Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Election Interference? New York Appeals Court Upholds Gag Order on Trump

The New York Court of Appeals has rejected former President Donald Trump’s appeal to lift the gag order imposed on him by Judge Juan Merchan. This ruling, which many view as politically motivated, continues to restrict Trump from speaking about witnesses and the case, even though his trial has concluded.

Trump’s legal team and supporters argue that the gag order is an unconstitutional violation of his First Amendment rights, particularly as he is the leading Republican candidate for the 2024 presidential election. The gag order, they contend, unjustly silences Trump while allowing his political opponents to speak freely, thus interfering with the electoral process. Since it is an open secret that the trial was politically motivated and orchestrated, it is a legitimate election issue, in fact an important one. This is the first time a presidential administration has used its power to manufacture crimes to convict a political opponent, an act usually reserved for third world and totalitarian governments.

The gag order was initially imposed to prevent Trump from making public statements about witnesses, jurors, prosecutors, court staff, or their families. However, Trump’s attorneys argue that with the trial over, the justifications for such restrictions no longer exist. Todd Blanche, one of Trump’s lawyers, emphasized that the gag order’s continuation is an infringement on Trump’s right to free speech, especially during an active presidential campaign.

Despite these arguments, the New York Court of Appeals upheld the gag order, stating that “no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.” This decision was met with sharp criticism from Trump’s campaign team. Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for the Trump campaign, condemned the ruling, labeling it as an act of election interference.

“The gag order wrongfully silences the leading candidate for President of the United States, President Trump, at the height of his campaign,” Cheung stated. “It applies only to President Trump and not to any of his political opponents, critics, or even President Biden. This Election Interfering Gag Order violates the First Amendment rights of President Trump and all American voters, who have a fundamental right to hear his message.”

The backdrop to this legal battle includes Trump’s conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The trial, which lasted six weeks, was brought forward by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. Throughout the trial, Trump’s legal team repeatedly appealed the gag order, each time being denied.

As Trump’s sentencing date approaches, set for July 11—just days before the Republican National Convention—his legal team continues to fight for the removal of the gag order. They argue that the restrictions are particularly detrimental as Trump prepares for the first presidential debate against President Biden and seeks to communicate his campaign message to the American public.

Former federal prosecutor Brett Tolman, speaking on the matter, highlighted the broader implications of the gag order, suggesting it sets a concerning precedent for the treatment of political candidates and the balance between judicial orders and constitutional rights.

But let’s look at where this pushes the country. In Russia, Putin had a political rival Alexei Navalny arrested and put on trial for corruption, sentenced him to 8 years in prison. Navalny was not inclined to keep silent, so he was re-arrested, spent some time in the Arctic Circle, and is now dead. This is EXACTLY what is happening to Trump right now, fake charges, corrupt, unjust, and solely to help the incumbant keep power.

How long will this farce continue? Will the Democrats go so far as to put Trump in prison on July 11?

Exit mobile version