China Controlled Mogul Funding a $600 Million Leftist Influence Network
A Growing Investigation
The Justice Department has reportedly launched a federal grand jury investigation into one of the largest political funding networks in modern American history. At the center of the investigation is Neville Roy Singham, a wealthy former technology executive who sold his software consulting company, ThoughtWorks, for an estimated $785 million in 2017 before relocating to Shanghai, China.
According to Fox News Digital and subsequent reporting, federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York have issued grand jury subpoenas seeking bank records and financial documents as they investigate whether Singham, organizations connected to his network, or their leaders committed wire fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, or other financial crimes.
No criminal charges have been filed, and the grand jury investigation remains ongoing.
Who Is Neville Roy Singham?
Singham built his fortune by founding ThoughtWorks, a global information technology consulting company. Following the company’s sale in 2017, he reportedly shifted his attention away from business and toward political activism.
Today, Singham reportedly resides in Shanghai, where Fox News Digital documented his participation in conferences promoting what he described as a “new world order” aligned with Chinese President Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party. During one speech, Singham referred to the United States as a “fascist” nation while expressing support for China’s political direction.
Investigators also reported uncovering a 172 page document in which Singham allegedly outlined a political strategy inspired by Mao Zedong’s concept of a “people’s war.”
His wife, Jodie Evans, co-founded CodePink and has reportedly served on the boards of several organizations receiving funding connected to Singham. According to the reporting, Evans has also become part of the broader federal investigation.
Following Hundreds of Millions of Dollars
The sheer scale of the financial network identified by investigators is difficult to ignore.
According to Fox News Digital’s investigation, reporters mapped 223 financial transactions between 2017 and 2025 that moved approximately $591 million across five continents through 67 core organizations within what has become known as the Singham network. Those organizations reportedly partner with hundreds of additional groups worldwide, creating an extended network of roughly 2,000 organizations that Fox News Digital reported have amplified anti-U.S. and pro-China messaging.
According to the investigation, approximately $278 million of the total moved directly from Singham into organizations operating inside the United States before being redistributed through nonprofit organizations and activist groups.
The reported placement of the money allegedly began with three primary channels.
Approximately $164 million reportedly flowed into Mutod LLC.
More than $110 million reportedly passed through Goldman Sachs’ donor-advised philanthropy fund.
Another $3.5 million reportedly moved through Likewise Conceptions LLC.
According to investigators, those entities then distributed approximately $278 million among nonprofit organizations including the People’s Support Foundation, Justice and Education Fund, People’s Forum, Tricontinental Ltd., CodePink Women for Peace, and Breakthrough BT Media.
The investigation further alleges that these organizations redistributed at least another $223 million throughout a worldwide network of activist organizations, media operations, and political groups.
Federal Investigators Follow the Money
According to the reporting, prosecutors are examining what investigators commonly describe as placement, layering, and integration.
Placement involves introducing money into the financial system.
Layering involves moving money through multiple organizations and transactions that investigators believe may obscure its origin.
Integration refers to money ultimately emerging as grants, donations, nonprofit funding, or operational support.
Grand jury subpoenas reportedly seek banking records and financial documents that could determine whether those financial movements violated federal law.
Neither Singham nor many of the organizations identified in the reporting have responded to repeated requests for comment.
Questions About Foreign Influence
The investigation has also drawn attention from Congress.
House Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith argued that the funding network helped “sow discord” within the United States while raising broader concerns about foreign malign influence.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly met with Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon earlier this year to discuss the role of the firm’s donor-advised philanthropy fund in facilitating portions of the reported financial network. According to sources cited by Fox News Digital, Goldman Sachs later agreed to cooperate with investigators.
Goldman Sachs previously stated that it terminated its relationship with Singham in February 2024 following public scrutiny surrounding his donations.
The reported movement of nearly $600 million through hundreds of financial transactions represents one of the largest ideological influence campaigns directed at American political organizations in recent memory.
China is governed by the Chinese Communist Party, which exercises extensive authority over political, media, and business activity within the country. Influential individuals who choose to live and conduct political activities from within China cannot realistically separate those activities from the interests of the Chinese Communist Party. Whether Singham sincerely believes in his political activism or not, his activities ultimately advance Beijing’s strategic objectives.
In other words, he is under the direct control of the Chinese Communist Party.
The most significant figure is not simply the nearly $600 million reportedly moved through the network, but the infrastructure that money helped build. A network of approximately 2,000 affiliated organizations operating across five continents has the ability to shape political narratives, organize demonstrations, influence media coverage, and amplify ideological messaging on a global scale. The author believes this extends well beyond ordinary political philanthropy and represents an influence apparatus whose size should concern every American, regardless of political affiliation.
Whether prosecutors ultimately bring criminal charges remains to be seen. The grand jury process exists precisely to determine whether sufficient evidence exists to proceed.
What is already clear from the reporting is that investigators are examining an extraordinarily large financial network involving hundreds of millions of dollars, dozens of organizations, and political activity spanning multiple continents.
All under Chinese Communist control.
PB Editor: One can say this is the biggest known, but perhaps the Soros activities are broader. Soros has sent $18 billion to his nefarious charities.
This investigation has been going on since 2023.
The question is what and when are we going to stop it?
It happens both ways; Russia games you, China games us; Israel games all of us. You need to clean it all up for all foreign interests on a systemic and programmatic basis.
Fyi: Soros is a red herring. You got less than nothing unless contributions to the left are deemed illegal. You should be ashamed to fling such accusations so frivolously. Prove it or stfu.
$18 billion is a red herring?
Boca Joe: why don’t you do something about threats of violence on your site? Or the racism? Would the founders really ascribe to promoting racist and violent language as proof of freedom of speech? Why not have some rules. Tis your business if you so or don’t: the founders made sure of that. It’s you, not the 1st.
Yes, it’s $18B which you say went to “nefarious” charities. Since I am pretty darn sure some of this would be even seen by you as charitable and good; herring clue number one. Since the story, and you, offer no evidence that Soros attempted anything close to what China is doing, or any other foreign country is doing, which is the point of the story, herring clue number 2.
You are just piggybacking on China attempting to conflate it into liberals like Soros without either connection nor evidence of anything wrong. The “perhaps” and “probably” are your tell that you are pure freaking guessing while relying on the conservative stench of Soros to matrix your readers to make the connections that you can’t.
The only evidence is Soros gave 18b to charity and causes. And that has nothing to do with the story facts. Thus, red herring.
Some liberal charitable contributions go to great causes.
The good news is I can’t drag the Felon King into it. He is never charitable unless it’s with our money.
And once again Dunger is a lying bastard
And once again BenDunger can’t prove the spew he do. Does not even try. Because he tells lies and then blames the other guy. Lot of people here practice that.
He is a weak impotent name calling person of low class.
Dunger I attended church last Sunday and when the congregation stood to sing a hymn I noticed that the lady in front of me had her dress stuck in her butt crack. I pulled it out and she slapped me. I tried to put it back and she slapped me again. So I told her to wear her dress however she wants. Next time I’ll mind my own business.