Select Page

Is Biden behind Trump’s court cases … as Trump says?

Is Biden behind Trump’s court cases … as Trump says?

Whenever it is reported that President Trump accuses President Biden of being behind all   those court cases as part of his political strategy, Democrats and their cronies in the press add the editorial caveat, “Of course, that is not true” as a matter of fact.

I have not seen any evidence that Biden has personally orchestrated the multi-pronged legal attack on Trump.  So, I have to conclude that Biden is not directing it personally.  But that leaves the question as to whether Biden is encouraging it or promoting it.  Actually, he is, by pointing to Trump’s being tied up in court – jokingly, of course.  But that is not wrong or unexpected.  That is exactly what an opposing candidate would do. 

So, there is no grand Democrat conspiracy to use – or abuse – the justice system to cripple Trump’s presidential campaign.  Right?  Maybe not.

The fact that Biden is not personally calling prosecutors to seek indictments against Trump, does not mean that there is not a broad conspiratorial strategy by Democrats in the justice system to pile on Trump as a campaign tactic.

We generally think of a conspiracy of a group of folks in a room plotting some sort of coordinated nefarious action.  But there are different kinds of conspiracies – and not all are criminal.  Some we call “strategic planning.”  But not all require direct coordination.  They are organic.

The latter is what I have called “conspiracies of self-interest.”  Members of an interest group – like a political party – independently undertaking actions obviously beneficial to the cause.  They operate independently, but with a common interest and a common goal.  This may be what we see in the Trump case – or cases.

Are a number of seemingly unconnected prosecutors acting inappropriately with a common political interest?  Are they abusing their power – bending the levers of justice to achieve partisan political advantage?  From what we do know, it can be reasonably argued that the answer is “yes.”

What makes that answer interesting is to what extent did Trump’s actions, statements, questionable credibility and general pugnacity provide the fodder for a conspiracy of self-interest among Democrat prosecutors and judges.  As President Nixon noted during the Watergate scandal that brought down his hither-to very popular presidency: “They stabbed us in the back, but we gave them the knife.”

What evidence is there to suggest a conspiracy of self-interest?

  1. First is the fact that in EVERY case, the prosecutor is a partisan Democrat office holder – mostly elected.  If the rule-of-law were in effect, one would expect the party affiliation to be so dramatically one-sided.
  2. The number of cases being brought by Democrat prosecutors at the federal, state and even county levels is staggering.  It looks like piling on.  Often when a case involves both federal and state one yields to the other.  Not in this case.
  3. Many of the cases seem overcharged.  In New York, the case involves a misdemeanor campaign finance violation — for which the statute of limitation has passed – elevated to a felony.  In Georgia, you have the casting of a wide net of indictments and using the RICO law – totally inappropriate for the alleged transgressions.  Even the so-called Documents Case seems to be aggressively prosecuted – especially in view of the Justice Department’s total pass on similar “crimes” by President Biden and Vice President Pence.  I have written in the past of my belief that the E. Jean Carroll case was pursued, decided and penalties set based less on facts and more on dislike of the defendant.
  4. It is not unreasonable to suggest political motivation based on the timing of the cases.  Virtually all of the alleged “crimes” were committed years ago, and all the trials wind up within months of each other – and at the height of the campaign season.
  5. At the same time, the request for speedy trials seems to be politically motivated.   Indictments and trials are never to be planned to impact on elections.  Yet, prosecutors have been falling all over each other to get all the trials started and over in 2024 — prior to the election.  These efforts fly in the face of judicial history that suggests a “normal” timeframe would have them all being resolved in 2025 or later.  The only explanation for this last-minute rush-to-judgment is the election – and the fear that Trump will win. That may explain why the prosecutors were slow to bring charges in the first place — and now eager to adjudicate them at warp speed.  It gives the appearance that it is all about influencing the election.
  6. And to some degree, there has been some level of coordination (conspiring?) among the prosecutors.  They have talked to each other in some cases.  And as widely reported in the media, there was an effort to coordinate the rollout of the cases for maximum impact on Trump and his campaign.
  7. In many cases against Trump and others associated with him, the indictments and the charges appear to be inconsistent and excessive to most similar cases.

The question is whether Trump is being treated fairly … without political bias or prosecutorial abuse.  There is certainly enough there there to not dismiss that possibility out of hand.  Much of the prosecution does not pass the smell test in my judgment.

To answer the headline question, I do not believe Biden is the master mind (no pun intended) behind the dizzying array of prosecutions, but he most certainly is the beneficiary.

(For those who are going to misrepresent this commentary as an exoneration of Trump and others, that is not what this commentary is about.  This commentary is not about alleged crimes and culpability, but only to question whether the process is fair or politically motivated.  That is the worthy question readers should decide for themselves.)

So, there ‘tis.

About The Author

Larry Horist

So, there ‘tis… The opinions, perspectives and analyses of businessman, conservative writer and political strategist Larry Horist. Larry has an extensive background in economics and public policy. For more than 40 years, he ran his own Chicago based consulting firm. His clients included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman. He has served as a consultant to the Nixon White House and travelled the country as a spokesman for President Reagan’s economic reforms. Larry professional emphasis has been on civil rights and education. He was consultant to both the Chicago and the Detroit boards of education, the Educational Choice Foundation, the Chicago Teachers Academy and the Chicago Academy for the Performing Arts. Larry has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress, and has lectured at colleges and universities, including Harvard, Northwestern and DePaul. He served as Executive Director of the City Club of Chicago, where he led a successful two-year campaign to save the historic Chicago Theatre from the wrecking ball. Larry has been a guest on hundreds of public affairs talk shows, and hosted his own program, “Chicago In Sight,” on WIND radio. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries have appeared on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He is praised by audiences for his style, substance and sense of humor. Larry retired from his consulting business to devote his time to writing. His books include a humorous look at collecting, “The Acrapulators’ Guide”, and a more serious history of the Democratic Party’s role in de facto institutional racism, “Who Put Blacks in That PLACE? -- The Long Sad History of the Democratic Party’s Oppression of Black Americans ... to This Day”. Larry currently lives in Boca Raton, Florida.

14 Comments

  1. Jim wampler

    It’s Biden’s commie handlers. Joe is too stupid to do anything.

  2. FRANK STETSON

    Yawn, sigh: many words, says nothing important. More Republican inuendo where not seeing something means something must be happening. Or, like Horist, even something worse is happening because nothing is happening. Republicans like Horist do a lot of that: innuendo and rumor, McCarthyism investigations, trial by media in the court of public opinion, rarely get them into an actual court, much less win when they do. Horist believes it’s not Biden personally orchestrating or directing “ the multi-pronged legal attack on Trump” where I guess he believes taking Trump to court is an attack. Or at least that’s what he says. Of course, what he says and what he thinks tend to differ. Excuse me: attack? Since when is following the law an “attack?” Gee, I got a speeding ticket in that legal “attack” speed trap at month’s end obviously targeting liberals because I live in a Red County. Or maybe I was just caught speeding because I was speeding.

    “The fact that Biden is not personally calling prosecutors to seek indictments against Trump, does not mean that there is not a broad conspiratorial strategy by Democrats in the justice system to pile on Trump as a campaign tactic.” I will let the minor point that the President does not tell DOJ who to indict. At least not until King Don gets back on his throne. And there’s about a million other things it also does not mean —-ALL OF WHICH do not lead therefore to something else that it therefore does mean as Horist postulates here. One needs proof for meaning, not the absence of proof to create meaning. One thing does not necessarily suggest another. Nothing suggests even less. So Biden NOT personally calling prosecutors (which we all agree NO President should ever do), does not lead to a broad conspiracy and never will. Matter of fact, it leads nowhere.
    Try: “The fact that Biden is not personally calling prosecutors to seek indictments against Trump, does not mean that” Trump did not do every single one of these crimes and millions more that he has not been indicted on yet just to bring in more donor money. Fact is we know he has made hundreds of millions because of the legal attack. Perhaps he planned it all just for the money.

    Nope, that’s some failed logic, just like Horist’s.

    Much weasel wording about the Horistian view of non-criminal conspiracies leading me to wonder if last night’s dinner collaboration was a Democratic conspiracy?

    Conclusion: ” Much of the prosecution does not pass the smell test in my judgment.” Well, goodie for you. That’s your opinion. You are not a lawyer and nothing in your resume indicates special knowledge in law.

    • Harry

      Laughable to say the least. Just wait. You will see.

  3. Patrick J King

    All self-respecting Americans hate Donald Trump and always have. You cite Democrats who are prosecuting him for his, frankly, stupid political maneuvers and business tactics, but the list of serious conservative Republicans who despise the man is like a who’s who in the Republican Party for thirty years: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Mitt Romney, to name three of the most prominent Republicans of the 21st Century. But look at all the Republicans who actually worked for him in his first failed administration who condemn him as incompetent now: John Bolton, H.R. Mac Masters, James Mattis, Rex Tillerson, John Kelly, all hand-picked by Trump for his cabinet, are outspoken in opposition to his ability to lead the country.

    Biden doesn’t need any dirty tricks to induce more than half the country to hate Donald Trump. The question is, why would “the Grand Old Party,” the party of Lincoln, choose such a polarizing personality to lead them forward now? Even if he does squeak his way into the presidency for a second term, the effects on the country will be disastrous. A huge number of people will oppose every movie he makes. It was clear from his first term that he does not understand how to motivate Congress. He apparently thinks he’s running for king and does not understand the difference between a despotic ruler and a president. The reason a president was chosen to lead the US rather than a king, a czar, or and emperor, was exactly so despots cannot take hold. I concede that the modern Republican Party does not have much to offer in the way of leadership but persisting with Donald Trump does not just bode badly for the United States, based on his past performance it bodes badly for the entire world. What the hell are you doing?

    • Jim wampler

      Patrick I see that you’re still kissing Biden’s commie ass

    • Harry

      Trump has already proven by his first administration, he beats Biden hands down ten fold. The Generals you mentioned? Just more members of the war mongers because of the kickbacks they receive.
      Don’t forget, many of the first people on his staff were recommended by a so called friend. Chris Christy and we all know what he is, except maybe you.

    • Harry

      Please list all Biden’s accomplishment that have put him at the bottom of the list of failed Presidents.

      And his hiding will lower that ratings even lower.

      • larry Horist

        Harry … His economic spending policies that created more inflation than jobs. He only focuses on union jobs. If he lets the Trump tax cut expire, he will be producing on of the biggest tax increasing — and it will hit the middle and lower classes. Biden is the top Democrat pushing woke social policies. his international programs have been a disaster for American national security. His left wing agenda is a danger to the Republic because it creates what the Founders feared most — a very powerful national government run by an elite establishment that is out of teach of the people’s accountability. Keep in mind that the legislative accomplishments he touts the most have been disastrous for the economy and for future generation. I could go chapter and verse, but that would take up more time than I have.

  4. Katherine

    Obomba, Clinton’s, soros, Bushs, all can’t get over Trump beating killary as President, Biden is no longer with us, and the mask is a actor puppet with obomba mouth.

  5. richard

    As far as I am concerned, Joe Biden is America’s number 1 ENEMY and should be put in prison for all his treasonous crimes against this GREAT COUNTRY.

  6. Darren

    Everything said above in comments is true if you Shred the Constitution.
    The Southern Democrat’s believed Robert E Lee was their savior
    during the civil war and still do.
    If the Constitution was being followed most of what is taking place would not be happening.
    Every President in the past whether Obama or Bush to sum extent gave the appearance
    of following the Constitution even though we all knew it was Bull Shit.
    In a world were laws have NO foundation it has become the Golden Rule.
    The one with the most Gold makes the Rules.
    Biden is to stupid to ever be as successful as Trump in Business so he resorts to extortion
    and pulls Clinton esk tactics when possible.
    Soros and other Billionaires whos tactics do not align with our democracy are being the benefactors
    as puppets around the country dance as they pull strings.
    When Trump was in office we had NO inflation, No wars, Low interest rates.
    Most people had Jobs, Food, a pleasant life!
    There is no money to be made by news media when this happens let alone any one caring about the news.
    Politicians have no power as no one cares to complain leaving them powerless and not in a position to extort moneys
    from people needing their help.
    The country and the world was better under Trump.
    Just imagine how great this country could have been if not for corrupt News medias and Bull Shit Russian stories.
    ONLY a FOOL would think at this point Biden omics is working.
    You should take a trip to Mexico and scream about your rights.
    That is what your thoughts are creating.
    Ass Holes!

  7. FRANK STETSON

    Horist calls this a legal attack made stronger by Democratic prosecutors. Two of the judges are Republican, Horist does not mention that fact. The SCOTUS is a Trump court, Horist does not mention that fact. SCOTUS has already moved at light speed to help Trump in CO case, but is slow boating the DC case potentially moving the trial until after the election. This looks like Bush v Gore on steroids where the SCOTUS is trying to elect the next President, or King, if they rule in his favor. Trump has the best legal team his extreme money allows him to buy. His followers give him millions to defend himself. He has more money than the prosecution – Horist does not mention that.

    Trump is allowed, verbally attack the judge, the jury, the court staff, the prosecution, all of their families, and he gets a slap on the wrist. He seems to treated much more “fairly” than you or I in this case. After a while, the judges still give him preferential treatment via weak gag orders that so far, Trump has violated without much recourse by the court. He’s getting a better deal than you or I would, for sure.

    And then Hoirst whines about the timing. Gee, a Trump case delayed. Must be the Democrats…. Yeah, wanna buy a bridge. Overcharging crimes. That should be good for Trump to get off easier, right? Prosecutors talking to each other. Gee, Trump not talking to his conspirators? I still have that bridge…. Prosecutors talk to each other all the time. It’s not only legal, but gee —- don’t you law and order types want the law to know as much as possible?

    What I think is unfair is that the American public will not hear all of these cases before the 2024 election. He said he didn’t do it, he’s got the best lawyers to make that case, what is he waiting for? He’s the smartest, the strongest, the bestest man in the entire world: is there some reason he wants to delay? Whatever could it be.

    Darren wants to return to the time of Trump; he ignores the HUGE loans, deficits, and debts without a GDP growth factor, therefore revenues to afford. Even without covid he was a failure who borrowed his way into Darren’s heart knowing Darren would be too happy with the results and too stupid to ask WHY? He’s not alone. Bidenomics, on the numbers is better, save one — Biden’s deficits are lower. Where it’s worse is inflation and it’s an easy argument to say Trump lit the kindling for that with all his free money and tax write-down giveaways. Frankly, given our debt, we all should suffer, pay more taxes, pay down the debt. For a few decades actually. You put Trump in and he will exponentially grown the debt, steal documents and the White House China, and escape to Mar A Loser leaving the US to hold the bag. He even suggests “writing down the debt,” like that has a snow ball’s chance in HELL of succeeding.

    Don’t worry Horist, no matter where the chips fall, you will always have your EJ Carrol logic that Trump “was pursued, decided and penalties set based less on facts and more on dislike of the defendant.” That will make you feel better when you cast your vote. Justify the lie all you like. The court papers will have the evidence and the jury will tell you what they thought, and that’s the thought that matters.

    You know he did it to EJ; you know he did it to other women. You know he defrauded his university students. You know he stole from his own charity. You diminish his liability for rape because people pick on him. You know that he paid hush money to what becomes basically a hooker. I think he did it to win the 2016 against Hillary after the Access Hollywood “grab em by the pussy” tapes dinged his Presidential aspirations. You know he took the documents and kept them when asked to return. No one can figure that one out — personal pleasure or future profits by sale? What was he thinking? You know his lawyers who pled guilty in Georgia think he’s guilty in Georgia. They will testify as to what they saw him do in that case, with or without the famous phone call which the public heard as well.

    And you want to blame Democratic overreach for his current legal issues? You feel that he who was once the most powerful man in the world, the owner of billions in wealth, a man who can make $3B in one day, you want us to feel he’s being picked on unfairly. That because prosecutors come from one party, it’s a trap? Judges are split. Juries include Republicans no doubt.

    Frankly, you may be right. But won’t going to court provide the answer? In the words of the prophet Mickey from Rocky II —– “what are we waiting for, take this……” Or Dirty Harry paraphrase: “You’re thinking “Did he charge me with 90 or 91 felonies?” Now to tell you the truth, I’ve forgotten myself in all this excitement. But being this is four indictments, from the fairest court system in the world, and it will blow your case out of the water, you’ve gotta ask yourself a question: “Do I feel lucky?” Well, do ya, punk?” If so, stand up, toe the line, let’s get it on in court. Before the election, so everyone knows before they pull that lever.

  8. Darren

    So every one will know what?
    The court is one sided.
    The rules are being bent all the way to the gag order.
    This trial only proves to what extent the Democrat’s will go to in
    Stopping their oponents.
    They know they can not cheat at the polls like the last election.
    So this is plan c.
    And for the entertainment of LOW intelligent Voters.
    Look at the people at CNN.
    enough said.

  9. AC

    Biden has no need to press DOJ or force of law in pursuit of Trump’s plethora of illegalities still within the committed offenses time limitations. Trump proves his culpability in conspiring to break some law with each time he opens his mouth. He can’t help himself. He can’t keep all his lies lined up straight. Conspiracies are rooted in lies, misinformation, and down right prevarications masquerading as fact.
    In this essay no references were cited as evidence of proof.
    The whole of this tale comes out of one person’s opinion and that being decidedly deep in partisan republican bunker territory. As that bias is fact in this case and information is generally known relative to Trump indictments but perceived from the Republican perspective. Whether or not Trump’s series of cases in the courts are being pursued fairly and judiciously from an objective guilty or innocent perspective does not depend on Biden’s opinion of Trump. It originates in one faith in the strength of our country’s judicial system. Opinions vary across a spectrum, low to high in confidence. Fact is, while a Democrat is in the WH Horist and his tribe line up on the skeptical red hued end of the spectrum. If a Republican happens to be POTUS, the jury is still out on the justice issue. Horist, like his so called conservative crowd, they keep a skeptic’s judgmental opinion regardless.
    I, too, live and have resided my whole life in the company of Republican Party color bearers. All are unabashedly proud flag wavers and Trump 2020 bumper sticker loyalists.
    Therefore, by brutal experience educated and learned from personal interactions, I do understand from a minority perspective of what Republicans’ opinions and conspiracy theories are made of.
    Included in the demographic of my area (red swamp) are the Christian Nationalist brand in the Party. And, that strain of the GOP hold the prize for the most righteous pompous Constitutional ignorant individuals whomever walked on American soil.