Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Trump Announces Withdrawal from Syria

<p>President Trump on Wednesday announced the immediate withdrawal of US troops from Syria&period; The announcement&comma; delivered on Twitter&comma; came as a complete surprise to lawmakers and Pentagon officials&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;We have won against ISIS&comma;” tweeted Trump&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;We’ve beaten them and we’ve beaten them badly&semi; we’ve taken back the land&period; And now it’s time for our troops to come back home&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The announcement was met with bipartisan outrage&comma; with lawmakers on both sides insisting withdrawal would cede Syria to Iran and Russia and facilitate the reemergence of ISIS&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong> According to the most recent estimates&comma; roughly 30&comma;000 ISIS militants remain in Iraq and Syria&period;<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;&lbrack;Withdrawal&rsqb; will lead to devastating consequences for our nation&comma; the region&comma; and throughout the world&comma;” argued GOP Senator Lindsey Graham&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;It will make it more difficult to recruit future partners willing to confront radical Islam&period; It will also be seen by Iran and other bad actors as a sign of American weakness in the efforts to contain Iranian expansion&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Others have suggested the decision was a transactional arrangement with foreign powers &&num;8211&semi; possibly part of an arms deal with Turkey or recompense to President Erdogan for the killing of Jamal Khashoggi&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;&lbrack;Withdrawal&rsqb; serves Russian interests&period; It serves Iranian interests&period; It takes the heat off of ISIS and does a favor for Turkey&period; How does it serve US interests&quest;” asked CNN anchor Jim Sciutto&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;I would not call this withdrawal&comma; I would call this a surrender&comma;” added CNN national security analyst Samantha Vinograd&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The president’s decision is surrendering obviously to Russian&comma; Iranian&comma; Turkish&comma; and Assad’s own designs in Syria&comma; but it’s also surrendering to the very strong likelihood that ISIS or other terrorist groups will be resurgent in Syria based upon his decision&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>Author&&num;8217&semi;s Note&colon;<&sol;strong> All of the above arguments are valid&comma; but the way I see it&comma; the United States had no business in Syria from the beginning&period; The only thing our continued presence in Syria will accomplish is risking more American lives&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&&num;8212&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><em>The US intervened in the Syrian Civil War under President Obama in 2014&period; Troops stationed there have been fighting ISIS and assisting the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;rebel” forces trying to take down Syrian President Bashar al-Assad&period;<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><em>The conflict has also exacerbated tensions between the US and Russia&comma; which support opposing sides&period;<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version