested in China and not one was infected with a pre-cursor virus.
2. No evidence of pre-epidemic infections
“There is no evidence of multiple animal-to-human transmissions,” said Dr. Steven Quay, a physician and founder of Atossa Therapeutics. It would be expected that 200 to 400 humans would have been infected from animal contact, based on the natural outbreak experiences of SARS. This supports the theory that it was developed in a lab, not a natural infection from animals.
3. The genetic fingerprint of Covid is unique, never seen in a natural coronavirus.
The virus has “a unique trigger on its surface called a furin cleavage site and a unique code in its genes for that site, called a CGG-CGG dimer.” This combination has never been seen before in a natural virus, pointing to a lab manipulated virus. Apparently, a “gene jockey” would put a “furin site” into a virus to make it more effective. There is some disagreement on this point among scientists.
4. Covid appears to have already been “optimized” to humans for high infection rates.
Usually, a virus has some ramp up time before it becomes especially virulent. However with Covid, it appears the virus was already 99.5% optimized to human cells.
“Such early optimization is unprecedented, and it suggests a long period of adaptation that predated its public spread,” Quay and Muller wrote in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. “Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved.”
Again, some scientists disagree will this assessment.
5. The Wuhan Institute of Virology has engaged in “gain of function” research.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is one of at most three places in the world conducting gain of function research and potential pandemic pathogen enhancement research on SARS-related coronaviruses prior to the pandemic, according to Richard Ebright, a professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University.
Make no mistake folks, this is a bio-weapons lab.
6. China has not cooperated, investigators have not had full access to the facility or data.
One would think that finding the cause of a worldwide pandemic would override any commercial or scientific priority considerations of a laboratory if all research was above board. In the U.S. or Europe, such a lab would be torn apart bit by bit.
But China has not cooperated, there has been no effort at transparency. Indeed data has been purposely withheld, and databases have gone offline.
Considering the multiple trillions in damage done to the world, this is unforgivable.
7. Lab Leaks are not as uncommon as people think. It should not have been dismissed so quickly at the beginning of the pandemic.
It may have been politically correct to postpone assigning blame in order to shift focus to dealing with the pandemic. We want to include China in the family of nations of course!
It appears that China engaged all possible propaganda assets to assure people that the protective protocols were impossible to breach. This was a fake narrative that the rest of the world was willing to believe.
8. Researchers at the Wuhan Institute became sick just prior to the outbreak
The State Department revealed that the “U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses.”
China had previously claimed that none of the researchers had been sick. Continued cover up.
9. The Wuhan Institute of Virology has conducted secret research for the Chines Military
“The WIV has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017,” the State Department fact sheet states. “The United States and other donors who funded or collaborated on civilian research at the WIV have a right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funding was diverted to secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.”
As I mentioned in the title of this article, The Wuhan Institute of Virology is a bio-weapons laboratory.
10. There was an orchestrated effort at NIH and others to shut down the bio leak theory.
As I mentoned in point #7, China appears to have pulled every propaganda asset together to shift blame away from the Wuhan Institute.
Dr. Fauci was given multiple indications that the virus may have originated in the Wuhan lab. Dr. Kristian Andersen, a noted virologist at the Scripps Lab, told Fauci some of COVID-19’s features look possibly engineered and the “genome is inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.”
Fauci organized a call with dozens of virologists worldwide . and the notes revealed that “suspicions of the lab leak theory were suppressed over concerns of how the public would react to news of possible Chinese government involvement. “
It is clear the NIH was influenced by both China and Dr. Fauci.
Are parts of this open to discussion among scientists and not rigorously proven to the point of scientific consensus? Sure.
Is this enough to convict China of covering up an accidental bio-lab accidental that has cause trillions of damage in a world pandemic, before a jury of their peers?
Absolutely, in the absences of China’s concerted propaganda and influence campaigns.