<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="center">Ever since the U.S. pulled out of the Paris accord, environmentalists and Democrats have been outraged claiming that the planet earth is now doomed.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The truth is that there isn&rsquo;t enough evidence proving that Climate Change is real. Not to mention, changing the earth&rsquo;s climate may not even be humanly possible according to experts.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&ldquo;For human beings to change the climate of the planet is a monstrously enormous undertaking&hellip;I haven&rsquo;t seen convincing evidence of it,&rdquo; said David Gelernter, Computer Science professor at Yale and Climate Change denier.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nonetheless, the science often used to defend Climate Change has been proven to be applied incorrectly.  ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dr. David Evans, a rocket scientist and former consultant to the Government&rsquo;s Australian Greenhouse Office, has discovered that the underlying physics of the basic climate model has been used incorrectly and that the climate isn&rsquo;t impacted by CO2 nearly as much as Climate Change supporters think.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&ldquo;He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate&rsquo;s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought,&rdquo; writes Australia&rsquo;s <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">News.com.au.</em> &ldquo;It turns out the UN&rsquo;s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.&rdquo; ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&ldquo;Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it&rsquo;s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades,&rdquo; said Dr. Evans.  ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">He also points out that current climate change model fails to explain why &ldquo;global warming has paused for 18+ years. ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&ldquo;The model architecture was wrong,&rdquo; said Dr. Evans. &ldquo;Carbon dioxide causes only minor warming. The climate is largely driven by factors outside our control.&rdquo; ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">He outlines another major discrepancy. Since the 1990s, climate scientists claim that according to the original climate model, temperature changes should match the CO2 changes. This has not been the case.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Evans&rsquo; research shows that solar activity, or what he calls &ldquo;albedo modulation,&rdquo; the impact of the reflected radiation from the sun is attributing to global warming. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> ;</span> ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">According to his findings, Evans believes that global temperatures will cool from 2017 to 2021.  ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&ldquo;It took me years to figure this out, but finally there is a potential resolution between the insistence of the climate scientists that CO2 is a big problem ;and the empirical evidence that it doesn&rsquo;t have nearly as much effect as they say,&rdquo; said Evans.  ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&ldquo;According to a ;2004 study by R.J. Klee and T.E. Graedel, carbon emissions are just one example among many cases where human activity has mobilized geological materials at rates far exceeding natural processes. ; Our species has become uniquely powerful in its environmental potency. Those who deny an anthropogenic cause of global warming have been called &ldquo;climate skeptics,&rdquo; a euphemistic term that would appear to give them an elevated ethical standing in critical thought. ;Based on our consideration of well-documented scientific research, and like the vast majority of Earth scientists &mdash; as documented in a ;2016 study in the journal Environmental Research Letters ; ;&mdash; we reject the hypothesis that human carbon emissions have had zero effect on global climate,&rdquo; wrote Evans for <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Yale News.</em>  ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Evans&rsquo; scientific theory has been around for years, yet it hasn&rsquo;t gotten much attention from the media. Why is that?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It&rsquo;s likely because the liberal media continues its bias reporting and the public opinion regarding Climate Change won&rsquo;t be easy to alter.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Most of our school systems teach the popular Climate Change theory to our students.  ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Earlier this year, the Heartland Institute, a libertarian nonprofit organization sent out a report titled, &ldquo;Why Scientist Disagree About Global Warming.&rdquo; This mailer offered alternative scientific teachings to climate change, but teachers and legislators aggressively rejected the material. ;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#8220;I am writing to ask you to consider the possibility that the science, in fact, is not &#8216;settled,'&#8221; wrote Lennie Jarratt, manager for the institute&#8217;s Center for Transforming Education at Heartland Institute in a cover letter. &#8220;If that&#8217;s the case, then students would be better served by letting them know a vibrant debate is taking place among scientists on how big the human impact on climate is, and whether or not we should be worried about it.&#8221;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Author&rsquo;s note: </strong>Liberal media outlets and education systems have done a great job brainwashing young Americans that climate change is not only real ;but also will lead to the earth&rsquo; demise. Dr. Evans research debunks one of the most popular climate change arguments, but his research is getting unfairly ignored.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Editor&#8217;s note: A claim this big by a researcher with these qualifications should at the very least be analyzed and peer reviewed. But as yet, it is not being covered, and we have seen no acknowledgment by the &#8216;climate change establishment.&#8217; This is fundamentally dishonest. But not surprising.</p>
<p> ;</p>