Is the Trump personality trumping his issues?
Trump’s personal success in politics has been derived from two factors – the voters differentiating his policies from his personality and facing weak unpopular opponents in 2016 and 2024.
It is easy for voters to wince at the man’s pugnacious and inexplicably belligerent personality and vote on the issues. I know because I am one such voter. He was never my choice among the candidates in the GOP primary election. In 2016, I cast my vote for then-Senator Marco Rubio (yeah, Little Marco). In 2024, I cast my vote for former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley – even though the nomination was already in Trump’s hands by the time the Florida primary rolled around.
Trump came to the presidency to be a disruptor of the left-wing political and cultural establishment that has held sway over government for generations in Washington. Disruptors create chaos, but as a conservative, I saw that as “good chaos.”
I have often written of my distaste for Trump’s rather immature angry combative style. But, for all his shortcomings – and they are considerable – I could not support the Democrats radical left-wing platform. I believed in legal immigration and saw the Biden open borders policies as a national crisis. I believed that transgender men should not be playing in women’s sports. I embrace the pro-life position on abortion. I disagreed with Democrats leniency on criminals. I believe that the federal government has become too powerful and expensive – and that the deficits and National Debt were trending America to economic collapse. I liked Trumps peace initiatives – especially his Abraham Accords that significantly settled conflicts in the Middle East. I agreed with his attacks on Iran. And the list goes on.
I was not on board with everything Trump did. Readers know that I strongly oppose his pro-Putin peace plan in Ukraine. I do not see tariffs as a good thing – but can understand short terms tariffs to combat specific trade inequalities. His administration has proven to be no better in reducing the annual budget deficits or slowing down the accumulation of National Debt. That concerns me. But… I was getting at least 80 percent of my personal agenda with Trump and the GOP. Conversely, I was opposed to 90 percent of what Democrats have been offering.
For me, issues trump personality … for the most part. There comes a time, however, that personality impacts on issues. Trump has never been one to care about his own credibility or likeability. I wrote about that when he was in the first year of his first term.
I believe his personality is the reason the GOP did not fare well in 2018, 2020 and 2022 – and are about to take another drubbing in 2026. In many ways, those elections were – and will be – a referendum not on his policies, but his abrasive personality.
He is not a likeable guy from a public perspective. Even supporters conceded that. Although people say quite the opposite of the private Donald Trump – as did Bill Maher after dining with the President.
Having spent decades as a political consultant, I have concluded that “likeability” is underrated in politics. Yes, we do measure favorable ratings, and we do label some political figures as “charismatic” – but that is not pure likeability. That quality is so important to voters that one of the most successful presidential slogans was “I like Ike.” (For you folks born in the Twenty-First Century, it was a reference to President Dwight Eisenhower.) Other presidents scored high on likeability – Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. Yes, they both had their haters, but they were genuinely liked by most voters – even those on the other side of the political divide.
Unfortunately for Trump, his likeability is very low – arguably among the lowest in American history. Even avid MAGA supporters are privately chagrined and embarrassed by his nasty rhetoric and tone deaf comments – such as saying that soldiers who are captured are unpatriotic … calling a reporter stupid for asking about something he said the day before (which he claimed he never said but did.)
Perhaps his worst response was his reaction to the murder of actor/director Rob Reiner. He posted:
“A very sad thing happened last night in Hollywood. Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS. He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace!”
By way of disclaimer, I was not fan of Rob Reiner’s politics. In my opinion, he was not merely a progressive or left-winger but was an obsessed radical nutcase in the tradition of such other Hollywood personalities as Robert De Niro and Michael Moore. But Trump’s public response to a murder under the most heart wrenching of circumstances was more than inappropriate. It was heartless and vulgar. And to suggest that Reiner and his wife were murdered because of the truly extreme statements he made about Trump is outrageous.
As a result, Trump’s likeability index took another dive. Virtually all the pro-Trump media personalities – such as CNN’s Scott Jennings — found the Reiner comments inappropriate and indefensible.
In addition to likeability, Trump has been suffering setbacks on policy matters that were once his strong points – immigration, the economy and foreign affairs. The combination of pugnacious personality, likeability (lack or) and losing ground on core issues is undermining Trump’s power and influence. Like Biden before him, Trump is not getting a lot of invitations to campaign for GOP candidates down the ballot – including a number of senators and house members.
Trump’s personality has not only reduced his effectiveness, but it has also been undermining the all-important issues. For many voters, personality is now trumping the issues. Since he will not be running for office in the future, he is personally beyond the reach of the voters except through the multitude of candidates in his party — the folks who will be on the ballot.
I have often lamented the fact that Trump could have been one of the nation’s greater presidents. He will still have a substantial legacy, but it is more convoluted than it needed to be. In many ways, Trump has been his own worst enemy – and that is the part hard to fathom. Trump reminds me of something President Nixon said after being forced to resign. “They stabbed us in the back, but we gave them the knife.” Too often Trump provides the ammunition that is used against him.
“Lame duck” is generally an appellation we ascribe to a president in his last months in office after the election of a successor. For all practical purposes, if Democrats take the House — as I expect they will — Trump’s policy agenda will be ground to a halt by gridlock – and even more so, if Democrats take the Senate. Trump could have the longest lame duck presidency in history.
Trump’s greatest problem is not the issues. It is personality. And it is crushing his credibility and likeability — two traits that are essential to political success.
Political fortunes can change like the weather, so one cannot rule out a comeback. He has personally shown remarkable resilience. But at this moment he needs to pullout of a political dive – a turnaround that has not even commenced yet.
Has Trump lost his mojo? We will know in the course of the next 11 months.
So, there ‘tis.

Joelarry Giberhoirson: And you thought I changed names a lot….. Are you becoming fake with Joe or is fake-Joe trying to become a real person? Or are the two of you, really one, ewe.
David Remnick of The New Yorker’s latest piece says it best in his opening: “Have you ever in your life encountered a character as wretched as Donald Trump? For many people, this was a question asked and definitively answered twenty years ago, when Trump was still a real-estate vulgarian shilling his brand on Howard Stern’s radio show and agreeing with the host’s assessment that his daughter Ivanka was “a piece of ass” and describing how he could “get away with” going backstage at the Miss Universe pageant to see the contestants naked.”
Guess you know when and where I am coming from. We here in NJ have early history with the man and the wake of destruction that follows as he promises the world and delivers little except unto himself. Remnick’s story goes downhill from there as should your feelings about his personality, politics, policies, programs, you get the drill.
I spell my name: Danger. And today, I am frank.
One answer to the New Yorkers question is “yes, I have encountered a character as wretched as Donald Trump” is Frank Danger! Almost one and the same with the same outlooks!
PB, prove it. Beyond some words, where have you seen “wretched.”
You can’t. Just all hat, all bull.
Just to remind you that you claim: ” I have encountered a character as wretched as Donald Trump” is Frank Danger! Almost one and same with same outlooks.”
That’s just fucking delusional. I may dislike Trump, for cause. After all he is a felon, 60 times over, a sex abuser, a digital rapist, a defamer of women, and a liar who said his daughter is a hot piece of ass. All proven, mostly adjudicated in court.
What’s in your wallet, dipstick, moths?
PB: I apologize for calling names; I usually only do so in retort, and for public folks. And you did not start it in your comments. I am sorry I called you a name in my reply. My bad, sorry again.
Dunger when Trump gets exonerated from the false charges, will you apologize to him? You really should. He showed you all what we think of him and the lawfare bullshit. But you’re an idiot but you need not apologize for that. It’s in your DNA. Danger??? What’s dangerous about you? Dunger is better for a nickname
Hamondung: thanks for the advice. I will give it the respect deserved. I think we knew what you thought of him. And when you pay to exonerate him, I will respect and honor the rule of law. And you should treat him as a felon 60 times over, sex abuser, digital rapist, who defames women. Do you?
You ask a lot for a man who gives precious little.
And for nicknames, you will be Squibodian Tiffwa; because you are.
Dunger should we believe that you were a peeping tom in your teen years? No no
Emildungfuckface: bwhaaaaat would ever make u say that stupidity. What the fuck does that have to do with Trump personality or The New Yorkers David Remnick commentary? Are you still binge drinking? Have you stopped beating the wife and finished you conversion therapy?
When you can’t debate on the facts, attack the man.
Free the Epstein files. You’ll see the peeping Bill’s, Don’s, and more.
Free the Smith deposition, you’ll see the peeping top secrets Tom.
Calm down Dunger. Nobody cares what you might have done. Just a question. But you do seem to be a very unstable person. You can’t even imagine that Trump was wrongly accused. But you assholes can’t win on the issues. One more question. In high school did you ever cop a feel on a teacher? Not saying you did. Just asking. Nothing will ever show Trump did anything wrong in the Epstein files. Do you not think that it would have been brought out if it was?
Emiledung: Perhaps you need to walk emile in the other man’s shoes, Emiliedung.
I don’t know you from Adam; you have yet to have anything interesting to say to me.
What is your profit from doing what you do?
Are you learning something?
Are you teaching something?
Are you attempting to shame, scare, or demean an anonymous poster you don’t like, or his ideas?
Are you trying to scare me away, make me stop —– what would that do, make PBP better by shielding from me?
What are you so frightened off that you have to lash out emotionally like this?
Or do you feel it’s your duty to do duty in a dutiful way?
It’s seems all pretty lame and useless, not an interesting fact or idea as you go two for two, thinking you are going toe for toe, when, in reality, you are just going for the gutter.
Hey, here’s a hand, step up on the curb with me.
Great not talking, discussing, or doing anything of meaning, good job.
Dunger I’m glad to know you survived the night and have joined us this morning. I hope you and your family have a wonderful Christmas. But remember the truth reason for the season. Jesus Christ lord.