Select Page

We Are What We Eat

We Are What We Eat

The headline is an old mantra of the dieters.  That is not how I mean it, however.  I am not speaking of belly fat or thunder thighs.  I am talking about ethnicity.  Yes, ethnicity.

Readers of my commentaries already know that I am a staunch critic of political correctness and identity politics as they are being defined and used today.  The authoritarian left – which has great influence in the Democratic Party and the so-called news media – uses ethnic and racial differences as a fault line – used to create adversarial competition among groups.  Essentially it is a hostile battle between their side and the other side.

Ironically, in the name of “identity,” the left wipes out cultural identities. 

Why?  Because it is easier to manage and control larger amorphous groups as opposed to a scattering of smaller less homogenized communities.

For obvious reasons, Black Americans have been lumped into one large ethnic group. This is mostly because their more specific national origins in Africa have been lost over the past 400 years.  For political reasons, anyone who had the least bit of Negro features or ancestral history are summarily and arbitrarily declared to be African Americans – a monolithic interest group. 

That applies to people like my Black daughter, whose ancestors have lived in Jamaica for at least 300 hundred years.  In today’s America, she is considered an African American, not a Jamaican — except among her family and friends.

The left has also homogenized the Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Colombians and Peruvians into one big group to be known as “Hispanics.”   Likewise, all the Chinese, Vietnamese, Japanese and  Indonesians are to be lumped into a bland mass of “Asians.”  The original residents of what is now the United States of America came from a wide variety of distinct tribes, but they are now all “Native Americans.”

As if that is not bad enough, the left has now created only two competing populations according to political fault lines.  Republicans are a bunch of White folks – with no distinction among those with German, Italian or French ancestry. 

Politically juxtaposed is an illogical mass of “people of color” – who are claimed to be the beneficiaries of Democratic Party progressivism.   All the distinctive cultures by which people define THEMSELVES are canceled in this new racist re-assemblage of the citizenry.

So … that is where the title above comes in. 

Think of cultures by the unique foods they prepare.  There is a difference between Mexican and Peruvian food … Chinese and Japanese food … French and German food.  That is where you find the real ethnic cultures –the real identities.  Not the phony political identity determined by Big Brother politicians.

If you are among those who accept the new paradigm of political ethnic blending, the next time you go out for dinner, see if you can find a people-of-color restaurant.  What would be on the menu?  If you abide by another bit of left-wing nonsense, you will find nothing because preparing foods outside your own ancestry is “ethnic appropriation” according to the nutty left.

To the extent we are related to an ancestry, we should celebrate it – and share it.  That is the richness of diversity.  Not crushing it into a colorless mass – “colorless” as in bland and uninteresting, but highly controllable.

So, there ‘tis.

About The Author

Larry Horist

So, there ‘tis… The opinions, perspectives and analyses of businessman, conservative writer and political strategist Larry Horist. Larry has an extensive background in economics and public policy. For more than 40 years, he ran his own Chicago based consulting firm. His clients included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman. He has served as a consultant to the Nixon White House and travelled the country as a spokesman for President Reagan’s economic reforms. Larry professional emphasis has been on civil rights and education. He was consultant to both the Chicago and the Detroit boards of education, the Educational Choice Foundation, the Chicago Teachers Academy and the Chicago Academy for the Performing Arts. Larry has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress, and has lectured at colleges and universities, including Harvard, Northwestern and DePaul. He served as Executive Director of the City Club of Chicago, where he led a successful two-year campaign to save the historic Chicago Theatre from the wrecking ball. Larry has been a guest on hundreds of public affairs talk shows, and hosted his own program, “Chicago In Sight,” on WIND radio. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries have appeared on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He is praised by audiences for his style, substance and sense of humor. Larry retired from his consulting business to devote his time to writing. His books include a humorous look at collecting, “The Acrapulators’ Guide”, and a more serious history of the Democratic Party’s role in de facto institutional racism, “Who Put Blacks in That PLACE? -- The Long Sad History of the Democratic Party’s Oppression of Black Americans ... to This Day”. Larry currently lives in Boca Raton, Florida.

1 Comment

  1. Ben

    When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. … They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” I feel the inclusiveness!
    I was under the impression that the right wanted immigrants to assimilate to our culture? “Speak American” but you are saying they should hold on to their personal identity? I live in The International City. Growing up we had a social club for every ethnic group. Then white flight happened. I still live here, and enjoy the multitude of different ethnic restaurants and cultural activities. It is the great joy of our City. It’s what makes our City, ours. Our citizens are much more equipped to deal with the multiracial and international business climate in today’s world than a monolithic farm community member.

    But sure, blame the left.
    Come on Larry, you are better than this. You seem to decry the idea that the left lumps the right into one group while you devote article after article attempting to do the same to the left. Pick a lane.