Calls for Zelenskyy’s Resignation: Who Is Pushing the Narrative?
Lindsey Graham has been the most vocal American politician calling for Zelenskyy to step aside, but he is not alone. Certain members of the Trump administration and other Republican figures have hinted at the need for a leadership change in Ukraine, arguing that Zelenskyy’s combative approach is complicating U.S. efforts to sustain support for the war.
However, Ukrainian officials and international leaders have pushed back strongly against these suggestions. Ukrainian MP Kira Rudik directly responded to Graham’s remarks, saying, “With all due respect, Ukrainians elect their own leaders, and we are known to start revolutions when our leaders don’t act in our best interests. It is not up to a Russian president, an American president, or U.S. officials to dictate who should lead Ukraine.”
Zelenskyy’s Stance: No Plans to Resign
Despite mounting pressure, Zelenskyy has made it clear he has no intention of resigning—unless Ukraine is granted NATO membership. During his Fox News interview, he reiterated, “No. This decision belongs to the Ukrainian people alone.”
He also highlighted the crucial role of continued U.S. support, acknowledging that Ukraine’s war effort would be far more difficult without American aid. However, he maintained that Ukraine should not be forced into political compromises in exchange for assistance. “If the U.S. supports NATO [accession] for Ukraine, that would be enough. I have done everything I needed to do. If someone is unhappy with me, that’s fine—but I will not step down.”
If Zelenskyy Were to Step Down, Who Could Lead Ukraine?
Should Zelenskyy leave office, several high-profile figures could emerge as potential successors:
- Vitali Klitschko: The mayor of Kyiv and former world boxing champion has been a prominent advocate for Ukraine on the global stage. Although he has previously clashed with Zelenskyy, Klitschko recently warned that holding elections during wartime could “tear the country apart from within.” His strong backing in the capital and international recognition make him a serious contender.
- Ruslan Stefanchuk: As the chairman of Ukraine’s parliament and a close ally of Zelenskyy, Stefanchuk has staunchly opposed the idea of elections amid the ongoing conflict. He has argued that Ukraine needs “weapons, not ballots” at this critical moment.
- Kyrylo Budanov: The head of Ukraine’s military intelligence agency is among the most trusted figures in Ukraine, even surpassing Zelenskyy in popularity. While he has not publicly indicated any political ambitions, his leadership could bring stability during a crisis.
- General Valery Zaluzhny: The former Commander-in-Chief of Ukraine’s armed forces and current ambassador to the U.K. remains highly respected. Despite being dismissed from his military post in 2024 due to disagreements with Zelenskyy, he continues to enjoy strong public support, with approval ratings around 80%.
The Future of Ukraine’s Leadership
The uncertainty surrounding Zelenskyy’s presidency comes at a crucial time for Ukraine, as the country remains locked in a grueling war with Russia while heavily reliant on Western aid. A leadership transition could disrupt coordination with allies, weaken Ukraine’s position in negotiations, and create internal instability at a moment when national unity is vital.
A shift in leadership could also alter Ukraine’s approach to peace talks. A more conciliatory leader might push for a settlement, potentially at the cost of Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Conversely, a hardline successor could face challenges in securing continued international support—especially if tensions with Washington escalate under Trump’s influence.
For now, Zelenskyy remains adamant about staying in office, asserting that his fate lies in the hands of the Ukrainian people. However, with political pressure mounting both domestically and abroad, the question remains: can he hold onto power, or will external and internal forces eventually force him to step aside?
NP Editor’s Note:
A mineral rights deal would have been the best possible outcome for Ukraine, as it would have ensured a vested U.S. interest in the country’s future. Zelenskyy, however, appears to believe he can reclaim all of Ukraine’s lost territories—an unrealistic expectation given that no country is willing to deploy troops to expel Russian forces and risk nuclear war.
Ukraine has been offered security, but Trump is correct—Europe must take on more responsibility for the conflict.