Select Page

Is the left’s “suicidal empathy” destroying America?

Is the left’s “suicidal empathy” destroying America?

In his latest book, Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind, Dr. Gad Saad, the evolutionary psychologist and scholar affiliated with the University of Mississippi, may have identified the precise malady afflicting the American left. It may explain the underlying cause of progressive policies that seem antithetical to traditional values and common sense.

Saad, who launched the book at Ole Miss to wide acclaim, pulls no punches. As he has stated in television interviews and public appearances, “We care more about the rights of the felon than we care about the victims.” He further explains that empathy is great but “when it goes hyperactive, it becomes fatal.” Saad calls this phenomenon “suicidal empathy”, and he is correct. It is empathy gone amok. It is the orgiastic misfiring of one of our most noble virtues, and it is destroying the fabric of the nation.

Suicidal empathy is not ordinary compassion. It is not racism, xenophobia or any of the other isms. It is the pathological prioritization of empathy over reason, self-preservation, and the common good. It elevates victimhood to virtue and treats punishment as cruel. It conditions people to display empathy for those who harm society while ignoring the victims of that harm. Saad argues that this misdirected altruism leads societies to implement policies that endanger their own survival and security. The left has turned empathy into a political weapon, and the results are plain to see.

This suicidal empathy is inseparable from left-wing virtue signaling. The modern progressives – radical types — do not merely feel sorry for the downtrodden. They must broadcast that sorrow loudly and publicly to prove moral superiority. Virtue signaling demands that one side with the illegal immigrant, or the rioter or the common criminal, no matter the cost to law-abiding citizens. To question such policies is to be labeled heartless. Thus, empathy becomes performative rather than practical. It is not about helping people rise above their circumstances. It is about feeling good about oneself while society crumbles.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the left’s excessive tolerance of crime and antisocial behavior, especially when minorities are involved. Suicidal empathy dictates that criminals must be understood rather than punished. Bail reform, reduced sentences, and defunded police flow directly from this mindset.

The great irony is that suicidal empathy is mutually destructive to all demographic groups – including those to which the empathy is extended. No group suffers more from leniency and lack of enforcement of minority crime than the innocent members of the minority communities themselves. Rioters, looters and the drug cartellians are most active in the minority communities.

The left wrings its hands over “over-incarceration” while violent crime is iconic in America’s cities across the nation. Saad’s insight explains why repeat offenders are released back onto the streets only to victimize again. The focus is not on protecting the innocent but on avoiding any appearance of unfairness toward the perpetrator. We saw and example of that when the judge apologized to the would be presidential assassin Cole Allen for the conditions of his imprisonment. Or when a Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan aided and abetted the attempted effort by a person in her court avoid the execution of an ICE warrant.

When the perpetrator belongs to a favored minority group, the empathy meter goes into overdrive. Facts about crime statistics – or previous criminal record — become irrelevant. The race card is played where none exists, and society pays the price in blood and treasure.

The same suicidal empathy fuels the crisis of illegal immigration. The left cannot bring itself to secure the border because that would require turning away people it has decided to view as victims. Never mind that uncontrolled entry strains public resources, depresses wages for American workers, and allows criminals and terrorists to slip through. Empathy for the migrant overrides empathy for the American citizen whose community is transformed without consent. Yet the left persists, driven by the need to signal compassion while the nation’s sovereignty erodes. There is no better example of suicidal empathy that the creations of sanctuary venues designed solely to put people beyond the reach of the law.

Excess welfare programs follow the same pattern. Suicidal empathy insists that government must provide endless support without demanding personal responsibility or accountability. The result is generational dependency, broken families, and communities trapped in cycles of poverty – and massive fraud.

The left refuses to acknowledge that such policies often harm the very people they claim to help. Instead, any criticism is dismissed as racism or lack of compassion. Playing the race card becomes the default response to any debate about fiscal sanity or cultural norms.

One can view suicidal empathy as a variation of Stockholm Syndrome on a societal scale. Just as hostages begin to sympathize with their captors, large segments of the left have come to empathize with those who do the people and the nation harm. They identify more with the transgressor than with the law-abiding majority. This is not rational policymaking. It is emotional self-flagellation dressed up as moral progress.

Suicidal empathy acts as a virus that infects the DNA of the left. It spreads through academia, media, and politics, replicating itself in every institution it touches. It weakens the immune system of the culture until the host can no longer defend itself. Crime rises. Borders dissolve. Welfare rolls expand. Racial grievance replaces individual merit. All the while, the left pats itself on the back for its kindness even as the country suffers.

Dr. Saad has done the nation a service by naming and defining this affliction so clearly. If America is to survive, it must reject this self-destructive impulse. It must reclaim the balance between compassion and common sense. Without that correction, the left’s suicidal empathy will continue its deadly work until there is nothing left to save.

So, there ‘tis.

About The Author

Larry Horist

So, there ‘tis… The opinions, perspectives and analyses of businessman, conservative writer and political strategist Larry Horist. Larry has an extensive background in economics and public policy. For more than 40 years, he ran his own Chicago based consulting firm. His clients included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman. He has served as a consultant to the Nixon White House and travelled the country as a spokesman for President Reagan’s economic reforms. Larry professional emphasis has been on civil rights and education. He was consultant to both the Chicago and the Detroit boards of education, the Educational Choice Foundation, the Chicago Teachers Academy and the Chicago Academy for the Performing Arts. Larry has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress, and has lectured at colleges and universities, including Harvard, Northwestern and DePaul. He served as Executive Director of the City Club of Chicago, where he led a successful two-year campaign to save the historic Chicago Theatre from the wrecking ball. Larry has been a guest on hundreds of public affairs talk shows, and hosted his own program, “Chicago In Sight,” on WIND radio. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries have appeared on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He is praised by audiences for his style, substance and sense of humor. Larry retired from his consulting business to devote his time to writing. His books include a humorous look at collecting, “The Acrapulators’ Guide”, and a more serious history of the Democratic Party’s role in de facto institutional racism, “Who Put Blacks in That PLACE? -- The Long Sad History of the Democratic Party’s Oppression of Black Americans ... to This Day”. Larry currently lives in Boca Raton, Florida.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Three college degrees? At least? Couldn’t get it right the first time? Couldn’t get a real engineering degree? Or exaggeration…