Site icon The Punching Bag Post

New Election Study Finds 255,000 “Excess” Votes for Biden 

&NewLine;<p>President Joe Biden received as many as 255&comma;000 &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;excess” votes in Democratic-controlled areas of swing states during the 2020 presidential election&comma; claims a peer-reviewed study published in the journal <em>Public Choice&period; <&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><strong>Keep in mind Biden won Arizona&comma; Georgia&comma; Michigan&comma; Nevada&comma; Pennsylvania&comma; and Wisconsin by a mere 313&comma;253 votes&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The study&comma; which sought to determine whether Democrat-backed changes to election procedure during the pandemic allowed new opportunities for fraud&comma; examined voter data at the precinct level in red and blue areas of swing states during the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections&period; The study was conducted by John R&period; Lott&comma; a political commentator and gun rights advocate who leads the Crime Prevention Research Center&period; Lott&comma; one of the most-cited economists on the planet&comma; said he waited nearly a year for his research to be fully reviewed before going to the press&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>By comparing data at the precinct level&comma; Lott discovered that voter turnout in GOP areas generally increased while voter turnout in Democratic areas decreased <strong>except in places where voter fraud was suspected&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;strong>Based on Lott’s data&comma; President Biden received 255&comma;000 more votes in 2020 than should be expected&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;More heavily Democratic counties actually had a slightly lower turnout in 2020&comma; except for counties where vote fraud was alleged&comma;” explains Lott&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;And yet you only had huge increases in turnout where vote fraud was alleged&period;” <em>Lott adds that the 255&comma;000 figure is an underestimate and the true number may be as high as 368&comma;000&period; <&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>By comparing blue and red precincts that neighbor each other in areas where fraud is suspected&comma; Lott also discovered a much higher rate of mail-in voting in Democratic-controlled areas&period; <strong>There is no reason for this discrepancy and it was not present during the 2016 election&period;<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;You’re comparing two tiny areas that are very homogenous&comma; very similar to each other&comma; across the street from each other&comma; and the thing that differs from these two&comma; for the absentee ballots&comma; is where the ballots were counted&comma;” explains Lott&period; In most cases&comma; in-person votes are counted at the local precinct and absentee ballots are counted at a country’s central election office&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>In Fulton County&comma; Georgia&comma; Lott identified an &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;unusual drop-off” in GOP votes amounting to 11&comma;350 votes &lpar;almost equal to the margin by which Biden defeated Trump in GA&rpar;&period; Data from Fulton also suggests up to 2&comma;423 unregistered voters and 2&comma;560 felons were allowed to participate in the election&period; There was also a suspicious situation in Fulton wherein a burst water pipe necessitated the removal of poll watchers&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>In Allegheny County&comma; Pennsylvania&comma; votes were skewed when Democratic officials went against state law to seek out and offer voters who had submitted incorrect ballots a chance to correct them&period; This move was not repeated by GOP officials&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>If confirmed by other scholars&comma; Lott’s study could breathe new life into GOP claims of voter fraud that have largely been dismissed by courts due to lack of proof&period;&nbsp&semi;&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Time after time&comma; the news media keeps on saying there’s no evidence of vote fraud here&comma;” continues Lott&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;I think it’s at least a little bit harder for them to go and claim that&period;”&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Lott confirmed his study was not designed to overturn or invalidate the 2020 election&comma; but to spur action on voting reform&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;We have a real problem that needs to be dealt with&period; Americans must have confidence in future elections&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><strong>Sources&colon;<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;washingtontimes&period;com&sol;news&sol;2022&sol;mar&sol;28&sol;joe-biden-got-255000-excess-votes-fraud-tainted-sw&sol;">Biden got 255&comma;000 &OpenCurlyQuote;excess&&num;8217&semi; votes in fraud-tainted swing states in 2020&comma; study finds<&sol;a><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;washingtonexaminer&period;com&sol;opinion&sol;washington-secrets&sol;new-report-255-000-excess-votes-for-biden-in-six-key-2020-states">New report&colon; 255&comma;000 &OpenCurlyQuote;excess votes’ for Biden in six key 2020 states<&sol;a><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;dailysignal&period;com&sol;2022&sol;03&sol;28&sol;study-raises-new-questions-about-2020-election-results-in-6-states&sol;">Study Raises New Questions About 2020 Election Results in 6 States&nbsp&semi;<&sol;a><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version