China Tells the U.S. to ‘Stop Toppling’ Venezuela’s Government

China has openly demanded that the United States release Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife after the dramatic U.S. strikes on Caracas and other regions, followed by the capture and removal of Venezuela’s leader. Beijing has accused Washington of violating international law and trying to overthrow a sovereign government, while also signaling that it is watching developments in Latin America very closely.

China has issued multiple strongly worded statements since the U.S. operation. Beijing said it is “deeply shocked” and expressed “grave concern” after U.S. forces seized Maduro and his wife and flew them out of the country. The Chinese Foreign Ministry called the move a “clear violation of international law, basic norms in international relations, and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.”

Chinese officials demanded that Washington guarantee the safety of Maduro and his wife and “release them at once.” China further urged the U.S. to “stop toppling the government of Venezuela” and said that any resolution should come through “dialogue and negotiation,” not through military force.

China also accused Washington of “hegemonic acts” and a “blatant use of force.” One of Beijing’s earlier statements said China “strongly condemns the United States’ brazen use of force against a sovereign state and its actions directed at its president,” stressing that the United States must respect international law and the United Nations charter.

China has deep political and economic ties to Venezuela and to Latin America more broadly. Analysts note that China is Venezuela’s largest buyer of oil, although Venezuela only makes up about 4 to 5 percent of China’s total oil imports. Still, energy is only part of the picture. China has significant trade and investment interests across Latin America and views the region as a key part of its Global South strategy.

Andy Mok of the Center for China and Globalisation said that China had already been closely watching Venezuela, adding that a Chinese delegation had even met Venezuelan officials shortly before the U.S. operation. He said the way Washington carried out the mission may signal a long-term U.S. strategy in the region, which Beijing is carefully evaluating.

Mok also warned that if the United States revives a Monroe Doctrine style policy asserting dominance in the Western Hemisphere, tensions between China and the United States could grow because Latin America is becoming strategically important to China.

Will China Do More Than Protest?

Despite the strong language, most experts believe China will stop short of any military confrontation. Shaun Rein, a China-based analyst, said Beijing is “deeply alarmed” but limited in real options. He noted that China has almost no history of taking military action far from home and has only two overseas bases compared to what he described as roughly 800 American bases worldwide.

According to Rein, China is likely to continue issuing condemnations and work with sympathetic countries to criticize the U.S. action, but it is unlikely to respond with force or even major economic retaliation. He described China as historically not “warlike” and suggested Beijing will likely rely on diplomacy rather than confrontation.

Reactions around the world to the U.S. strike and Maduro’s capture have been sharply divided. Some left-leaning governments in Latin America condemned the intervention, while a number of right-leaning governments supported it. North Korea denounced the United States, calling the action “the most serious form of encroachment of sovereignty” and describing the U.S. as “rogue and brutal.” South Korea urged calm and called for dialogue and respect for the will of the Venezuelan people. Australia backed a peaceful democratic transition but also emphasized respect for international law.

China’s reaction fits into this wider debate. Many see Beijing as defending sovereignty and international law, while others say China is mainly protecting its economic and political stake in Venezuela and Latin America.

China’s repeated demand that the United States “stop subverting the Venezuelan regime” shows how seriously Beijing takes this crisis. For China, this is about far more than one leader. It is about whether powerful nations can remove governments by force, and about safeguarding its own influence in a region that is becoming increasingly important to its global strategy.

For now, China appears committed to diplomatic pressure, intense criticism, and close monitoring of events. Whether that will be enough, and how the United States will respond to Beijing’s warnings, will shape not only Venezuela’s future but also the broader relationship between the world’s two largest powers.