Site icon The Punching Bag Post

The Steele Dossier is baaack … and so is he

&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Just as the phony Dossier that kicked off the phony Russian collusion investigation was fading into the background&comma; it is being brought back into the mainstream news – this time by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">For reasons that are not clear&comma; Stephanopoulos conducted a one-on-one interview with Christopher Steele – a former British intelligence officer and the guy who reportedly prepared the document based on information he obtained from Russian operatives&period;&nbsp&semi; Steele&comma; who has stayed in the shadows all these years&comma; has suddenly decided to talk about the Dossier&period;&nbsp&semi; Why now&quest; Is a good question&period;&nbsp&semi; Unfortunately&comma; Stephanopoulos never got an answer to that one&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">And why would ABC find the interview newsworthy at this time&quest;&nbsp&semi; Was there more salacious stuff to be revealed&quest;&nbsp&semi; Apparently not&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The fraudulent Steele Dossier was allegedly passed on to Hillary Clinton campaign operatives – and from there it went to the FBI&period;&nbsp&semi; Then FBI Director James Comey &amp&semi; Co&period; jumped on the document to gain permission to surveil Trump operatives&period;&nbsp&semi; They used the unvetted and unverified Dossier to launch the infamous Russian collusion investigation which &&num;8212&semi; after 18 months and &dollar;35 million of taxpayer money – determined that no one associated with the Trump campaign had conspired with Russian meddling in the 2016 election&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The Dossier-triggered scandal may arguably be the most successful dirty trick in presidential campaign history&period;&nbsp&semi; As later events would reveal&comma; it was the Clinton campaign that paid for the bogus Dossier – and then hand fed it to operatives in the FBI who were predisposed to undermine the Trump presidency in the hope of an impeachment and removal from office&period;&nbsp&semi; That was the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Insurance policy” that the married FBI agent Peter Strzok alluded to in texts with his paramour&comma; fellow FBI agent Lisa Page – who was emotionally unhinged over Trump’s election&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately for the Clinton folks&comma; they left their fingerprints all over the Dossier&period;&nbsp&semi; After it was totally discredited&comma; the spotlight was turned on those who created the hoax&period;&nbsp&semi; Those involved are still under investigations today&period;&nbsp&semi; It is no small irony that those who set up the phony Dossier to falsely accuse Trump of conspiring with Russians &&num;8212&semi; the Clinton campaign &&num;8212&semi; conspired with Russians&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">If Democrats and the media thought that the re-emergence of Steele would breathe life into the old story&comma; they may be badly mistaken&period;&nbsp&semi; Steele is far from a credible witness&period;&nbsp&semi; He made one concession that brought down the credibility of everything he said in that interview – and everything that he said in the past&period;&nbsp&semi; And – for that matter – everything the Clinton campaign&comma; the media and the anti-Trump cabal within the FBI had said over many months&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Steele said that he was not 100 percent certain that the claims made in the Dossier were 100 percent true&period;&nbsp&semi; Could he assure the public that ANY of the damaging claims were true&quest;&nbsp&semi; Nope&period;&nbsp&semi; He did believe that Trump’s then- personal attorney Michael Cohen was in Prague&comma; as detailed in the Dossier&period;&nbsp&semi; While Steele said he thought it was possibly true&comma; he could not explain – when asked by Stephanopoulos – why all the hard evidence proved that Cohen could not possibly have been in Prague – and why Cohen – who had a falling out with Trump&&num;8211&semi;&nbsp&semi; has not supported that detail&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Steele still believes that the reported so-called &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;golden showers” tape exists&period;&nbsp&semi; That is the one that reportedly shows women prostitutes urinating on Trump&period;&nbsp&semi; It has never surfaced – according to Steele’s personal conspiracy theory – because Russian President Vladimir Putin was using it to blackmail Trump&period;&nbsp&semi; Trump has dismissed the existence of the tape saying that everyone knows he is a bit of a germaphobe&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">If Steele’s interview was designed to resurrect all the old idle debunked gossip about Trump&comma; it may backfire&period;&nbsp&semi; Revisiting those issues is more likely to expose the skullduggery of the Clinton campaign and the unethical – if not criminal – complicity of the FBI just as the ongoing investigations into those matters are beginning to mature&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version