Select Page

It is a FACT.  The left is responsible for most political violence … period

It is a FACT.  The left is responsible for most political violence … period

(This is a very long commentary, but this issue cannot be covered in a headline and a few short words. That is because my explanation runs contrary to the widely held misconceptions and false narratives that most political violence comes from the right.  I beg to differ.)

I have written in the past about the radical left being responsible for most of the political violence throughout American history.  I wrote that based on experience and knowledge of history—the facts.

Of course, those on the left say otherwise.  MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough recently declared that “every study shows that most political violence comes from the right.”  As untrue as it is, that has been the left’s political mantra in recent years – regurgitated without investigation by the crony news media.  It is just another false narrative of the kind Democrats engage in as a matter of strategy.  (Remember the false Russian collusion narrative?  The false Hunter Biden laptop narrative?  The fascist dictator narrative?)    

To prove his point, Scarborough offered up a cherry-picked list of half dozen recent incidents of political violence – leaning heavily on right-wing violence.  It was a pathetic anecdotal list proving nothing.  And he is not alone in spreading such misleading disinformation.

Recently, CNN’s Michael Smerconish – who I greatly admire — supported the pox on both houses approach with his own short list of left and right-wing violence – six on each side.   That is about as informative of only counting murders that happen on Mondays. 

There is a much bigger picture, and it does settle the question of which side of the philosophical or partisan divide is responsible for the most violence — and it is not even close.  It is the big picture that the left refuses to see – or at least allow us to see.

We have to understand that the debate on political violence is skewed by the fact that the left simply does not include every instance of political violence in the count.  In fact, they simply ignore the vast majority of political violence.  And unfortunately, even the more objective, albeit gullible, observers accept those gross omissions. 

Political violence is not new to the American landscape. There have been so many acts of political violence in American history that there is not enough space to list them in this commentary.

The most significant omission from the list of political violent events are all those riots attributed to racial issues or simply described as civil.   In fact, virtually every race riot in my lifetime (think the last days of President Roosevelt) rises from the political left.   Those folks looting, burning, destroying, vandalizing, injuring and even killing – and those who aided and abetted them — were not the local conservative Republican folks.  And to suggest that those thousands of violent riots are not political in nature is to deny the existence of the sun.

From labor riots in the early 20th century to the unrest following the death of George Floyd, the United States has endured waves of destruction tied to ideological fervor. While both the left and right have committed acts of violence, the full historical and contemporary record shows that the preponderance of political violence has come from the left by far—a fact often downplayed or reframed by Democrats, the news media and academic institutions that lean left themselves.

The History of Political Violence in America

For the purposes of this commentary, we are focusing on a partial but representative list of major political violence since 1960.  It is by far not a complete list.  It does not cover the innumerable individual and unreported acts of low-level political violence– such as political headquarters vandalism or non-deadly assaults on local political figures.  Also, many of the individual listings I provide below cover simultaneous riots in scores or even hundreds of cities.

It is also noteworthy that most of the right-wing political violence is committed by nutcase lone wolfs. Whereas left-wing violence tends to involve organizations and massive numbers of participants.  Left-wing violence tends to be large scale — takin more lives, causing more injuries, destroying and damaged more property, and costing far more taxpayer and private money.

Here is a list of many of the major acts of political violence in the past 65 years.  It clearly shows the propensity of left-wing issues and players to motivate violence.

The List

Here is a list of many of the notable acts of political violence since 1960 -noting which side of the philosophic divide. It is not a complete list but is representative. 

EventYearLocationAffiliation / CauseType of Violence
Assassination of JFK1963Dallas, TXLeft / Marxist pro-CubaPresidential assassination
Assassination of RFK1968Los Angeles, CALeft / Anti-Israel PalestinianPolitical assassination
Stonewall Inn Riots1969New York, NYLeft/LGBTQ uprisingRiots against police raid
Sterling Hall Bombing1970Madison, WILeft / Anti-Vietnam WarCar bombing, 1 death, $2M damage
Greenwich Village Townhouse Explosion1970New York, NYLeft / Weather UndergroundPremature bomb blast, 3 deaths
Kent State Shooting Protests1970Kent, OHLeft / Anti-war rioting4 students killed
Capitol Bombing by Weather Underground1971Washington, D.C.Left / Anti-Vietnam WarDynamite explosion
Attempted Assassination of Gov. Wallace1972Laurel, MDLeft / Initially planned to kill NixonWallace paralyzed
Attempted Assassination of Gerald Ford #11975Sacramento, CALeft / Environmental extremism Gun jammed
Attempted Assassination of Gerald Ford #21975San Francisco, CALeft / Radical activismFired at Ford, narrowly missed
White Night Riots1979San Francisco, CALeft / LGBTQ outrageRiots after Dan White verdict
Miami Liberty City Riots1980Miami, FLLeft / Police acquittal18 deaths, 300 injuries
Attempted Assassination of Ronald Reagan1981Washington, D.C.Non-political / Obsession with Jody FosterReagan wounded, 3 others shot
Unabomber Attacks1978–1995NationwideLeft / Climate and technology issuesMail bombings, 3 killed, 23 injured
Rodney King Riots1992Los Angeles, CALeft / Police brutality59 deaths, 2,300 injuries
Oklahoma City Bombing1995Oklahoma City, OKRight / Anti-governmentFederal building bombing, 168 deaths
Cincinnati Riots2001Cincinnati, OHLeft / Police shootingLooting, arson, 70 injuries
Wrigleyville Fake Bomber2010Chicago, ILUndetermined / General grievancesPlanted fake bomb to incite chaos
Gabby Giffords Shooting2011Tucson, AZNonpolitical / Personal hatred possible job related6 killed, 13 injured
Occupy Wall Street2011NYC & 100+ citiesLeft / Anti-capitalismEncampments, clashes, arrests
Occupy Portland2011Portland, ORLeft / Anti-capitalismFires and vandalism
Ferguson Riots2014Ferguson, MOLeft / Police shootingArson, looting, clashes
NYPD Officers Ramos & Liu Assassinated2014Brooklyn, NYLeft / Anti-police revengeDouble homicide
Baltimore Riots2015Baltimore, MD and other citiesLeft / Freddie Gray deathArson, looting, National Guard
Mother Emanuel Church Shooting2015Charleston, SCRight / White supremacistMass shooting, 9 deaths
Charlottesville Riot & Car Attack2017Charlottesville, VALeft-wing rioting / Right-wing killerNeo-Nazi ramming attack, 1 death
Steve Scalise Shooting2017Alexandria, VALeft / Bernie Sanders supporterAttempted mass murder
Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting2018Pittsburgh, PARight / Antisemitic hate crimeMass shooting, 11 deaths
MAGA Bomber (Cesar Sayoc)2018NationwideRight / Pro-Trump extremismMailed 16 bombs to Democrats
George Floyd Riots202040+ citiesLeft / Police brutality$2B+ damage, dozens of deaths
Attempted Kidnapping of Gov. Whitmer2020MichiganRight / Anti-lockdown militiaFoiled plot, convictions
Capitol Riot2021Washington, D.C.Right / Stop certificationBreach of Capitol, 1 death
Buffalo Grocery Store Shooting2022Buffalo, NYRight / White supremacistRacially motivated mass shooting, 10 deaths
Attempted Assassination of Justice Kavanaugh2022MarylandLeft / Abortion rulingArmed suspect arrested
Knife Attack on Rep. Lee Zeldin2022Perinton, NYLeft / GOP hatredAttempted stabbing on stage
Paul Pelosi Hammer Attack2022San Francisco, CARight / Anti-Democrat conspiracyHome invasion, skull fracture
Trump Assassination Attempt #12024Butler, PALeft/ Viewed Trump as fascist. Grazed ear, 1 death
Trump Assassination Attempt #22024West Palm Beach, FLLeft / Feared Trump as fascistFoiled by Secret Service
Murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO2024New York, NYLeft / Anti-corporate terrorismTargeted shooting, terrorism charges
Assassination of Rep. Melissa Hortman and shooting others2025Brooklyn Park, MNRight / Anti-Democrat hit listGun attacks on state legislators
Arson of Gov. Josh Shapiro’s Residence2025Harrisburg, PALeft / Anti-Israel over warStarted fires in residence/ attempted murder
Anti-Israel Campus Riots2025Columbia, NYU, Harvard, othersLeft / Pro-Palestinian activismBuilding occupations, vandalism and attacks on Jewish students.
ICE Facility Attacks2025Portland, TX, othersLeft / Anti-ICE protestsArson, shootings, assaults
Tesla Vandalism & Arson2025NationwideLeft / Anti-Musk and DOGE.Showrooms and vehicles burned.  Privately owned cars damaged.
Assassination of Charlie Kirk2025Orem, UTLeft / Anti-conservativeSniper shot, 1 death

(Even as I am writing this, there have been two more news reports of violent attacks on ICE agents.  And a group protesting Jimmy Kimmel’s indefinite leave of absence got into a tussle with police.  This left-wing violence seems to be occurring on a daily basis.  Out of fairness, I looked for right-wing violence, None were reported anywhere.)

Comparative Reactions

One of the notable distinctions between the left and the right is how they react when displeased by political policies and events.  The left takes to the streets en masse.  Even so-called peaceful demonstrations too often break the law by blocking streets or access to businesses. They attack police officers with rocks, cans, and even urine.  All illegal and not protected by the Constitution.  And largely ignored – or excused – by leaders on the left.

To understand the difference, one only needs to look at the activities of Antifa and Black Lives Matter – which openly call for and engage in violence.  Compare that to the Tea Party movement in which the right to protest was exercised without violence, damage or arrests.

When George Floyd was murdered by police, the left erupted in acts of major – even deadly –violence across the nation. When Charlie Kirk was assassinated, there was an outburst of peaceful prayer vigils across the country – and around the world.  Ironically, those were violently attacked by left-wingers.

Those on the left talk a lot about right-wing violence and terrorism – and even predict it.  You may recall how the left predicted an outbreak of violence on the first anniversary of the January 6 Capitol Hill riot.  (Pelosi ordered fencing to be erected and called in the National Guard for security.  All for those 200 peaceful protesters who showed up to hear speeches.)  Or how right-wing terrorists would bring havoc to cities across America.  Or how right-wingers would attack the polling places on election day 2024. (In Arizona, the Chicken Littles even put up barriers and in one case positioned snipers on the roof.)   None of that happened.

In the aftermath of the Kirk murder, thousands of hateful left-wingers organically rose to destroy, burn or remove impromptu memorials – resulting in hundreds of arrests. It is the political DNA of the left to engage in street violence over every perceived grievance – weather organized or lone wolves.  In the past, I have labeled them the “perma-pissed”.  Their first impulse is to take to the streets – with some level of violence.

A Matter of Sanctioning

This knee-jerk response may be due to the fact that the left-wing establishment condones – and even supports political violence – both by lack of condemnation and in some cases outright encouragement. We see this in the left-wing Democrat mayors who order the police to stand down in the face of rioting or order the National Guard to stay away. We see it in the prosecutors who refuse to prosecute rioters.  In one of the most outrageous examples was Vice President Harris actually raised baoil money for rioters.  It is part of the left’s historic soft on criminals/hard on victims policies.

Summary

Political violence is corrosive to democracy, no matter who commits it. But ignoring or excusing violence from one side while dishonesty vilifying the other is intellectually dishonest and socially dangerous. The left must take ownership for its legacy of violence and take responsibility for the harm it has caused.

Until that happens – and apparently it will not happen soon — calls for unity and healing will ring hollow. Accountability must be universal, not selective. And the truth must be told—even when it’s inconvenient.

So, there ‘tis.

About The Author

Larry Horist

So, there ‘tis… The opinions, perspectives and analyses of businessman, conservative writer and political strategist Larry Horist. Larry has an extensive background in economics and public policy. For more than 40 years, he ran his own Chicago based consulting firm. His clients included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman. He has served as a consultant to the Nixon White House and travelled the country as a spokesman for President Reagan’s economic reforms. Larry professional emphasis has been on civil rights and education. He was consultant to both the Chicago and the Detroit boards of education, the Educational Choice Foundation, the Chicago Teachers Academy and the Chicago Academy for the Performing Arts. Larry has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress, and has lectured at colleges and universities, including Harvard, Northwestern and DePaul. He served as Executive Director of the City Club of Chicago, where he led a successful two-year campaign to save the historic Chicago Theatre from the wrecking ball. Larry has been a guest on hundreds of public affairs talk shows, and hosted his own program, “Chicago In Sight,” on WIND radio. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries have appeared on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He is praised by audiences for his style, substance and sense of humor. Larry retired from his consulting business to devote his time to writing. His books include a humorous look at collecting, “The Acrapulators’ Guide”, and a more serious history of the Democratic Party’s role in de facto institutional racism, “Who Put Blacks in That PLACE? -- The Long Sad History of the Democratic Party’s Oppression of Black Americans ... to This Day”. Larry currently lives in Boca Raton, Florida.

10 Comments

  1. Willie

    Lowlife scum who dare to call us fascist and try to bully us into walking their lines. Being influenced by the great speakers at the Charlie Kirk memorial, I say never back down. No matter what. Democrats are digging themselves a hole and are to stupid to realize it.

  2. Mike f

    Larry-Lots of incidents here, but you basically ignored all incidents of white on black violence, much of which happened in the 60’s and before, but a more recent incident would be the Dylan Roof church shooting. However, the big thing you ignored was the report that showed that far right attacks far outpaced those on the left, which was removed from the DOJ website by the current regime. So you could have saved yourself a lot of trouble (and been accurate for once) and just referenced that report that didn’t cherry-pick their data as you did. But that wouldn’t have stirred up your dozens of readers/supporters like you wanted would it? Just more bullshit from the ‘Oracle’ of Boca in the windbag post….

    • Carl

      Mike you’re lying. You’re getting as bad as Dunger

    • Larry Horist

      Mikef …You missed the point, The reports of right wing violence surpassing left wing violence are pollical narratives. Not accurate at all. That is why I did the research. The Dylan Roof case is in my compilation as a right wing incident. If you go back before the 1960, virtually all the racist incidents were the product of the Democrat Party’s control of the south an the major cities. Republicans were fighting against it.–from the abolitionist movement to the passage of the mid-century civil rights laws that had overwhelming GOP support. So what is your point?

      • Mike f

        My point Larry is that you ignored a government report (which the current regime has cleverly taken offline) which said exactly the opposite from what you state. You have cherry picked some incidents and jumped to the conclusion (surprise) that the left has been responsible for most violence. Then, in your response to me you blame the Democrats for the white on black violence, totally ignoring the fact that the democrats who committed this violence in the past were right wing (and now republicans!). Larry, you are an ignorant, divisive individual who writes trash for the windbag post and couldn’t be objective if your life depended on it…

      • Mary C

        EXCELLENT POINTS!

  3. frank danger

    I commend the author for taking on such a complex topic. Too bad discussion is muted around here by the screams of hate being flung across the aisles. The size and scope of political violence are huge, diverse, and difficult to understand. Our society is facing increased tensions, frustrations, divisions, and we are lashing out at each other more intensely every day. We need to come together to solve this. It’s a serious issue, calling for serious discussion by the adults in the room. Screaming at each other, pointing fingers, does not fix the problem. It’s time for serious people to come up with serious answers. Like mass murders, against the total number of Americans we off-by-gun each year, over 46,000 in 2023, the numbers for either mass murder or political violence are extremely low. The numbers of dead statistically do not make this a priority even. However, the effects on our national psyche are immense whether it’s our leaders are being mowed down or our kids are being senselessly gunned down. When you fear going to the mall, being in a crowd, or it’s too dangerous to run for office, speak out, even sing your song or tell a joke, that changes our society and culture by violence, not by a free choice.

    The author’s issue is that he just does not define or understand the problem. His lifetime of fighting his perceived enemy will not let him rise above the fog of his war against liberals. The problem is American violence, specifically political violence. The author believes, once again, in his familiar form, that liberals are the problem. Worse yet, he talks a lot about political violence, provides an admitted incomplete, partial, skewed, cherry-picked, spin database without actually defining what is his definition of political violence even is in his article or, more importantly, his database. That’s research 101.

    Sayin it’s just the Democrats fault will never fix the problem. If you exterminated what your side so eloquently calls “the vermin” magically, you would still have too much political violence. Both sides are using violence to solve problems too often. And not just political; almost any problem today is being solved by someone with a gun. Both sides. I can’t end conservative political violence and expect to get the job done either.

    That’s because the author has missed the real point: the problem is political violence or PV. Political parties are not the problem; individual people are the problem. And the problem comes from all walks of life for all sorts of reasons. Some political, some not so much, but resulting in PV anyways. Kirk’s guy may have done it from love, or what he thought was love. Others have been racial. Others looking for some notoriety. All sorts of motivations can result in PV. Most of us would say most of them are just plain crazy. Just focusing on Democrats misses the underlying motivations stemming from frustrations that drive the disenfranchised to destruction. Not to mention the enablers and cheerleaders. Groups and powerful people encouraging and enabling them often stand back just to enjoy the carnage. They are part of the problem. For both sides. Our foreign adversaries are chumming our waters too trying to stir us up and get us hating each other. They are part of the problem, for both sides. The internet exacerbates the problem, they are a huge part of the problem, for both sides, and inputs are global. Our own President, the most powerful man on the planet, blesses this by saying: “I disagree with Charley, I hate my opponents.” Well, what do you do with things you hate?

    Our President is currently sending Federal troops into Democratic cities to end crime. He picked cities with falling crime rates saying that the crime there is still too high even if lower than many areas under Republican control. Gee, isn’t PV similar to violent crime? Shouldn’t we pick parties with lower PV rates saying PV there is still too high? Why attack the preponderance of PV while we attack the lesser of priorities for crime?

    I contend we need to solve the problem for all Americans, not just one party, starting by defining what we are calling political violence. Otherwise, you just end up STILL with too much PV, now only coming from the right. That sounds like something that only a autocrat or dictator would find as a great manner to expedite his cause of one-party control. At least that’s what the last guy did to rid his country of his perceived vermin.

    Blaming Democrats alone is as stupid as blaming Republicans alone and does nothing to advance possible solution to the problem of political violence. It may rationalize a hater’s hate, but misses the point.

  4. frank danger

    I think this is a great article and that you are totally correct based on your facts and your unusual, if not unique, assessment of the situation.

    Shockingly, you say the radical left is responsible for most of the political violence throughout American history and you base that on experience and knowledge of history—what you call, the facts. Makes sense to me that you would and that it could.
    It’s a great chart. Did you do it or plagiarize someone else? Is there a source, sources, or is this data based on your experience and knowledge of history? Which you call facts. You say you tell the truth and the experts are lying. You say you tell the truth and the media is lying. Given your list, given their lists, where are the outages or differences.

    Some is in the definition of political violence which you do not provide. I find including foreign actors to prove Democrats bad a big ingenuous. I find counting violence against police raids, especially stealth raids, strange when you don’t count most instances of police brutality to citizens, usually of the brown or black persuasion. Sans a definition of political violence, and there are a few, just not sure what you are counting.

    I agree, you are right, the people inciting and doing political violence should take ownership and responsibility for their actions. The way the 1/6/2021 rioters and Republicans do not take ownership, did not take responsibility, but it really does not matter for conservatives because conservatives like to pardon all conservative protestors and conservative perpetrators of pollical violence from Federal crimes. If that does not call for unity and healing, nothing does. Hey, there were all right, all white, so yet another perk. Was not that pardon in itself an act of political violence? Considering that the pardoned have already been arrested for soliciting minors (two of these patriot Republicans arrested), killed for being armed and resisting police, battering their wives, plotting their revenge to murder the FBI guys who arrested them, home invasion, theft, murder by dui, and child pornography. Sure seems that they were released due to politics only to commit more violence. And you are right, if they don’t take responsibility, calls for unity and healing will ring hollow, so why bother? Unless accountability is universal, not selective, in your “accountability,,” progressives go to prison, conservatives get pardoned. Until the truth is told, we cannot move forward. Back it up, buttercup, because here’s the bitter truth: Our President is a convicted felon who sexually abuses women, cheats on his taxes, cheats on his own charity, cheats his university students, cheats on his wife, and cheats at business, and attempts to rig almost every election he was ever in. But wait, there’s more: he got her alone in the dressing room, slammed her against the wall, lifted her skirt, pulled down her panties and pantyhose, and shoved his fingers into her vagina. I say accountability starts where the buck stops.

    According to court records and from her book: Trump closed the door of the dressing room. Immediately, Trump lunged at Carroll, pushing her against the wall, bumping her head quite badly, and putting his mouth on her lips. Carroll shoved him back. Utterly shocked by unexpected attack, Carroll burst out in awkward laughter. She could hardly process the insanity of the situation. She also hoped, at least at first, that laughter would bruise his ego and cause him to retreat. But Trump did not stop. He seized both of her arms and pushed her up against the wall again, bumping her head a second time. While pinning Carroll against the wall with his shoulder, Trump jammed his hand under her coat dress and pulled down her tights. Trump opened his overcoat and unzipped his pants. Trump then pushed his fingers around Carroll’s genitals and forced his penis inside of her. Carroll resisted, struggling to break free. She tried to stomp his foot with her high heels. She tried to push him away with her one free hand (as she kept holding her purse with the other). Finally, she raised a knee up high enough to push him out and off her. Carroll ran out of the dressing room, out of Bergdorf’s, and on to Fifth Avenue. The whole attack lasted two to three minutes.

    “Accountability must be universal, not selective. And the truth must be told—even when it’s inconvenient.”

    • Seth

      And of course he did that shit in front of an audience. You can’t imagine that, in light of the Russia lies fell apart,Trump’s enemies could have falsely accused him. It’s interesting that the sexual assault allegations didn’t surface during his run against killery rotten Cunton. It’s scary how easily someone can be accused and prosecuted by liars. And just look at how the communist monkeys in New York changed laws into felony charges and prosecuted Trump for bullshit that had never been prosecuted before. But what happened? He’s still standing, asshole!!! And James Comey is going to jail. And that’s just the beginning. The left can’t kill us all.

      • frank danger

        Seth’s comments revolve around: “And of course he did that shit in front of an audience. You can’t imagine that, in light of the Russia lies fell apart, Trump’s enemies could have falsely accused him.” That’s a many splendored pieces of logic, not bad Seth, but I think I can see a few fallacies like: If you think only rapes with an audience can be charged, there will be few rapes in America. Or you do realize that in the Access Hollywood tape, Trump actually tells an audience this is what he does. In his own words. On tape. Actually, I think Trump is up to 28 accusers, many who tell a similar tale of the groper groping as groping seems to be his favorite sexual abuse. His own wife accused him and then withdrew the allegation and went shopping with a gold card (kidding). Many have entered the legal system, but only Carroll went the distance. There is even one 13-year old complainant from Trump’s time with his best friend Epstein. Attacking Trump In court is expensive, time consuming, and emotionally draining. He seems to enjoy the process, certainly drags it out. Even seasoned prosecutors think twice about taking a guy to court that will only be resolved after the prosecutor retires. If you’re looking to hang victory scalps off your belt, Trump is not your best choice. Your timing argument also falls short in that Trump sexual abuse allegations have been going on for decades. Here they are: * https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/13/list-of-donald-trump-sexual-misconduct-allegations* You will note many of these stem from before his Presidency. And it’s grown from 24 in this article to 28 victims today as more come forward. That’s a good audience, or a very busy boy.

        Two of “the audience” testified, under oath, with perjury attached against Trump. The jury determined, via the verdict, their stories were true. Or true enough for civil law. Trump did not sue them for perjury, defamation, just sat there and took it in front of an audience. Jessica Leeds testified that Trump groped her on an airplane in the late 1970s. Natasha Stoynoff, A journalist, testified that Trump forced her against a wall and kissed her while she was at his Mar-a-Lago resort for an interview in 2005. Further, Dr. Leslie Lebowitz, a clinical psychologist, testified she evaluated Carroll and found that she had been harmed by an assault. Trump did not sue for perjury or offer contesting expert witness testimony.

        I think if you read the court case, see what the jury heard, listen to the witnesses, that if you come away with the judge, jury, press, etc. all being rigged —— pretty much you do not believe in American justice having any validity.

        The Russia lies did not fall apart. Nor was Trump exonerated. Muller just could not find sufficient evidence to indict. From The Guardian: “Mr Mueller and his team concluded that they were unable to charge the president with a crime, but could not exonerate him either.” Mueller said there was much smoke, but with so many liars and the incarcerated knowing they would be pardoned, and they were, pretty hard to find the smoking gun. Not going to flip this gaggle of criminals. My take has always been: no Presidential candidate before Trump EVER met with the RUSSIANS. PERIOD. NEVER. Team Trump held what various sources contend are a multitude of meetings and contacts. The Senate subcommittee counted over 100 contacts, NYTimes said over 140. It was estimated that 25 people were aware of the Russian contacts and over 15 were known to have them. Heck, you’ve seen the major meetings attended by Russian spies and team Trump. We know Russia meddled in our election and we know Trump benefitted over Hillary for it. To imagine that Team Trump did not expect to benefit from these contacts is like saying you’re at a free all you can eat whorehouse and you suddenly announce you are on a fasting diet. Not bloody likely. But we couldn’t catch him, we did catch a lot of crime, Trump pardoned them all, and we move on, not forward, on.

        The left, or anyone, did not falsely accuse Trump of the sexual abuse and defamation of EJ Carrol. It was adjudicated in a court of law and Trump had little defense. The left did not falsely accuse Trump of Stormygate where the intent was to rig the 2016 election by squashing a whorey story. The left did not falsify Trump’s business record felonies; they were documented by Trumpco in his financial files. The left did not falsify Trump’s ripping off his University or his charity; the students and the financial ledgers did and Trump paid out. Your claim falls short if you read the court transcripts to hear what the judges and jurors heard in these cases. It’s convenient to scream “rigged,” but really —- how many cases in how many places and never once, does Trump come up aces. Unlike your musings garnered from the blogsphere, this stuff is on the record, subject to perjury, adjudicated in a court of law from a nation built on the rule of law. Man’s law. Our law.

        “It’s scary how easily someone can be accused and prosecuted by liars.” Are you talking about Comey now where you say: “And James Comey is going to jail. And that’s just the beginning.” Really? Have you seen the “Revenge and Retribution List?” We’ve all read Patel’s, but have you seen Trump’s? OK, I am sure Comey will be another story, but let’s get real. The only lawyer Trump could find was his personal insurance lawyer from Florida. WTF is an insurance lawyer and who has a personal one? But she is not a Federal Prosecutor, she has never been to federal court, and she’s going up against one of the best defense lawyers in America. She got the job because the previous guy got fired for saying about the case: “you have got to be fucking kidding.” There’s a litany of memos, some from her own office, saying this case is a loser. And the chief testimony against him has judges on the record siding with Comey and saying the damning testimony is questionable. On the record. In writing. Adjudicated. I think we are about to see an epic crash and burn with her taking a huge CLM (career limiting move) which she totally deserves. And her predecessor who ran from the case is a respected Republican of both the RINO and MAGA sets. How many other good, experienced lawyers passed on the case before she of little skills, less experience, said: “sure, I’ll giver er a whack.” Is she that desperate to take a case where she will be clearly swinging for the fences without a bat? For skills, she went to UofMiami, rated at the bottom of the first half of law schools. On her first federal outing, indicting a ham sandwich, she went for three charges and got two. No one helped, the other 300 lawyers ducked which is laudatory for her. Surprising even. And why did she not get the third bite at the ham sandwich? The third charge. Crook judge perhaps? Rigged game maybe? Or might be that she handed in the wrong paperwork for the third charge. Ooops. Her adversary is Patrick Fitzgerald, with degrees in economics and mathematics from Amherst College, Phi Beta Kappa, and a Harvard JD. Played rugby for both, boy knows who to beat the scrum, not just another elitist nerd. JD Vance organized flag football at Yale. Elitist scum some say. But I digress.

        Bottom line: Comey can’t wait to get to court and will probably go for an early dismissal, expedited trial date, or both. My bet is it will never reach the jury and somehow, which the magic marketing that our brand master general creates, that will be the Democrats fault. This scandal could move very fast. Makes for great TV!