Select Page

Illinois Primaries Drag Democratic Party Further to the Left

Illinois Primaries Drag Democratic Party Further to the Left

The Illinois primary elections on March 17 delivered a stark message for anyone willing to face reality without the rose-colored glasses of progressive spin. From a conservative viewpoint, the results confirm what many of us have warned about for years. The Democratic Party in the Land of Lincoln is not merely drifting left – it is sprinting full speed into the arms of radical socialism, nominating candidates who will accelerate the very policies that have turned one of America’s most promising states into a high-tax, high-crime, population-bleeding cautionary tale. Chicago, once known as “The City that Works,” will take the brunt of the leftward drift.

Governor J.B. Pritzker’s progressive machine rolled on, but the real story lies in the open seats and the choices made by Democratic primary voters. They did not opt for moderation or pragmatism. They chose more government, more spending, more identity politics, and more of the failed experiments that have driven businesses out, crushed working families with sky-high property taxes, and left Chicago’s streets awash in violence. This is not progress. This is ideological suicide – and the voters just handed the Democrats more rope.

Start with the marquee race: the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate seat long held by retiring Dick Durbin. Lt. Governor Juliana Stratton crushed the field with about 40 percent of the vote, besting Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi at roughly 33 percent and Congresswoman Robin Kelly at 18 percent. Stratton is not some centrist compromise. She’s the embodiment of Pritzker-style radicalism – pushing Medicare for All, a $25 minimum wage that will hammer small businesses and entry-level workers, expansive criminal justice “reforms” that prioritize criminals over victims, more sanctuary for illegal aliens, and the full menu of left-wing social engineering. Krishnamoorthi, for all his flaws, represented a slightly more establishment lane on economic matters. Democrat voters rejected that restraint. This leftward lurch in a state already groaning under Pritzker’s third-term ambitions tells you everything. Illinois Democrats are not listening to the exodus of taxpayers fleeing to red states. They are not addressing the budgetary crisis, but rather, they are doubling down on taxing and spending.

On the Republican side, Don Tracy secured the nomination – a solid conservative who at least offers a fighting chance to highlight the contrasts in November. But in deep-blue Illinois, the real drama – and the real danger – played out on the Democratic ballot. The same pattern repeated itself across down-ballot races.

Nowhere was the ideological shift more telling – or more symbolically damning – than in the 2nd Congressional District — a heavily Black, working-class District on Chicago’s South Side and southern suburbs. Cook County Commissioner Donna Miller won the Democratic primary with approximately 40 percent of the vote — halting the comeback bid of former Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. The son of the preacher man garnered only 29 percent of the vote.

Jackson Jr. tried to mount a redemption narrative after his 2012 resignation and subsequent conviction on campaign finance fraud charges. He spoke of personal growth, reaching disenfranchised Black men, and applying hard-earned lessons from incarceration and family struggles. He leaned on the family legacy that has defined Democratic politics in Black Chicago for generations. He also learned that the Jackson name was not as powerful in Chicago’s Black community as the out-of-town new media would have us believe. For those who know Chicago, the fact that it was Black voters who rejected Jackson Jr. comes as no surprise.

Instead, they chose Miller, whose platform aligns squarely with the newer, more aggressive progressive wave. Miller champions “healthcare as a human right,” codifying expansive abortion access through Planned Parenthood priorities, gun control measures, climate mandates, and the same big-government equity agenda that has dominated failed Democratic governance for decades

As a conservative who has long documented the Democratic Party’s role in institutional racism and perpetuating generational welfare dependency in minority communities, I find this outcome both ironic and tragic. For generations, Black voters have been told the path forward lies with ever-more progressive Democrats. Yet those same policies – expansive welfare, soft-on-crime approaches, failing urban schools, limited job opportunities, and economic interventions that stifle opportunity – have kept too many trapped in segregated communities with cycles of poverty and despair for generations.

But instead of turning toward conservative solutions that emphasize school choice, economic freedom, better employment, and safer streets, the District Democrat voters simply traded one Black plantation overseer for one even more aligned with the current leftward dependency policies. It does not bode well for the communities that have borne the brunt of these oppressive failed policies for generations.

The pattern held elsewhere in the open House seats created by longtime incumbents stepping aside. In the 9th District, Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss – a self-described progressive with a track record of left-leaning governance – prevailed in a crowded field that included a younger, even more insurgent progressive challenger in Kat Abughazaleh and a more moderate state senator in Laura Fine. The race turned bitter over issues like Israel policy, campaign finance, and how aggressively to confront the Trump administration. Biss’s victory, despite super PAC spending against him, underscores how the Democrat primary voters in that District rewarded ideological purity over pragmatism. Similar dynamics played out in other Chicago-area districts, where progressive voices gained ground amid debates over immigration, policing, and economic redistribution.

Meanwhile, on the Republican gubernatorial side, Darren Bailey – a proven conservative voice who has challenged Pritzker’s agenda before – secured the GOP nomination. Bailey offers a platform of fiscal restraint, pro-business policies, tough-on-crime measures, and a rejection of the sanctuary that have strained resources, increased violent crime, and created social division. In short, policies that can actually improve the situation. Democrats offer the failed Detroit method that brought that once great city to its economic knees.

In a general election rematch scenario with Pritzker, Bailey represents the common-sense pushback Illinois desperately needs. But with Democratic primaries producing nominees like Stratton and Miller, the fall ballot will present a crystal-clear choice – a continued shift to incremental socialism versus a conservative course correction. Unfortunately, Democrats are likely to prevail in November.

Step back and the bigger picture emerges with painful clarity. Illinois already ranks near the bottom in economic freedom, with the nation’s highest property taxes, crushing pension liabilities, and a Chicago plagued by record levels of violence under progressive prosecutors, soft-on-crime policies, and sanctuary for illegal (including criminal) aliens.

Businesses and residents continue their exodus to lower-tax, safer red states. Population loss is not an anomaly. It is the predictable result of left-wing governance. Yet primary voters, cocooned in their ideological echo chamber, nominated candidates who vow even more spending on socialized medicine, higher wage mandates that result in job losses (especially for young and minority workers), and identity-driven policies that divide rather than unite. They will double down on their sanctuary policies and opposition to ICE. Defunding law enforcement is still a strong sentiment in the modern Democratic Party.

This leftward shift is not unique to Illinois, but the state’s deep-blue status makes it a laboratory for what national Democrats might pursue if unchecked. Media coverage downplays the radicalism, framing it as “diversity” or “generational change.” Conservatives know better. These nominees are not evolving the party. They are entrenching its worst instincts – the same instincts that have presided over decades of urban decline while blaming everyone but their own failed philosophy.

Illinois Republicans have their work cut out. The general election will test whether enough independents and disillusioned Democrats recognize the warning signs. Pritzker’s machine and the progressive nominees will flood the airwaves with promises of equity, compassion, and more goodies from Uncle Sam. The reality is like to be more taxes, more crime, and an increase in the exodus. Voters have a chance to reject the slippery slope of creeping socialism and its inevitable consequences. The Illinois primaries are over. The leftward lurch is real, and the consequences for Illinois will be severe. On that you can rest assured.

So, there ‘tis.

About The Author

Larry Horist

So, there ‘tis… The opinions, perspectives and analyses of businessman, conservative writer and political strategist Larry Horist. Larry has an extensive background in economics and public policy. For more than 40 years, he ran his own Chicago based consulting firm. His clients included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman. He has served as a consultant to the Nixon White House and travelled the country as a spokesman for President Reagan’s economic reforms. Larry professional emphasis has been on civil rights and education. He was consultant to both the Chicago and the Detroit boards of education, the Educational Choice Foundation, the Chicago Teachers Academy and the Chicago Academy for the Performing Arts. Larry has testified as an expert witness before numerous legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress, and has lectured at colleges and universities, including Harvard, Northwestern and DePaul. He served as Executive Director of the City Club of Chicago, where he led a successful two-year campaign to save the historic Chicago Theatre from the wrecking ball. Larry has been a guest on hundreds of public affairs talk shows, and hosted his own program, “Chicago In Sight,” on WIND radio. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries have appeared on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He is praised by audiences for his style, substance and sense of humor. Larry retired from his consulting business to devote his time to writing. His books include a humorous look at collecting, “The Acrapulators’ Guide”, and a more serious history of the Democratic Party’s role in de facto institutional racism, “Who Put Blacks in That PLACE? -- The Long Sad History of the Democratic Party’s Oppression of Black Americans ... to This Day”. Larry currently lives in Boca Raton, Florida.

6 Comments

  1. frank danger

    Funny, I did not read Larry’s screed because what does he know about Illinois Democratic politics, but I did note that most Democratic Party experts called out Illinois as being a good example portraying Democrats as favoring the center. This confirms my belief that extreme-right, war-hawk Horist sees the center as being far left; RINOS too.

    “Even Democrats want the party to move to the middle.” Harold Ford Jr. weighs in after far-left progressive influencer Kat Abughazaleh loses Illinois congressional primary.” Facebook.

    “Squad-backed progressives hit with ‘cold shower’ as moderates win Illinois primaries” FOX News; Larry’s market leader

    Plenty more where those came from as experts tend to disagree with Larry’s rant.

    Reply
    • Uncle tom

      Dunger that’s fantastic. As in Mike f. Most people don’t like leftists. But a little more right of center would be great.

      Reply
    • Larry Horist

      Frank Danger … You continue to be uninformed. Actually, I know Illinois better than those you cite. Those who won the primaries were as left-wing as those they defeated. Should they all win, the Illinois congressional delegation and the state house and senate will be more left-wing than ever. Pritzker is fully aligned with the left with the possible exception of Israel — although he hypocritically opposes the war. Tell me the issue positions of the winners that were different from those they defeated. It is the ISSUES, stupid. Yes, a couple of the Squad allied crazies lost, but that does not mean the winners were moderates — maybe just appeared less crazy. I bet none of those distant “experts” you cite could not tell you what issues were involved in the campaigns — and how the winners and losers differed. Lazy journalism.

      Reply
      • Frank danger

        It was a joke you twit.

        Plus, the comments of experts who seemed to disagree with you.

        And I’m sure you think you know more; you may, who cares, pretty safe seats no matter who wins the primary.

        Reply
  2. boone1 JOKER

    There’s no longer a democrat party the party has been taken over by the communist party U.S.A and that’s a fact.

    Reply
  3. Frank danger

    Boone1: the communist party in the us is 10,000 members and isn’t taken anyone or anything over.

    You don’t even know why you think liberals are communist. someone just told you that and being the sheeple you are, you repeat.

    Name one communist law passed by Democrats?

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *