Site icon The Punching Bag Post

White House to Block Chinese Investment, Tech Exports

<p>The Trump Administration this week announced plans to use a 1977 emergency law to block Chinese investment in US tech and to limit tech exports to China&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>More specifically&comma; the proposal blocks companies with at least one-quarter Chinese ownership from purchasing US firms&nbsp&semi;involved in &ldquo&semi;industrially significant technology&rdquo&semi; and seeks to limit&nbsp&semi;the export of certain technologies to China&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The two-pronged approach is specifically designed to stop China from accomplishing its &ldquo&semi;Made in China 2025&rdquo&semi; initiative to become globally dominant in 10 areas of technology by the year 2025&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;The President has made clear his desire to protect American technology&comma;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;says Commerce Sec&period; Wilbur Ross&period; &ldquo&semi;All possibilities that would better protect American technology&comma; including potential changes to export controls&comma; are under review&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>While the block on Chinese investment isn&rsquo&semi;t expected to have a huge effect on American businesses&comma; some industries worry the new export controls could harm their businesses by preventing them from taking advantage of their technological edge&period; Others worry that declaring a national economic emergency will have a negative effect on the stock market and on US companies operating in China&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The proposal&comma; which is still subject to change&comma; would apply only to new deals and would not seek to undo existing ones&period; The Administration also said US industries would have the opportunity to comment on the proposal before it takes effect&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;There is opportunity for the administration to arrive at a formula for policy that addresses national-security risks in a targeted way and not put a blanket on activities that our companies are involved in every single day&comma;&rdquo&semi; says Josh Kallmer of the Information Technology Industry Council&comma; adding that he expects several companies to comment on the proposal&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&mdash&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The twin measures against China are among a series of economic actions Trump has justified by claiming a national security threat&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The steel and aluminum tariffs were imposed under the <em>Trade Expansion Act of 1962&period;<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>â€&DoubleDot;The new restrictions on China will be enacted under the <em>International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977<&sol;em> &&num;8211&semi; an emergency law which gives the president certain powers in the case of an &ldquo&semi;unusual and extraordinary threat&rdquo&semi; &&num;8211&semi; that threat in this case being China&rsquo&semi;s spying and theft of&nbsp&semi;intellectual property&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Opponents have criticized Trump for using the security threat rationale to accomplish his trade objectives&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;The administration is saying&comma; &lsquo&semi;if we declare everything a national security issue we can do whatever we want&comma;&rsquo&semi;&rdquo&semi; argues China expert Derek Scissors&period; &ldquo&semi;It&rsquo&semi;s a misuse of executive power&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The new restrictions on China follow threats by Trump to impose tariffs on up to &dollar;450 billion of Chinese goods&period;&nbsp&semi;A 25&percnt; tariff on &dollar;34 billion of Chinese imports&nbsp&semi;is scheduled to go into effect on July 6th&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><em>Thanks to increased federal scrutiny of foreign deals&comma; Chinese investment in the US has already dropped more than 90&percnt; compared to this time last year&period; And Congress is also considering a separate proposal that would further increase the scrutiny of foreign business deals to determine the risk that&nbsp&semi;&ldquo&semi;critical technology&rdquo&semi; will be transferred to other countries&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>Editor&&num;8217&semi;s note&colon;<&sol;strong> This IS a threat and Trump is negotiating fiercely&period; No other president seems to have ever had the guts to go toe to toe with not only China&comma; but Europe and our other trading partners who have been taking advantage of our good will&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version