Select Page

Fani Willis’ Case against Trump Based on Illegally Recorded Call

Fani Willis’ Case against Trump Based on Illegally Recorded Call

The legal scene seems to be getting worse for Georgia’s District Attorney (DA) Fani Willis, the political hound servicing the Democratic Party and anti-Trump establishment, who prosecuted President Trump last year for alleged interference in the 2020 presidential election. In the latest series of revelations about Willis, the Democrat DA of Fulton County reportedly based her case against President Trump on a phone call that was recorded in violation of law.

In a new book Find Me the Votes, authors Michael Isikoff and Daniel Klaidman reportedly admit that the controversial phone call on which Willis’ political prosecution of President Trump rests was recorded illegally. The Federalist wrote on Thursday (March 7) that this revelation radically undermines Willis’ case against Trump and his co-defendants. The story wrote:

That means the entire prosecution could crumble with defendants having a new avenue to challenge Democrat lawfare.

The details of the story reveal that the woman who secretly recorded President Trump’s call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2, 2021, was not in Georgia when taping the call.

Jordan Fuchs, a political activist who serves as Raffensperger’s chief of staff, was in Florida, where it is illegal to record a call without all parties to the call consenting to the recording.

The story notes that Fuchs has previously provided leftist newspaper The Washington Post “fabricated quotes” that were later retracted by the paper, though by then those quotes had been used by Democrats in the impeachment President Trump.

Another story broke this week about Willis when Republican Congressman Barry Loudermilk, Chairman of the Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight, released the initial findings on the security failures of January 6, 2021. Back then, House Democrats handpicked a few anti-Trump Republicans to create a sham committee that hid a significant amount of exonerating evidence, thus allowing the weaponized justice system to target President Trump and MAGA Republicans. Among other details, the findings revealed that Fani Willis met and corresponded with the January 6 Committee, but the video recordings of those interactions were deleted. The report wrote:

The prospect of the Select Committee sharing video recordings of witness interviews with Willis but not this Subcommittee remains particularly concerning.

It added that the subcommittee has now opened an investigation into the coordination between Willis and the January 6 Committee to learn more.

Willis, divorced and mother of two children, was already challenged legally for conflict of interest when it was revealed that she recruited her boyfriend, Nathan Wade, as special prosecutor to work on indicting President Trump in 2021. At the time, Wade was a married man and father of two. Through 2021, Willis took Wade on lavish trips and paid him out of seized property fund for the first three months. Wade filed for divorce around the end of 2021 and reportedly left his wife without financial support. Willis did not disclose her sexual/personal relationship with Wade through the course of her investigation and indictment of Trump.

Now faced with allegations of conflict of interest, bribery, perjury, and kickbacks related to the prosecution that cheered Trump-haters, Fani Willis could be removed from the case by Judge Scott McAfee who is presiding over it. The New York Post cited legal analysts that in case she is removed, the case could be “dead in the water.”

About The Author

11 Comments

  1. frank stetson

    The judge threw out the charge that included the famous phone call along with 6 other charges, three of which affected Trump, like the phone call one.

    Sort of makes this story moot.

    • Tom

      I think Ernie is playing catch up!

  2. Darren

    NO, there is a story because Trump & the Nation should not have been in this position to begin with!
    More Democrat lies in the media!
    NO TRUTH IN JURNALISM ( The Democrat Moto )

    • Tom

      “Trump and the Nation”??? Really??? Nobody seems to have been affected in my neighborhood. What do you mean when you say, “the nation”?

      • Dr. Robert Christopher Laity

        When one citizen’s constitutional rights are infringed upon “The Nation” suffers.

  3. Frank stetson

    Darren, take the win, the call is out, the story moot, the case tougher.

    As to the case, the only issue is ehy not sooner.

    If Trump and you had any balls, you’d be screaming to get to court to have your day.

    Or will the meanie democrats piss on your parade again stealing, cheating, and basically having our way with you.

    Hey, you got your abortion bans, trans bans, book bans, gay bans, black history bans, and more. You gotta give us this one

  4. Wes Kussmaul

    Oh, cool, I was wondering how I can pull off an election fraud plan I had in mind.
    Now I know. All I gotta do is have someone illegally record conversations as I implement the plan. No communication without illegally recorded calls. Perfect. I’m gonna be President!!

    Thanks for the tip!!

  5. Tom

    Ernestine, according to every source I have listened to, the core of the case has been preserved. And the six charges that were dismissed were only dismissed for lack of specificity. The DA can choose to go back to the grand jury with the specifics and recharge. I think you wrote an article with your pie in the sky wishes, not reality. For this, you get a Stop The Spin rating of STS-5!!!

  6. frank stetson

    The judge threw the charge with the call. The judge said nothing about the call being illegal.

    Georgia’s law is a “one-party consent” law for making recordings of conversations. Only one party in the conversation needs to give consent. Therefore, in Geogia, one can record conversations or phone calls IF you are a party to the conversation OR if you get permission from one party in the conversation during or in advance.

    The judge did not toss it for legality of the recording.

  7. Jude

    I am so weary of all of the drama. This DA will not be dismissed charged for lying nor her boy toy so get over it. The Trump haters (also America haters) will always be just that. Get on with the program, you either want freedom or you don’t.

  8. ROBERT jACKSON

    ANYONE WITH ONE EYE AND AN A-S HOLE CAN SEE THIS IS A PERSECUTION FOR POLITICAL GAIN!!! I WAS A DEM FOR 38 YEARS AND I SWITCHED IN 2004 WHEN I WATCHED AND DOCUMENTED THE THEFT OF THE GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON!! THE DEM’S LOST THE ELECTION AND THE RECOUNT BUT THEN THEY WENT OUT INTO A REPUB CITY AND FOUND OR PAID FOR A JUDGE TO ALLOW THEM TO PUT UP $750,000 TO GET ANOTHER RECOUNT!! LOW AND BEHOLD IN THE BLUEEST OF COUNTIES, KING COUNTY / SEATTLE THEY MAGICALLY FOUND BOXES OF MISPLACED BALLOTS AND THEY MAGICALLY WERE MOSTLY FOR DEM’S!! WHAT LUCK!!! BUT WHAT GAVE THE THEFT AWAY WAS THE CANDIDATE GREGOIRE GOT ON TV IN NATIONAL NEWS COVERAGE AND DECLARED THEY WERE GOING TO KEEP COUNTING UNTIL THEY GOT THE NUMBERS THEY NEEDED!!!! AMAZING, MY WIFE AND I REALIZED THE ELECTION THEFT AND SWITCHED PARTIES IMMEDIATELY AND HAVE NEVER LOOKED BACK!!! SOUND FAMILIAR?? ELECTION 2020 THE STOLEN ELECTION BY DIMWITOCRAT’S AND I BELIEVE BETWEEN NOW AND THE 2024 ELECTION THE PROOF WILL BE REVEALED THAT 90 CORRUPT JUDGES WOULD NOT LET THE ELECTION BE REVIEWED, STARTING WITH SCOTUS ROBERTS!! AMAZING WHAT SOROS MONEY CAN BUY!!!