Select Page

The Left’s War on Law and Order is a Descent into Urban Chaos

The Left’s War on Law and Order is a Descent into Urban Chaos

There was a time when the rule of law was the bedrock of American society. It was not a partisan concept. It was a shared value—an understanding that laws were meant to be enforced, criminals prosecuted, and citizens protected. But that era is fading fast, and nowhere is the decay more visible than in America’s major cities, where progressive policies have turned once-thriving communities into dystopian nightmares.

Let us be clear: this is not a natural decline. It is the result of deliberate political choices made by left-wing politicians who have embraced a dangerous ideology—one that sympathizes with and even romanticizes criminality, demonizes law enforcement, and treats victims as inconvenient footnotes in their social justice crusade.

The Decriminalization Delusion

In city after city, we have seen the same pattern. Progressive district attorneys refusing to prosecute crimes, bail reform laws releasing violent offenders back onto the streets, and city councils slashing police budgets in the name of equity. Armed police are being replaced with social workers. The results are predictable and devastating.

Take San Francisco, where shoplifting has been effectively legalized. Stores are closing, neighborhoods are hollowing out, and residents are fleeing. Or Chicago, where gang violence has become so normalized that weekends are measured by body counts. In New York, subway assaults and random attacks have surged, while the mayor insists the city is “safer than ever.”

This is not compassion. It is chaos masquerading as reform.

The Political Incentive to Ignore Crime

Why would any elected official tolerate this breakdown? The answer lies in the cynical calculus of identity politics. The modern left has built its power on grievance narratives—on the idea that America is irredeemably racist, oppressive, and unjust. In this worldview, criminals are not perpetrators but victims of systemic injustice. Law enforcement is not a public good but an instrument of oppression.

This narrative is politically useful. It mobilizes voters, fuels outrage and distracts from the left’s economic failures. But it comes at a steep cost — the safety and stability of our communities.

And let us not forget the media’s role. The same outlets that breathlessly report every misstep by police officers are conspicuously silent when it comes to the victims of violent crime—especially when those victims do not fit the preferred narrative. The press has become a propaganda arm of the left’s soft on crime policies, not a watchdog.

The Forgotten Victims

Progressives love to talk about “marginalized communities,” but they conveniently ignore the fact that those same communities suffer most from rising crime. When police retreat, it is not the wealthy elite who pay the price—it’s the single mother riding the bus at night, the elderly man walking to the corner store, the child caught in a crossfire.

These are the real victims of the left’s policies. And yet, their voices are drowned out by activists who claim to speak for them but live far from the consequences of their own rhetoric.

The Demonization of Law Enforcement

No commentary on this subject would be complete without addressing the relentless demonization of police officers. In the wake of George Floyd’s death, the left has launched a full-scale assault on law enforcement—painting every cop as a racist, every arrest as an act of brutality.

And even that pales in comparison to the left’s animosity toward immigration enforcement. Not only do those on the left ignore crimes by illegal aliens, they literally want to abandon all enforcement and disband the agencies commissioned to fight immigration-based crime – both Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol.

The result? Morale plummets. Recruitment dries up. Experienced officers retire early. And cities are left with understaffed, demoralized departments unable to respond to the public safety need – and American citizens suffer loss of property, injury and death.

Let me be blunt. The vast majority of police officers are honorable men and women who risk their lives daily to protect the public. Are there bad apples? Of course. But the idea that policing itself is inherently racist or corrupt is not just wrong—it’s dangerous.

The Path Forward

So, what is the solution? It starts with rejecting the false dichotomy that pits public safety against social justice. We can—and must—have both. That means:

  • Prosecuting crimes consistently and fairly.
  • Supporting law enforcement while holding them accountable.
  • Investing in community programs that prevent crime, not excuse it.
  • Supporting the federal agencies responsible for keeping borders secure
  • Restoring the rule of law as a non-negotiable foundation of civic life.

It also means electing leaders who prioritize results over ideology. The American people are not asking for utopia. Theyare asking for safety, stability, and sanity.

The left’s alliance with the criminal class is not just a policy failure—it’s a moral one. It reflects a worldview that has lost touch with reality, that values abstract theories over lived experience, and that treats law-abiding citizens as expendable. We must reject this madness. We must demand accountability. And we must restore the rule of law before it’s too late. Because without it, we are not a society—we are a jungle.

So, there ‘tis.

About The Author

Larry Horist

So, there ‘tis… The opinions, perspectives and analyses of businessman, conservative writer and political strategist Larry Horist. Larry has an extensive background in economics and public policy. For more than 40 years, he ran his own Chicago based consulting firm. His clients included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman. He has served as a consultant to the Nixon White House and travelled the country as a spokesman for President Reagan’s economic reforms. Larry professional emphasis has been on civil rights and education. He was consultant to both the Chicago and the Detroit boards of education, the Educational Choice Foundation, the Chicago Teachers Academy and the Chicago Academy for the Performing Arts. Larry has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress, and has lectured at colleges and universities, including Harvard, Northwestern and DePaul. He served as Executive Director of the City Club of Chicago, where he led a successful two-year campaign to save the historic Chicago Theatre from the wrecking ball. Larry has been a guest on hundreds of public affairs talk shows, and hosted his own program, “Chicago In Sight,” on WIND radio. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries have appeared on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He is praised by audiences for his style, substance and sense of humor. Larry retired from his consulting business to devote his time to writing. His books include a humorous look at collecting, “The Acrapulators’ Guide”, and a more serious history of the Democratic Party’s role in de facto institutional racism, “Who Put Blacks in That PLACE? -- The Long Sad History of the Democratic Party’s Oppression of Black Americans ... to This Day”. Larry currently lives in Boca Raton, Florida.

7 Comments

  1. frank danger

    Does Larry ever check his facts? Doesn’t he know the first rule of cities: what goes up, can come down, and vice-versa. And most likely will. Hasn’t he noticed the Florida expansion is tapering? Still good but significantly down. If he had checked…..

    This story reads like a Chinese fortune cookie where “between the sheets” is replaced by “then there was MAGA.”

    “There was a time when the rule of law was the bedrock of American society.” And then there was MAGA.
    “It was not a partisan concept. It was a shared value.” And then there was MAGA.
    “Let us be clear: this is not a natural decline.” And then there was MAGA.

    Larry’s got to know that cities were affected by covid. My relatives on the Cape outside of Boston recognized a 100% home price increase with almost 50% of home sales on the Cape being cash. You gots to know that Boston population fluctuated wildly too. And then office and retail space became vacant. Seemed pretty natural reaction to unnatural times. Wasn’t all that on Trump’s watch?
    Why didn’t Larry look? Is he that bogus to feel if he thinks it, it must be true? If he read it, it might have changed? Take my wife, take San Francisco, please: some current facts.

    2026 Year-to-Date Crime Trends (as of Feb 15, 2026)
    Total Gun Violence: Down 11%.
    Total Homicides: 6 YTD (4 resulting from a firearm), indicating a spike in early 2026.
    Shooting Incidents: Down 31%.
    Non-fatal Shooting Victims: Down 28%.
    Overall Crime Trend: Overall, Part 1 crimes are down by 39%.
    Key 2025 Crime Context (Prior Year)
    2025 Homicides: 28 (the lowest in over 70 years).
    Car Break-ins: Dropped by over 40%.
    Motor Vehicle Thefts: Fell 45%.

    BUSTED

    “Stores are closing, neighborhoods are hollowing out, and residents are fleeing.” It’s a fucking ghost town.
    From KM, trackers of business accommodations in San Fran. “The San Francisco retail market in 1Q 2026 shows signs of stabilization, with vacancy improving year-over-year and asking rents continuing to rise. While the construction pipeline remains inactive and the investment market experiences pricing declines, positive net absorption signals renewed tenant activity across key submarkets. Explore the full 1Q 2026 San Francisco retail market report for deeper insights into leasing patterns, pricing trends, and market performance.”

    1Q 2026 San Francisco Retail Market: Key Data Points
    • Vacancy Improves: Retail vacancy decreased to 6.0%, an 80 bps year-over-year decline.
    • Asking Rents Increase: Average asking rent rose to $35.06/SF per year, up 5.89% YOY.
    • No Active Construction Pipeline: Under-construction space remained at 0. SF, unchanged from prior periods.
    • Sales Pricing Softens: Average sales price dropped to $388/SF, a 25.38% YOY decrease.
    • Net Absorption Positive: Net absorption reached 90,029 SF, indicating improved tenant demand.
    • No New Deliveries: Construction deliveries totaled 0 SF, compared to 125,000 SF in 1Q 2025.

    BUSTED

    Are people still fleeing? The current metro area population of San Francisco in 2026 is 3,386,000, a 0.68% increase from 2025. The metro area population of San Francisco in 2025 was 3,363,000, a 0.6% increase from 2024. The metro area population of San Francisco in 2024 was 3,343,000, a 0.45% increase from 2023. The metro area population of San Francisco in 2023 was 3,328,000, a 0.3% increase from 2022.

    BUSTED

    Why does he not second-source, why does he not check his facts. Trends are trends; they change.

    Reply
    • Hammon

      Dunger all of your claims about lack of law enforcement is the fault of your commiecrat party. You people are so pathetic that you’re afraid of offending people by locking them up. Busted!!!! You dumb ass.

      Reply
      • frank danger

        Ham On Dung: Prove it or STFU.

        What claims of lack of law enforcement are you taking about?

        Afraid of locking them up? Really, you accusing me of that? What an asinine thought.

        Reply
    • Larry Horist

      Frank Danger… You are the personification of the adage that “figures do not lie, but liars figure.” You are actually very good at digging out selective information that builds a biased argument, but overlooks the big picture and other facts. Virtually everything you wrote is refutable, but I have no intention of wasting my time on your agonizingly long specious rants. I said what I had to say. You said what you had to say. Rather then the endless and fruitless bickering you crave, I am very comfortable with letting the readers decide.

      Reply
      • Frank danger

        Then why even waste your time and ours?

        Frankly, your bottom line is equivalent to most of your posts where you do attempt to respond, refute, but mostly rehash the same old trash.

        Good to be comfortable though.

        Reply
  2. boone1

    frank danger your a communist moron so it’s you that should STFU ASSHOLE.

    Reply
  3. frank danger

    Boone1; no. If one spews it, one should be able to prove it. I don’t know how you see communist in my opinions, but if you think I’m a moron, an asshole, OK. Tis your right. You might want to learn how to spell better when you throw the M-word though. I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t know a communist if you met one. Besides, many of your Felon King’s most admired leaders are communists. And now he wants to bring American-style Democracy to Muslims, his bestest business partners. Or is it stop the nukes? Or open the Strait he let be blocked. Or end terrorism by proxy. Changes his mind more than a senior picking her dress for the prom.

    Love it when the Boone’s of the world have to get personal because talking issues intelligently is a bridge too far for their limits. Good when a man recognizes his limitations. Long word, you can look it up.

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Mr Horist: except for the truth, there was nothing to win..... I showed the numbers, I provided the source, I…