Why Do Democrats and the Left-Wing Establishment Love Criminals So Much?
(Disclaimer: This is a long commentary, but even as such, it cannot cover the innumerable examples of the Democratic Party’s embrace of the criminal classes over law enforcement. We see new examples on a daily basis.)
In the landscape of American politics, a perplexing pattern emerges. Democrats and the radical left-wing establishment consistently prioritize the interests of criminals over those of law-abiding citizens. This affinity manifests in myriad forms, from historical apologias for urban riots to contemporary obstructions of federal law enforcement.
Officeholders, prosecutors, judges, and activists alike champion policies that shield offenders, demonize police, and erode the foundational principles of justice. Victims of crime—often hardworking families in vulnerable communities—find their pleas drowned out by rhetoric that reframes predation as protest and recidivism as redemption.
The left’s “soft on crime” history is long and deep. From excusing riots in the 1960s to sanitizing notorious figures like George Floyd and Kilmar Abrego Garcia in recent years and even decrying the “neutralization” of Venezuelan narco terrorists by the Trump administration, the left’s embrace of criminality reveals a profound betrayal of public safety. Whenever there is a conflict between crime and law enforcement, Democrat tend to side with the criminals.
This phenomenon is not mere oversight. It is systemic. Progressive leaders legislate leniency, obstruct prosecutions, and fund bail for arsonists while ordering police to stand down amid chaos. Sanctuary policies harbor violent undocumented immigrants, and judicial activism thwarts deportations. The result? A nation where crime surges unchecked, communities fracture, and trust in institutions evaporates. As of October 2025, with urban violence resurging and federal agencies like ICE under siege, the urgency to confront this reality intensifies.
A Long History of Excusing Crime
The left’s sympathy for criminals traces its roots to the turbulent 1960s, an era in which liberal intellectuals and reformers recast societal unrest as righteous rebellion. The Watts riots of 1965 in Los Angeles left 34 dead, over 1,000 injured, and property damage exceeding $40 million—yet progressive voices, including sociologists and civil rights advocates aligned with the Democratic Party, attributed the violence not to individual accountability but to entrenched poverty and racial injustice. Similar narratives dominated coverage of the 1967 Detroit riots, which claimed 43 lives and razed entire neighborhoods, and the 1968 Chicago disturbances following Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, where looting and arson were excused as cathartic responses to oppression.
(Let me make one thing very clear. I understand the societal undercurrents of segregation, racism, and oppression that can create the anger and frustrations that may lead to anti-social and criminal behavior. However, that cannot – and must not — be used to excuse specific individual criminal behavior as those on the left are want to do.)
While legitimate grievances – such as discrimination and oppression — need to be addressed, the left’s refusal to enforce the rule-of-law by condemning specific criminal acts has fostered a culture of rationalization. Reports from the Kerner Commission, influenced by liberal policymakers, emphasized “white racism” over personal responsibility, paving the way for policies that prioritized rehabilitation over retribution.
This groundwork endured through the 1970s and 1980s, as Democratic administrations in cities like New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Detroit expanded social programs that, in practice, served as de facto amnesties for offenders. By the 1990s, amid the crack epidemic, figures like then-Senator Joe Biden co-authored the 1994 Crime Bill, which included tough measures but also funded community-oriented policing that critics on the left later decried as overly punitive—revealing an internal tension that always tilted toward an unearned sense of clemency.
Fast-forward to the 21st century, and this legacy informs responses to events like the 2020 George Floyd unrest. Democrats framed widespread looting and burning as “mostly peaceful” expressions of anguish, echoing 1960s justifications. The pattern persists. In 2025, amid renewed anti-ICE demonstrations, progressive media outlets sanitize violence against federal agents as “resistance,” perpetuating a cycle where criminals evade consequences and society pays the price.
Refusal to Prosecute: The Revolving Door of Justice
At the heart of the left’s criminal affinity lies prosecutorial abdication. Progressive district attorneys, often bankrolled by philanthropists like George Soros, wield “prosecutorial discretion” as a weapon against enforcement. In cities under Democratic control, charges against rioters, looters, and assailants evaporate with alarming regularity. Consider Philadelphia’s Larry Krasner, who in 2021 dismissed cases from the 2020 riots, citing “trauma” among protesters. By 2025, his office had released over 70 percent of arrestees from anti-deportation clashes without indictment, emboldening further disorder.
This leniency extends to repeat offenders. Hardened criminals with rap sheets spanning decades—burglaries, assaults, drug trafficking—cycle through arrest and release like clockwork. In Chicago, under State’s Attorney Kim Foxx, a 2024 audit revealed that 85 percent of felony theft cases under $500 were dropped, funneling shoplifters back to streets already plagued by organized retail crime rings. Nationally, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers reports that progressive DAs dismiss 40 percent more cases than their predecessors, often invoking unspecific “equity” to spare minorities regardless of guilt.
Even violent felonies escape scrutiny. In 2025, Los Angeles DA George Gascón declined to pursue enhanced sentences for gang members involved in a mass shooting, arguing “restorative justice” over incarceration. Such decisions not only victimize the innocent anew but erode deterrence, as offenders perceive impunity. This prosecutorial timidity, rooted in a disdain for “mass incarceration,” transforms courthouses into turnstiles, where justice yields to ideology.
Legislating for the Benefit of Criminals
Democratic lawmakers have codified this softness through statutes that prioritize offenders’ comfort over victims’ security. California’s Proposition 47, enacted in 2014 with overwhelming Democratic support, reclassified thefts under $950 from felonies to misdemeanors—equivalent to a traffic violation. The result? A 2025 California Department of Justice report documented a 300 percent spike in organized retail theft, with smash-and-grab crews operating unchecked in San Francisco and Los Angeles. Perpetrators face no jail time. No restitution mandates. They simply abscond with impunity.
Cashless bail reforms amplify this folly. Championed by Democrats in New York and Illinois, these laws release suspects—often accused of assault, robbery, or worse—hours after booking, without a financial stake in appearing for trial. New York’s 2019 overhaul led to a 20 percent recidivism rate among released violent offenders within weeks, per a 2023 state analysis. In practice, it dismantles the bail system’s deterrent function, flooding streets with those least likely to comply.
Sanctuary city ordinances represent the nadir of such legislation. More than 1,000 jurisdictions, predominantly Democratic strongholds like Chicago, New York, San Francisco, Portland, and Denver, enact policies barring local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This defiance shields undocumented immigrants who commit heinous crimes. The 2015 murder of Kate Steinle in San Francisco exemplifies the peril: her killer, Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, a Mexican national deported five times, walked free under sanctuary edicts, only to fatally shoot her on a pier.
In 2025, the toll mounts. ICE’s Operation Community Shield apprehended 1,200 criminal aliens in sanctuary cities, including rapists and child predators, yet local officials issued non-compliance orders. Boston’s Democrat administration withheld data on 150 gang-affiliated arrests, citing “trust-building.” Oklahoma’s Operation Guardian nabbed 120 undocumented truckers with fraudulent licenses and violent histories, many shielded by sanctuaries. These laws compel local forces to ignore federal warrants, endangering all while Democrats decry ICE as “terrorizing communities.”
Elected Officials Obstructing Justice
Beyond legislation, Democratic elected officials actively sabotage enforcement. In September 2025, 13 New York officials—including Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and Comptroller Brad Lander—were detained at an anti-ICE rally outside 26 Federal Plaza, where they demanded entry to detention cells and blocked deportations. Williams proclaimed the action a “moral imperative,” prioritizing detainees’ interests over constitutional due process.
Progressive congresswomen like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar have amplified such theatrics. AOC’s 2020 appearance at a Texas facility protest, amid clashes injuring agents, saw her label the criminal assailants as “defenders of humanity.” Omar’s 2025 tweetstorm condemned ICE raids as “state violence,” urging followers to “resist by any means.”
Attacks on Law Enforcement: From Restraint to Assault
Democrats’ animus toward police crystallizes in directives to “stand down” in the face of mob violence. The 2020 riots—sparked by George Floyd’s death—saw Democratic mayors in Minneapolis, Seattle, Portland, and beyond withhold National Guard support. Portland’s Ted Wheeler rebuffed federal aid for weeks, as Antifa attempted to torch a federal courthouse and attack ICE agents. Seattle’s Jenny Durkan hailed the CHAZ/CHOP “autonomous zone” as a “summer of love,” despite five homicides within its lawless bounds.
In 2025, assaults on ICE intensify – often with the encouragement of Democrat officials. Agents endure daily barrages of bricks through windshields in Chicago, Molotov Cocktails in Los Angeles, gunfire threats in Phoenix. A July 4 attack on a Texas facility involved masked assailants firing fireworks as projectiles and deploying spotters—yielding 10 federal indictments for terrorism. Yet, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker vilifies federal agents as “bootjack” occupiers – comparing them to the Gestapo. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson described looters as “entrepreneurs starved of investment.” New York City mayoral candidate Zohan Mamdani said the solution to crime if “affordable housing”.
Local police fare no better. In June 2025, a leftist mob in Springfield, Illinois, torched a state trooper’s vehicle during an ICE escort, with bystanders chanting “pigs in a blanket.” Democratic leaders like Pritzker and Johnson fuel this through inflammatory rhetoric, framing law enforcement officers as oppressors while viewing rioters as the aggrieved. Progressive media complicity—labeling firebombed precincts “fiery but mostly peaceful”—exacerbates the peril, as assaults on federal personnel surged 25 percent this year.
Canonizing Criminals, Demonizing Law Enforcement
Nowhere is the left’s sanitization more evident than in elevating felons to martyrdom while vilifying guardians of order. George Floyd’s 2020 death, ruled a homicide by overdose and illegal choking, ignited global fury—but Democrats airbrushed his record — nine arrests for armed robbery, drug possession, and a 2007 home invasion in which he pressed a loaded pistol to a pregnant woman’s abdomen. Figures like then-Vice President Kamala Harris eulogized him as a “gentle giant,” murals proliferated, and curricula enshrined his “sacrifice.” This political hagiography ignored his crimes, fueled “defund the police” mania that slashed Minneapolis police budgets by $8 million – which correlated with a 2021 homicide spike.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia embodies the 2025 iteration. He was deported to El Salvador in April amid MS-13 ties, alleged human trafficking, and extortion. Democrats like Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen decried his removal as “vindictive cruelty” – describing Garcia as a hardworking family man. Despite indictments for gang violence from 2016-2025 and two protection orders requested by his wife, a delegation of Democrat legislators flew to El Salvador at taxpayer expense to “advocate for his rights.”
The Venezuelan narco terrorists struck down by Trump-ordered naval operations in 2025 draw parallel outrage. The administration’s Pacific strikes sank eight “go-fast” boats operated by Tren de Aragua, killing 14 cartel enforcers smuggling fentanyl precursors—linked to 50,000 U.S. overdoses annually. Democrats, including House Speaker Hakeem Jeffries, assailed the actions as “illegal saber-rattling” and “extrajudicial murder”. MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski referred to the drug-runners as “passengers” on those boats. California Governor Gavin Newsom echoed this, calling strikes “disproportionate aggression” while ignoring the boats’ role in poisoning American youth.
Such canonization—Floyd as icon, Garcia as hard working refugee, drjug-runners as casualties—contrasts with demonization of police. Post-Floyd, officers face reflexive guilt. In 2021. The Ma’Khia Bryant shooting in Columbus, Ohio, saw media and Democrats like Maxine Waters decry a “militaristic” response – ignoring that Bryant was wielding a knife in an attempt to stab a foster sister.
This “police as the enemy” has resulted in Democrats — such as Portland Mayor Wheeler, Illinois Governor Pritzker, California Governor Newsom, LA Mayor Bash and others –accusing police as being the provocateurs of violence.
Prosecutorial Abdication and Legal Loopholes
Progressive DAs exacerbate chaos through loopholes. San Francisco’s Chesa Boudin, son of Weather Underground radicals, declined to charge 60 percent of felony suspects in 2021, invoking “alternatives to incarceration”. Oregon’s Mike Schmidt mirrored this, dropping gun cases amid Portland’s 2025 record homicide rate.
Soros-backed reforms nationwide—$40 million invested—yielded similar results. Philadelphia’s Krasner released 100+ rioters; Los Angeles’ Gascón barred sentencing enhancements. Voters rebelled: 2024 ballot measures in Oregon and California overturned these with 62 percent approval, acknowledging urban crime’s 30 percent urban.
No-cash bail in New York released 90 percent of violent arrestees on pre-trial. A 2025 study linked it to 15 percent increase in re-offenses. These policies, sold as equity, shield predators at citizens’ expense.
Judicial Complicity: Courts as Criminal Shields
Judges, too, abet this agenda. Massachusetts’ Shelley M. Richmond Joseph shepherded a twice-deported Dominican drug dealer from ICE by falsifying records and cutting off cameras.
In 2025, Milwaukee’s Hannah Dugan faces charges for spiriting an undocumented child rapist via a courthouse backdoor, misleading agents on warrants. Her potential six-year sentence underscores activism’s cost, yet peers like New York’s Laura Taylor Swain have dismissed 200+ ICE cases on “jurisdictional” pretexts.
Denial of the Crime Crisis
Amid surging violence—Chicago’s 2025 carjackings up 40 percent, Los Angeles homicides at a decade’s peak—Democrats gaslight. Mayor Johnson styles looters as “traumatized youth,” Pritzker blames “federal provocation” for Broadview facility sieges by mobs — where fireworks were used as weapons against agents.
The left-wing Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) posted a tribute to Assata Shakur (born Joanne Chesimard) as a great civil rights leader. Shakur was a convicted murderer – having killed a New Jersey state trooper in cold blood in 1973. She escaped from prison and fled to Cuba, where she lived until her death in 2025. Chicago Mayor Johnson – a former official of the CTU – refused not only to condemn the action but also heaped his own praise on Shakur.
In September of 2025, Johnson proclaimed that, “jails and incarceration and law enforcement is a sickness.” Two months later, he underscored that sentiment when he said, “imprisoning violent criminals is racist, immoral, and unholy,
Baltimore’s Brandon Scott, Los Angeles’ Karen Bass, New York’s Eric Adams, and Oakland’s Sheng Thao parrot “crime is declining” narrative while scorning Trump’s ICE surges as “fearmongering.” This denial, rooted in “root causes” like racism, absolves criminals and indicts victims.
New York’s Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has also endorsed policies to curtail (defund?) policing in favor of intervention by therapists. He appointed Tamika Mallory to his transition team on public safety despite her record opposing police funding. “One day we can abolish police,” she said. Mallory was a onetime acolyte of the overtly antisemitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan
Taxpayer-Funded Criminal Comfort
The left’s largesse extends to subsidies. Sanctuary cities furnish undocumented felons with gratis housing, attorneys, and—erroneously—stimulus checks. A 2025 GAO audit revealed more than $2 billion in improper payouts. Trump’s SNAP exclusions for illegal aliens drew Democratic howls of “xenophobia”. New York allocated $10 million in 2025 for migrant “trauma centers” housing deportable gangbangers.
Summary
This chronicle exposes only a small fraction of the Democratic left-wing establishment’s support for criminals — from 1960s riot excuses to today’s defense of narco terrorists. By legislating impunity, obstructing justice, assaulting enforcers, and canonizing thugs like Floyd, Garcia, and Tren de Aragua operatives, they unravel the social contract. Victims languish forgotten. The republic teeters as lawlessness becomes institutionalized. Voters must reclaim justice, electing leaders who value order over optics, before anarchy consumes all. Restoration demands vigilance. Indifference invites ruin.
In so many ways … in so many regions … in so many cases … at so many levels … for so long a time … there is one common thread. The radical left-wing Democrat establishment – including its media allies — loves criminals and abhors strict law enforcement.
So, there ‘tis.
The criminals do their bidding when they are schooled by the democrats that the world owes them a living.
Willie, except Red states get more welfare benefits than blue states. They can’t even take care of all the kids their brood mares pop out.
From Brookings: “Data suggests that “red states” (typically Republican-leaning) often receive more in total federal welfare and safety net funds, especially when adjusting for cost of living, even though “blue states” might offer higher state-controlled benefits; red states tend to have higher reliance on federally directed aid like SNAP and TANF, with higher dependency overall. While blue states lead in state-run programs, red states consistently show higher federal dependency ratios, with more people receiving SNAP and other assistance, despite perceptions.” Milken Institute agrees.
I think we know who feels they are owed a living. That’s just deplorable.
And from Money Geek:
“Seven of the 10 states most dependent on the federal government were Republican-voting, with the average red state receiving $1.24 per dollar spent.
Thirty-one states sent more to the federal government than they received, slightly higher than the 29 states in 2022.
Of the states that sent more than they received, 48% were Democrat-voting, and 52% were Republican-voting.
New Mexico had the highest return on federal spending of any state ($3.42 per dollar spent), and Delaware had the lowest ($0.46 per dollar spent).”
You give less, take more, have less education, lower pay, but yet: we love ya man. Hang in there and keep blaming us for your success.
Dunger you’re a liar who spouts bullshit from communist fake news. And exactly what is a brood mare? A woman who bears children? I’m sorry your mother got drunk while the special Olympics was in town.
What fake news? What bullshit?
Keep attacking the man because that’s all you have on the issues and facts.
You can’t prove anything I said as wrong.
That’s incompetence topped by being ineffective. Not even adequate to the task. You got nothing except third grade bathroom humor lies about my dead Mom. Love to see you try that shit in person.
I spell my name frank. And I am danger to fools.
Horist seems losing his compassion in his zeal to beat the other side by denigrating them as he revamps his Nixonian era rants and screeds. That’s his right, but I fail to understand why he fails on the facts, and why he seems not to believe in second chances for liberals, but all sorts of chances for Trumpians. He wants to save the lives of druggies, could care less about drug mules, and condemns Floyd for past transgressions, no quarter or second chance offered.
He blames Democrats for coddling criminals while he votes for a felon. A felon whose top staff of his 2020 election went to jail, his top lawyer went to jail, his CFO went to jail, his best friend committed suicide in jail, and his side pardoned over 1,800 criminals, the largest number of freed crooks in Presidential history. A dozen are back in jail already, one for an assassination attempt on Jeffries, one for knifing a cop over a traffic ticket, with many more somewhere in the legal system process. He says he stands for our boys in blue as he freed those who injured over 140 boys in blue in support of his felon king.
Does that sound a tad hypocritical to you? Tis true though.
His depiction of George Floyd is cruel and unusual. The guy was fucking murdered. He makes claims about Floyd that he cannot substantiate. If you can’t believe him on one, then why believe any of the rest. At least without vetting each claim for accuracy, a task no one has the time for.
He claims: “sanitizing notorious figures like George Floyd.” In what universe is unknown-before-being-murdered George Floyd notorious? Trump has many more felonies; is he notorious too?
He then claims: “Figures like then-Vice President Kamala Harris eulogized him as a “gentle giant,” This is a bald-faced LIE: Kamala Harris cannot be found on record as eulogizing him as a gentle giant. She didn’t even give the eulogy. This egregious lie, supports that Horist did not do his research. He did not check the facts he was given. And if he blew this one, what else did he screw up here?
Kamala Harris spoke often on Floyd and racial injustice, with Cory Booker following Floyd’s murder for example, later a family meeting.
Floyd’s eulogy was given by Reverand Sharpton. And others. Not Harris. A lie.
The person who referred to George Floyd as a “gentle giant” was his lifelong friend, Christopher Harris, not Kamala Harris. Many media sources, a plethora of fact checks all confirmed Floyd’s friends and family often used the nickname “gentle giant.” Christopher Harris and Donnell Cooper, childhood friends from Houston, Texas confirmed that.
Horist cannot find any Harris quotes to indicate she ever used the term.
About his criminal record and second chances. First, he’s an addict and fights addiction his entire life. Horist seems to not mind that he dies, but the overdoses Trump falsely claims to stop are sacrosanct. He bases his view that Floyd is a violent habitual criminal on the fact that between 1997 and 2005, Floyd was convicted of eight crimes serving four years with a plea bargain for a 2007 aggravated robbery in a home invasion. After his 2013 parole, he became a mentor in his religious community with Resurrection Houston, a Christian church and ministry, where he mentored young men and posted anti-violence videos to social media. He delivered meals to senior citizens and volunteered with other projects, such as the Angel By Nature Foundation, a charity founded by rapper Trae tha Truth. Later, Floyd became involved with a ministry that brought men from the Third Ward to Minnesota in a church-work program with drug rehabilitation and job placement services. He moved to Minneapolis and struggled to keep jobs and drug-free during covid.
A friend of Floyd noted he “had made some mistakes that cost him some years of his life” noting the turnaround through religion that Horist seems to ignore in his zeal to dump on Democrats.
In MN, still fighting his drug demons, he completed a 90-day rehabilitation program at the Turning Point program there. He took up security work at Harbor Light Center, a Salvation Army homeless shelter. He lost and got jobs as he battled drug addiction and went through periods of relapse and sobriety.
He made a video for neighborhood youth reminding folks of his own “shortcomings” and “flaws” and that he was not better than anyone else expressing disdain for the violence taking place in the community, asking neighbors to put down their weapons and remember that they were loved by him and God.
Notorious my sweet white ass.
While Horist focuses on Floyd’s crimes of 8 years prior to 2005; crimes for which he served the time, and seemed rehabilitated sans his war with his addictions, Horist cannot give him even a scintilla of a chance, much less a second chance, but instead vilifies him for time served. Yet, he votes for a Felon to be his King. Go figure. Harris never called him a gentle giant and did not give the eulogy. Given the misstatements of fact:
BUSTED
So, there ’tis!
Nobody loves criminals more than Trump. He pardoned 1500 insurrectionists, he got Ghislane Maxwell transferred to a cushy prison and wants to pardon her. He is ready to pardon the convicted drug felon who was the president of Honduras, and he is trying his best to hide the Epstein files to protect his child rapist friends. And the GOP has been behind him all the way.
GOP = Gang Of Pedophiles!
Sorry tom. You’re cunt lost the election. And rightly so.
Tom … You are still alive!!!! Your response is a bad case of whataboutism. Trump and his pardons are a worthy subject for discourse, but my commentary was about Democrats coddling criminals on a broad scale and over a long time. I thought I made a pretty good fact based case. Apparently you did,, too, since you failed to address any points in the commentary. More old man ranting completely off subject. But welcome back anyway. We miss the other half of Statler and Waldorf.
So true Tom! I couldn’t stomach reading all of lyin Larry’s bullshit, but I did notice he deplored the left standing up for Kilmer. If that man is guilty of such horrible things why won’t the DOJ just try him? Instead Krusty Gnome just wants to deport him. Larry’s wasted brain just believes what the current regime tells him to believe and never looks at the other side. Another example of ‘look over there, not on my side where things are ten times worse…’
Tom I could go back several years and point out some really bad people pardoned by democrats. Starting with retard joe and going back several decades. This issue isn’t really hot button. But pardons from any president or governor should only be for certain circumstances. Mainly legal cases that prove unjust incarceration. I’m a proud republican and I’m not a damned pediphile. You would never want to call me that to my face. I would flip a coin and see if I kicked your ass or made you prove it in court. Would probably settle for both
I was a Democrat then I grew up,
Harold,, you elected a felon, a sex abusing, tax cheating, defamer of women with over 60 felonies himself and his company. Hundreds of millions in fines. He is personally a felon, he is a felon in business. His top lawyer, CFO and a dozen other Trump associates went to jail. Much of his 2020 campaign management team went to jail. After his yuge 1/6 rally, over 1,500 lost souls went to jail, many of them blamed Trump in court. Were they lying to save their ass, or did they tell the truth, the whole truth. Trump never sued for defamation, sounded pretty defamatory to me. Or true. He pardoned them all except his lawyer where he went way out of this way to put him BACK into jail after he got a covid escape, because Don was in a snit.
That’s right, Mr. Law and Oder pardoned an entire army of criminal supporters. He supported the 140 wounded Police by freeing cop beaters. At least a dozen felons who received a presidential pardon for crimes related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack have since been arrested, charged, or sentenced for new or pre-existing crimes, some of which were committed after their pardons were issued for:
• Plotting murder of FBI agents. One pardoned man, Edward Kelley, was convicted of conspiring to murder the FBI agents who investigated his Jan. 6 case and was sentenced to life in prison.
• Child sexual assault and possession of child sexual abuse material. At least one individual, Theodore Middendorf, was already sentenced to 19 years for child sexual assault and another, Andrew Taake, was arrested on charges of online solicitation of a minor and possession of child sexual abuse material.
• Threatening elected officials. Christopher Moynihan, a pardoned rioter, was arrested in October 2025 for allegedly threatening to kill House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries.
• Reckless homicide. Shane Jason Woods was convicted of multiple counts, including reckless homicide and driving under the influence, related to a 2022 wrong-way crash.
• Illegal firearms possession. Daniel Ball was rearrested on federal gun possession charges shortly after his release from prison, as his prior domestic violence conviction made his possession of a firearm illegal.
• Burglary and theft. Brent John Holdridge was arrested for allegedly stealing tens of thousands of dollars worth of industrial copper wire.
• Other charges include burglary and vandalism.
• In one incident, a pardoned rioter, Matthew Huttle, was fatally shot by police after allegedly resisting arrest during a traffic stop while armed and threatening to kill yet another cop Trump did not support.
This is just the 1/6 crap and does not even cover all the drug dealers, pedophiles, and worse he has let go. And who is pulling the strings? Trump admitted he did not even know the Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández in for 45 years for 400 tons of coke. He just Biden-air-signed the paper or maybe he was asleep at the wheel again.
On 1/6, 140 cops were injured. Many will never recover. He let the criminals who did that go. How do the cops, prosecutors feel? How about the folks who spent years catching Hernandez, the cops with risked death to catch him. How do they feel about Trump’s support for law and oder?
Harold: you SHOW US the Democratic list that matches that Trump short list and then I will up your bet with Trump’s drug dealer pardons proving Trump frees the monied drug kingpins but murders the lowly mules. Or, in the case of two guys rescued from the bombed boat —- he sent those drug mules home. Why?
Dunger it’s time for you to get help. And Trump is our president even with bullshit charges and lawfare. But your Marxist party couldn’t stop him. So go back to sleep and STFU
Sucketh: prove anything I said is wrong, a fabrication, or a lie. You can’t and never have.
You just all hat and no cow.
Ineffective, under educated, inaccurate, just cannot toe the line with me.
I am frank. I am danger. At least to fools in love with a felon.
“Trump is our president even with bullshit charges and lawfare.” Guess you have to say that to cover your ass for voting for a felon to be your king. Enjoy the taxation without representation, end of the rule of law, cruel and unusual punishment, inflation, murder on the high seas, 22 million Americans kicked off insurance, 1,800 criminal pardons including major drug kingpins, pedophiles, cop beaters and sex offenders, as long as they have the cash. And yes, under your felon King, we now charged with human rights violations.
Your only answer is “bullshit charges.” Yeah, bullshit that we made stick. And he’s O and 3 on James now. Blew Comey too. He’s asleep at the wheel, literally. He does less and less every day. His hand is green, his ankles balloons, as he hawks watches that don’t keep time on FOX. Did you buy yours? Do you know what time it is: the wrong time according to your watch :>)
Keep throwing the dung, and I will keep responding with facts that you cannot disprove. Abrego is free again. James is too. Guard found illegal in California, Chicago is next. Now, free the Epstein files even IF they show the young Trumps mimicking Prince Andrew with Epstein.
11 months until we shut this shit down.
Dunger is having PMS again. Prove it? You can’t prove shit you moron. And your asshole party will not get both chambers of Congress. I really don’t believe that they will get the majority back in any chamber. But who would have thought that the 2020 election would have been stolen? People like you are a joke and a disgrace.
Sucketh whines and whine but proves nothing. Cries like a baby. A wittle white trailer trash baby deplorable. He CLAIMS I have PMS, a condition that affects females. BUSTED. Sorry chum, me and my hanging cod say so. Ask your (fill in the female relation of your choice here, that’s what THEY do).
He says I can’t prove shit, funny since he tries to demean me by calling me Dunger, not Danger, then again, he’s probably just linguistically challenged by a lack of education. He misses the fact that, even upon request, upon a dare, he has NEVER PROVEN anything I said, of the facts, as wrong. He may disagree with my opinions, that is his right even as a pin-head.
I have listed umpteen expert sources, citations, and links, he has never refuted one except by broad brushing all as lies or fake news. The guy does not believe in science or medicine so pretty hard to have an intelligent conversation as there appears to be no intelligent life here.
Come on you low life POS, take me on with actual facts and leave your brain farts at the door. Come up with an intelligent argument and skip the whining grade school taunts to yourself.
Come on tough guy —– let’s see if you can muster a factual comeback for once in your very sorry life here.
I call myself Frank Danger, you call me Dunger, because that’s where you live.