Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Biden and Trump agree on Ukraine War … unfortunately

&NewLine;<p>If you believe the narrative&comma; you might think that President Biden is on the side of Ukraine and President Trump is on the side of Russia&period;  In fact&comma; Biden and Trump are on the side of a very similar negotiated peace&period;  They are both pursuing the failed Neville Chamberlain policy of containment and appeasement&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>&lpar;The photo atop this commentary is British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain waving the agreement with Adolph Hitler – agreeing to allow the Fuhrer to keep the recently conquered Sudetenland in return for &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;peace in our time&period;”&nbsp&semi; And how well did that work out&quest;&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Neither Biden nor Trump supports a victory for Ukraine and the defeat of Russia – as meaning Putin withdraws from every inch of Ukrainian territory&comma; including the Crimea and the eastern regions&period;  Russia pays reparations and Ukraine joins NATO&period;  That is probably too much to hope for&comma; but that is what justice and victory look like&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Biden has never pursued a policy of victory for Ukraine&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; As is his habit&comma; he talks tough but never follows through &lpar;think Israel&rpar;&period;&nbsp&semi; His too little&sol;too late policy has dragged out the Ukraine conflict – while pursuing a Putin face-saving negotiated peace agreement&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Trump has been more direct in his reluctance to continue to fund the Ukrainians&comma; but his fundamental policy is for both sides to reach a mutually acceptable negotiated agreement&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The only way for a negotiated agreement to be reached is for Ukraine to cede the lands Russian soldiers currently occupy to Russia&period;  That means Putin wins&period; It is short of a total victory for Putin but the Madman of Moscow comes out ahead – with plenty of time to ponder and prepare for his next conquest&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Florida Senator Marco Rubio – reporting on his conversations with Trump – says that the former President wants to put Ukraine in the strongest possible negotiating position before proceeding with actual negotiations&period;&nbsp&semi; That suggests that Trump is not the patsy for Putin as claimed by Democrats and the left-leaning news media – but not on the side of Ukrainian President Zelenskyy either&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>However&comma; making a negotiated compromise the goal instead of a clear victory for Ukraine is still beneficial to Putin – just as is Biden’s too little&sol;too late policy behind which he pushes z as he seeks a negotiated settlement along the same terms as Trump&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Instead of pressuring Zelenskyy into a compromise settlement – in which the nation loses 20 percent of its most strategic real estate and resources – Biden and Trump should be lock solid in expressing America’s repudiation of Putin’s strategy of rebuilding his old Soviet Union&period;  Just the fact that it is known that America’s policy is compromised encourages Putin to carry on&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Yielding to Putin’s aggression in any way further weakens American influence and power in the world – as did the disastrous surrender to the terrorist Taliban in Afghanistan&period;&nbsp&semi; It will be just another example of the United States not being feared by enemies or trusted by Allies&period; That means more assaults on the free world in the future – maybe in Taiwan &&num;8230&semi; or coming after the rest of Ukraine &&num;8230&semi; against American bases in the Middle East &&num;8230&semi; Chinese bases in Cuba&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>What Trump and Biden appear to be proposing is the old &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;containment policy” that resulted in the conflicts in Southeast Asia when President Truman imposed it in the 1940s&period;  Accepting each incremental advance by the Communist nations led to their expansion throughout the world&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>That ended when President Reagan changed course&period;  Rather than contain the authoritarian nations to whatever land they could seize&comma; he and his advisors developed a policy of aggressively pushing back those who were dreaming of world domination&period;  As a result&comma; enemy interests were driven out of areas – culminating in the collapse of the entire Soviet Union and the liberating of what was then called the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;captive nations&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>That is the lesson to be learned&period;  Not the containment and appeasement of Neville Chamberlain&period;  Russia must lose just as Iran must lose – or America and the free world lose&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version