Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Kristen Clarke should be fired from DOJ for perjury

&NewLine;<p>Kristen Clarke holds a high position in the Department of Justice&period;&nbsp&semi; She is the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights&period;&nbsp&semi; She was appointed to the post by President Biden&period;&nbsp&semi; It is a position that requires Senate confirmation&period;&nbsp&semi; She got it in 2021&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>It was recently reported that Clarke had committed perjury during her Senate confirmation hearing – in writing and in testimony&comma;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton posed this question to Clarke during the hearing&period;&nbsp&semi; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Since becoming a legal adult&comma; have you ever been arrested for or accused of committing a violent crime against any person&quest;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Clarke answered&comma; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;no&period;”&nbsp&semi; in a similar written question as part of the vetting process&comma; Clarke also answered &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;no&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Weeell &&num;8230&semi; It turns out that she was arrested and charged with &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;committing a violent crime against” another person&period;&nbsp&semi; She was charged with &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;domestic violence” &&num;8212&semi; specifically threatening her husband with a knife&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The case was dropped – an example of prosecutorial discretion&comma; which raises questions about the rule-of-law when it comes to politically connected individuals&period;&nbsp&semi; She subsequently filed an order to have both the court and police arrest records expunged&period;&nbsp&semi; She got it&period;&nbsp&semi; &lpar;I have worked with clients and friends on the issue of expungement and learned it is VERY difficult to get records expunged unless you have what is called &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;clout&period;”&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Clarke’s arrest was not due to youthful indiscretion&comma; it occurred in 2006&comma; when she was 31 years old&comma; and the final expungement was granted in 2008&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Clarke’s arrest was reported in the press earlier this year&period;&nbsp&semi; Initially&comma; the Department of Justice ignored the reports and refused to comment&period;&nbsp&semi; But the story spread&comma; and a number of Senators who had voted for Clarke’s confirmation expressed their concerns&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>That is when Clarke offered her explanation for lying to Congress in sworn testimony in an exclusive statement to CNN&period; She said she did not reveal her arrest because she was a victim of domestic abuse&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>&lpar;Whoa&excl;&nbsp&semi; I guess if you cannot come up with good excuses for committing perjury&comma; you have to come up with a bad one – and that is a very bad one&period; It makes no sense&period;&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>CNN gave her sympathetic coverage&comma; ignoring the foundational fact that she had committed perjury two times on a significant matter&period;&nbsp&semi; The Network flipped off the matter as nothing more than a right-wing &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;pounce&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The DOJ&comma; itself&comma; took up the irrational excuse&comma; confirming that she did commit perjury&comma; but it was understandable in view of the domestic abuse she suffered&period;&nbsp&semi; There has not been a scintilla of evidence that she was a victim of domestic abuse – and her husband denies the accusations&period;&nbsp&semi; The only fact we have to go on is that SHE was arrested and charged with domestic abuse – with a knife&comma; no less&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>We can recall that President Clinton escaped removal from office but was still held accountable in court for his perjury&period;&nbsp&semi; He lost his law license over it&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Clarke was confirmed by the Senate despite a paper she wrote at Harvard suggesting that Blacks were superior to Whites physically and intellectually because of the melanin&period;&nbsp&semi; She claimed that the paper was meant to be satirical&period;&nbsp&semi; A later fact check by <em>Newsweek<&sol;em> did not find anything to suggest it was humorous&period;&nbsp&semi; Clarke’s racist theory was subsequently supported by Harvard’s Black Students Association&comma; which called for further investigation of it&period; &nbsp&semi;Hardly the response to a joke&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Even if you disregard Clarke’s Harvard paper nothing more than the excesses of youth&comma; perjury by an adult person in the legal profession being confirmed for a high-level job in the Department of Justice is more than enough reason to terminate Clarke&period;&nbsp&semi; It is more likely&comma; however&comma; that the Clarke case will be another example of a two-tiered justice system when it comes to cases involving political left-wing Democrats&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version