Site icon The Punching Bag Post

What was Speaker Johnson thinking?

&NewLine;<p>House Speaker Johnson came to power when the right wing of the Republican House caucus rose up against then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy and the business-as-usual legislative process&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Johnson was a member of the Freedom Caucus and often described as a MAGA Republican&period;  So&comma; how is it possible that he played business as usual by agreeing to a god-awful funding bill that simply kicked the can down the road and agreed to a bill filled with billions of dollars of perks&comma; pork and pet spending projects&quest;  That also includes funding for those automatic Congressional pay raises&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>As is often the case&comma; the original 1500 page Bill – based on an agreement between Johnson and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies – was revealed just prior to the voting deadline – providing zero time to read and analyze it&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; But enough could be garnered on quick perusal to know that it was another congressional stink bomb&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Johnson should have known that there were more than a few in his GOP caucus who would go bonkers&period;&nbsp&semi; And just a handful is enough to prevent the Speaker from getting the vote count he needed&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Most speakers do not bring a bill up for consideration until they know they have the votes&period;&nbsp&semi; Johnson brought up the Bill knowing he did not have the votes&period;&nbsp&semi; At least he should have known&period;&nbsp&semi; Hell&comma; he did not even have the backing of President Trump&comma; who came out against the bill&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The left-wing press is running with a narrative that it was Elon Musk who doomed the Bill when he posted his opposition on X&period;&nbsp&semi; That might fit with the left’s narrative attacking Musk as a conflicted billionaire acting as <em>a de facto<&sol;em> President&comma; but it is just political bs&period;&nbsp&semi; That initial bill was dead on arrival no matter what Musk said or&nbsp&semi; did not say&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The Republican revolt against the Bill was already underway when Musk issued his comments on X&period;&nbsp&semi; Anyone who knows anything about Congress would understand that Musk’s opinion is unlikely to have changed a single vote on the Bill&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Trump can have influence over votes – not Musk&period;&nbsp&semi; Had Trump strongly supported the bill&comma; it might have had a chance&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; But the&nbsp&semi; bill was so bad that he had to oppose his own Speaker&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The there was a second bill proposed by Johnson&period;&nbsp&semi; It too failed&period;&nbsp&semi; Finally&comma; there was a bipartisan compromise bill that passed and a government shutdown was put off for another day&period;&nbsp&semi; It passed over the opposition of &lowbar;&lowbar; Republican House members&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Trump wanted Congress to abolish the meaningless debt ceiling&period; Insofar as the&nbsp&semi; final bill did not&nbsp&semi; provide for that&comma; Trump came out on the short end of&nbsp&semi; the deal&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>And now Johnson’s fate is being debated&period;  Can he survive as Speaker&quest;   It only takes one member to move to vacate the chair – and the vote is on&period;  It seems more likely than not that in an actual vote&comma; Johnson would not get the full support of his members&period;  A couple of defections&comma; and he is out&period;  That could lead to another prolonged multi-vote disaster&period;  Even worse because this one comes at the beginning of the new Congress&period;  If Republicans cannot agree at the onset&comma; the business of the House ceases&period;  Not only no legislation&comma; but no committee appointments and most significantly &&num;8230&semi; no certification of the incoming President&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>It looks like chaos ahead – but it may be a blessing in disguise&period;  Perhaps &&num;8230&semi; just perhaps &&num;8230&semi; this will be the last time that all the nonsense about earmarks&comma; excessive spending&comma; continuing resolutions and legislative hanky-panky will end&period;  President  Trump and House  Republicans have an opportunity to return the Congress to the normal order constitutionally required budgeting process – which has not taken place for approximately  30 years&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>One should not overlook the malevolent role that is being played by the House Democrats&period;&nbsp&semi; They are united in their refusal to support any bill that does not continue their tax and spend policies – and all the expenditures for their special interest groups&period;&nbsp&semi; That is the money used to buy votes&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz was on the telly talking about the now-dead compromise bill&period;&nbsp&semi; She talked about the funding for hurricane victims and brush fire victims&period;&nbsp&semi; Of course&comma; that is a very small portion of the &dollar;1&period;7 trillion dollar short-term funding Bill&period; &nbsp&semi;She did not point to all the special interest political payoffs&period;&nbsp&semi; It is a pork barrel bill with more fat than pork&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Democrats are complaining that Trump is acting as if he were already President – and even that Musk is a shadow President&period;&nbsp&semi; The only person that no one is accusing of acting like a president is &&num;8230&semi; President Biden&period;&nbsp&semi; Both he and Vice President Harris were MIA during the government funding debate&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Hopefully with the new administration and new resolve&comma; we will at last stop kicking the problem of excessive and wasteful spending down the road and actually bring fiscal responsibility and economic sanity to Washington&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version