Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Yellen Bowing in Beijing a Setback For America

&NewLine;<p>Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen was dispatched to Beijing by the White House to meet with high-ranking Chinese officials&period;&nbsp&semi; She follows in the footsteps of Secretary of State Antony Blinken&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Like the Blinken mission&comma; there were no advance announcements of any deliverables – agreements&comma; breakthroughs or specific concessions by China&period;&nbsp&semi; The Blinken mission lived up to its progress free billing&period;&nbsp&semi; The United States got nothing from China&period;&nbsp&semi; Nothing on the spy facility in Cuba or &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;police stations” in the United States&period;&nbsp&semi; No secession of provocative military &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;close calls&period;”&nbsp&semi; No accountability on the Covid Pandemic&period;&nbsp&semi; No relinquishment of claims over the China South Sea&period;&nbsp&semi; No termination of unfair trade practices&period;&nbsp&semi; No restoration of direct military communication&period;&nbsp&semi; No help with the Ukraine war&period;&nbsp&semi; No nothing<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>On the other hand&comma; China got a psychological benefit by having Blinken supplicate the United States to a humbling visit&period;&nbsp&semi; President Xi Jinping also got Blinken to oppose independence of Taiwan and to confirm to the world that Taiwan belongs to China under America’s One China policy – a policy widely recognized throughout the world&period;&nbsp&semi; Blinken declared the issue of the Chinese spy balloon to be closed&period;&nbsp&semi; No consequences&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Now cometh Yellen&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The most common media expression as Yellen landed in the Middle Kingdom was &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;low expectations&period;”&nbsp&semi; Since her stated mission was to assure China that the United States does not wish to &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;decouple” the relationship&comma; we can assume that there would be no harsh measures for China’s bad behavior in many sectors&period;&nbsp&semi; There was a stated hope of restoring warmth to the increasingly chilly relationship&period;&nbsp&semi; How that would be achieved – and what evidence we might see – is a mystery&period;&nbsp&semi; It seems more of a baseless hope – a throw-away line – rather than a real achievable goal&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Now that the Yellen trip is history&comma; we can safely say that nothing appears to have been accomplished&period;&nbsp&semi; She had more than 10 hours of discussions with Chinese Premier Li Qiang and Vice premier He Lifeng&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The most significant announcement was Yellen’s commitment to the Chinese&sol;American trade relationship&period;&nbsp&semi; She said that the United States has no intention of &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;decoupling” from the current status quo&period;&nbsp&semi; She said that decoupling would have devastating impact on both China and the United States&comma; as well as the world economy – and be &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;virtually impossible&period;”&nbsp&semi; Sounds like that means no significant consequences for the various actions by China to which the United States takes exception&period;&nbsp&semi; Nothing beyond toothless verbal complaints&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>That conflicts with one of the other issues Yellen said she brought up&period;&nbsp&semi; We would take &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;targeted actions” to protect the national security interests of the United States &&num;8212&semi; but we would be considerate of China’s concerns about any unintended consequences of our actions”&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>She told the Chinese that America was &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;very concerned” about China’s treatment of American companies’ intellectual property and access to the Chinese market&period;&nbsp&semi; Those are the same issues which &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;concerned” the United States when I started going to China on business in 1999&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Yellen said she urged China to increase its funding of climate change issues&period;&nbsp&semi; No commitment from China on that one&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Yellen left China saying that the world was big enough for both nations to thrive – and she does not view the China&sol;US relationship as a great power struggle&period;&nbsp&semi; That might be a good thing&comma; but only if the other side sees it the same way – which China clearly does not&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Yellen conceded that there was no consensus on any of the key issues&period;&nbsp&semi; But she HOPED that her visit would help build a beneficial channel of communication between both sides&period;&nbsp&semi; Unfortunately&comma; that channel of communication is a one-way deal&period;&nbsp&semi; We express concerns and hope&comma; and the Chinese ignore our concerns and dash our hopes&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>We have a range of issues with China – trade practices&comma; intellectual property&comma; commercial espionage&comma; increased spying&comma; support for Putin’s invasion of Ukraine&comma; territorial claims to the South China Sea and the Straits of Taiwan&comma; the construction of military islands in the South China Sea and a potential invasion of Taiwan&comma; to name a few&period;&nbsp&semi; The Yellen and Blinken visits did not gain a single consideration – much less a concession – from China&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>NATO is not as hesitant to call out China&period;&nbsp&semi; In a communique produced at the NATO summit in Lithuania&comma; the Alliance said that China’s &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;stated ambitions and coercive policies challenge our &lpar;NATO’s&rpar; interests&comma; security and values&period;”&nbsp&semi; They accused China of employing &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;a broad range of political&comma; economic&comma; and military tools to increase its global footprint and project power&comma; while remaining opaque about its strategy&comma; intentions and military build-up&comma;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The world was watching and unfortunately&comma; the Yellen and the Blinken trips signal weakness on the part of the United States – as did President Biden’s humbling trip to Saudi Arabia to beg for oil&period;&nbsp&semi; It was the first bump seen around the world&period;&nbsp&semi; All three missions were failures&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Yellen also committed a diplomatic boo-boo&period;&nbsp&semi; She has a habit of bobblehead bowing in discussions with Chinese leaders&period;&nbsp&semi; While the western culture may see it as a nothing burger&comma; Asian cultures give great meaning to the kowtow&period;&nbsp&semi; It is a sign of supplication and weakness&period;&nbsp&semi; She did it upon her arrival&comma; but it was most significant when dealing with high level Chinese officials – who did not bend or bow in return&period;&nbsp&semi; Those optics were very bad for the United States&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Like Blinken’s trip&comma; the Yellen junket was said to be setting the stage for the anticipated meeting in Beijing between President Biden and President Xi&period;&nbsp&semi; We can only hope that apart from all that empty rhetoric coming out of the Blinken and Yellen meetings&comma; there was some private discussion that will lead to a more productive visit by Biden&period;&nbsp&semi; Or will he follow suit and express our concerns without any concession on the part of China&quest;&nbsp&semi; Stay tuned&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version