Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Which past Presidents would be better today?

&NewLine;<p>Time for another political parlor game&period;&nbsp&semi; The other day&comma; I was asked who I would pick from past Presidents to lead the nation today&period;&nbsp&semi; While I think they would be obvious choices&comma; I did not pick any of the Founders or President Lincoln – no one from the pre-industrial age&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>I also put my own spin on the mental exercise&period;&nbsp&semi; If you could pick a candidate for President today from each party – but from only from&nbsp&semi; the post-1900 list of past Presidents &&num;8212&semi; who would those candidates be&quest;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>On the Republican side&comma; my pick would be obvious to anyone reading my commentaries&period;&nbsp&semi; I pick President Reagan&period;&nbsp&semi; Some might be surprised by my pick for the Democrat candidate&period; I go with Bill Clinton&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Just for the record&comma; my second choice on the GOP side would be President Eisenhower – and President Truman for the Democrats&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><strong>So&comma; why Reagan&quest;<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Of course&comma; I like his conservative policies&period;&nbsp&semi; I would credit him with one of – if not THE – most successful American foreign policies &&num;8212&semi; at least since Jefferson&period;&nbsp&semi; Obviously&comma; Reagan’s most notable achievement was an 8-year policy directed at dissembling the old Soviet Union – freeing dozens of the so-called &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;captive nations&period;”&nbsp&semi; He shattered Stalin’s empire&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Reagan spoke softly but carried that big stick to which Teddy Roosevelt referred – and was not afraid to use it surgically&period;&nbsp&semi; He ended Muammar al-Gaddafi’s support of international terrorism by bombing the presidential palace in Libya – and pushed back on Gaddafi’s claim over Mediterranean waters by shooting down Libyan fighter jets operating belligerently against American ships operating in international waters&period;&nbsp&semi; He sent troops into Greneda to prevent a Communist takeover&period;&nbsp&semi; He toppled the Sandinistas in Nicaragua&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>On the home front&comma; Reaganomics ended one of the worst inflationary periods in American history&period;&nbsp&semi; Reagan was mostly successful in dealing with the major issues that plague America today&period;&nbsp&semi; He was tough on crime&period;&nbsp&semi; He understood the importance of border security&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>He also had a healthy concern over the undermining of American federalism – specifically the usurpation of powers belonging to the states and the people by an increasing powerful regulatory government in Washington&period;&nbsp&semi; He summed it up when he said&comma; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Government is not part of the problem&comma; it IS the problem&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>However&comma; I think his greatest contribution may have been his personality and his demeanor&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; As the saying goes&comma; Reagan could disagree strongly without being disagreeable&period;&nbsp&semi; Like Lincoln&comma; he respected his political adversaries and recognized the need for civil discourse&period;&nbsp&semi; And like Lincoln&comma; Reagan often devastated his adversaries with humor&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Reagan made patriotism respectable&period;&nbsp&semi; He led the American people to the better angels of their nature&period; That was because Reagan never saw himself as the issue&period;&nbsp&semi; He constantly referred to goodness of the American people&period;&nbsp&semi; He was only there to represent that&period;&nbsp&semi; He never took criticism personally or attacked others personally&period;&nbsp&semi; Reagan’s warm working relationship with Democrat House Speaker Tip O’Neill was a hallmark of his personality&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Everything that Reagan was seems to be missing in Washington today&period;&nbsp&semi; There is a reason why the American people gave Reagan one of the biggest reelection victories in American history&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><strong>Now&comma; what about Clinton&quest;<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Looking at American Presidents over the past 100 years&comma; I have to eliminate President Wilson and President Franklin Roosevelt for the big central government agenda as well as their white supremacist beliefs and policies&period; Same with President Johnson – although recognizing his late-in-life enlightened racial policies&period;&nbsp&semi; President Carter was just too weak – and never seemed up to the task&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>I am not as negative on President Obama as many of my conservative colleagues are&period;&nbsp&semi; He was still too much of a big Washington government type&period;&nbsp&semi; While Obamacare has become more popular&comma; I am not sure it will serve the nation well as it goes along&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>But I did not select Clinton merely on the comparison of the others&period;&nbsp&semi; I have long believed and written that Clinton was a better President than many of my colleagues will concede&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Clinton foreign policies were the establishment of the World Trade Organization&period;&nbsp&semi; He forced Russia to withdraw troops from Latvia and Estonia&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; He brokered the Oslo Accords that created peace between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization which provided limited self-rule in exchange for the PLO agreeing to Israel’s right to exist&period;&nbsp&semi; He led the diplomatic effort that resulted in the Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland&period;&nbsp&semi; He supported the inclusion of Poland&comma; Hungry and the Czech Republic into NATO&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>On the domestic front Clinton – with the cooperation of a Republican Congress – produced a rare balanced budget at a time Congress was still living up to his budgeting responsibilities&period; He was tough on crime and produced a number of anti-crime bills – including an assault rifle ban&period;&nbsp&semi; The key man in Congress for that legislation was then Senate Judiciary Chairman Joe Biden&period;&nbsp&semi; Ironically&comma; Biden is now trying to ignore those actions&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Clinton reformed welfare to create a work component and to reduce abuse of the welfare programs&period; He did not undo the Reagan economic program&comma; but basically continued it – which meant that Clinton was conservative on fiscal restraint&period;&nbsp&semi; Clinton even declared that &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;the day of big government is over&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>As far as Clinton’s serial scandals&comma; I can only say that I am more interested in WHAT a President does than WHO he does&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><strong>Summary<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>If in 2024&comma; we were looking at an election between Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton&comma; I think every American could take comfort that the nation would be in relatively good hands – one way or the other&period;&nbsp&semi; Yes …there are differences to be considered and debated&period;&nbsp&semi; And of course&comma; in my imaginary contest Reagan gets my vote&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version