Select Page

Beleaguered by Bad News, the Madman of Moscow Doubles Down

Beleaguered by Bad News, the Madman of Moscow Doubles Down

One might expect Russian President Vladimir Putin to seek a face-saving exit from his disastrous invasion of Ukraine amid the relentless cascade of bad news battering his regime. Yet reports from the corridors of power in Moscow suggest the opposite. The so-called Madman of Moscow is digging in deeper, doubling down on a failing strategy that defies both military reality and basic self-preservation. If Putin sees his tenacity as leadership, he is certifiably insane.

Tyrants who build cults of personality around themselves eventually become prisoners of their own propaganda. Putin now embodies that cautionary message. Paralyzed by paranoia over assassination plots, he has transformed the Kremlin into a fortified bunker.

Security measures around the presidential compound have reached unprecedented levels. The man who once projected an image of public bare-chested horseback rides and appearances at every event no longer ventures out. He could not even muster enough courage for an appearance at Russia’s National Day celebrations — a telling absence that speaks volumes about his isolation and fear. This is not the behavior of a confident victor. It is the behavior of an animal cornered in its lair.

The litany of setbacks confronting Putin would test the resolve of any rational leader. Putin’s polling numbers have taken a noticeable dip as the public grows weary of endless sacrifice with diminishing returns. Battlefield casualties have reached staggering proportions, with estimates exceeding two million killed, wounded, and missing. The human losses have set a tragic record – surpassing the Battle of Stalingrad (St. Petersburg).

Ukraine’s forces continue to push Russian troops back in key sectors, inflicting losses that make every square kilometer of contested ground pyrrhic at best. Ukrainian drone strikes have penetrated deep into Russian territory, including audacious hits in and around Moscow itself. These are not mere pinpricks. They represent a sophisticated campaign that has targeted oil production facilities, refineries, and logistical hubs, disrupting fuel supplies and forcing emergency measures such as gasoline rationing and export bans. Long lines at Russian gas stations and warnings of rotting harvests from frustrated farmers paint a picture of an economy under siege.

The destruction of Russian tanks, aircraft, and other equipment proceeds at an alarming rate. High desertion rates have reached plague proportions – with Russian soldiers increasingly unwilling to serve as cannon fodder in a meat grinder of Putin’s making.

Even Putin’s supposed allies are proving unreliable. Belarus under Alexander Lukashenko has resisted full-throated entry into the conflict despite intense Kremlin pressure, preferring to preserve what remains of its fragile sovereignty rather than commit troops to certain slaughter.

Perhaps most telling is the waning support from China. Beijing, once viewed as an enthusiastic partner in challenging the West, has issued clear warnings to Putin against any nuclear escalation. The message is unmistakable: Do not even think about it. China’s leaders appear more interested in pragmatic calculation than in propping up a faltering Russian misadventure that risks broader instability.

One need not search far for additional indicators of decline. Russia’s territorial gains in 2026 have been minimal and costly, with net losses reported in some periods despite frantic offensives. The much-vaunted Russian military machine, once feared across Europe, now relies on outdated tactics, North Korean shells, and Iranian drones while burning through resources at unsustainable rates. Economic strain compounds the military woes, with fuel shortages, manpower deficits, and international isolation chipping away at the regime’s foundations.

A growing consensus, even among some cautious observers, holds that Russia is not winning this war and, more importantly, cannot win it under current conditions. Putin’s recalcitrance echoes the final desperate chapters of other authoritarian disasters. Like Adolf Hitler in his bunker, fixated on fantasies of victory while the Reich crumbled around him, the Russian president clings to dreams of a Soviet Union. His stubbornness may well lead not only to his political downfall but to something more personal and final. The generational damage to Mother Russia could prove incalculable — a hollowed-out military, a demoralized populace, and an economy scarred for decades.

To be clear, no one revels in the suffering of the Russian people, many of whom are as much the victims of Putin’s hubris as are the Ukrainians.

The West’s support for Ukraine, while imperfect and insufficient at times, has exposed the limits of Russian power. The free world must remain vigilant, providing Ukraine the tools necessary to defend itself while preparing for whatever irrational act a delusional leader might contemplate in paranoid desperation.

Putin’s behavior confirms what many have long suspected. He is a dangerous wounded Russian bear — a cornered tyrant with nuclear weapons at his disposal. It is a threat neither to be ignored nor surrendered to.

The irony is rich. Putin launched this invasion to restore Russian greatness, extends his empire and weaken the Western alliances. Instead, he has unified and expanded NATO, exposed his military’s weakness, and contracted Russia’s sphere of influence.

As the bad news continues to mount, one can only wonder how much longer the Madman of Moscow can sustain his grip on power. Mother Russia deserves better than this self-inflicted catastrophe. The world, meanwhile, watches and prepares for the reckoning – which seems increasingly inevitable

So, there ‘tis.

About The Author

Larry Horist

So, there ‘tis… The opinions, perspectives and analyses of businessman, conservative writer and political strategist Larry Horist. Larry has an extensive background in economics and public policy. For more than 40 years, he ran his own Chicago based consulting firm. His clients included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman. He has served as a consultant to the Nixon White House and travelled the country as a spokesman for President Reagan’s economic reforms. Larry professional emphasis has been on civil rights and education. He was consultant to both the Chicago and the Detroit boards of education, the Educational Choice Foundation, the Chicago Teachers Academy and the Chicago Academy for the Performing Arts. Larry has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress, and has lectured at colleges and universities, including Harvard, Northwestern and DePaul. He served as Executive Director of the City Club of Chicago, where he led a successful two-year campaign to save the historic Chicago Theatre from the wrecking ball. Larry has been a guest on hundreds of public affairs talk shows, and hosted his own program, “Chicago In Sight,” on WIND radio. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries have appeared on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He is praised by audiences for his style, substance and sense of humor. Larry retired from his consulting business to devote his time to writing. His books include a humorous look at collecting, “The Acrapulators’ Guide”, and a more serious history of the Democratic Party’s role in de facto institutional racism, “Who Put Blacks in That PLACE? -- The Long Sad History of the Democratic Party’s Oppression of Black Americans ... to This Day”. Larry currently lives in Boca Raton, Florida.

1 Comment

  1. frank danger

    Talk about a guy so obsessed with Trump he can’t even bring him up over Ukraine.

    What about the promised peace before 1/2025? Getting close to 2 years now.

    How about US funding? Seems to have stopped since 1/2025.

    What about those patriots soon to be manufactured in Ukraine, takes 12 to 18 months, when are they starting? Took Germany over three years. It would be faster for the US, Japan, and Germany, current licensees, to up production and send to Ukraine; hell we are upping production anyway for Iran given our stock is 50% depleted.

    Trump at NATO said Putin ready to make a deal, what’s up with that?

    Congress authorized $195 billion for Ukraine before Trump, $79 billion not dispersed, what’s up with that?

    In June the House authorized over $9B for Ukraine, is that on hold by Trump too? NATO pledge $80B in the same period. Not one NATO dollar is provided by the USA. What’s up with that?

    Seems like we keep saying let’s make a deal and when they don’t, we stop funding Ukraine. Then we pull sanctions off Russian oil letting them make billions which we started when the Hormuz closed but were reinstated at the end of May. Now we offer Ukraine the ability to make missiles in a fucking war zone like we do for Japan and Germany: oh wait, no war zone there. My bad.

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *