Site icon The Punching Bag Post

What the Hell Was Vance Doing in Hungary?

&NewLine;<p>One has to ask why Vice President Vance travelled to Hungary to openly endorse the reelection campaign of President Viktor Orban&period; The entire episode reeks of poor judgment&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>It is not as if the United States makes a habit of dispatching high-ranking officials to insert themselves into the electoral processes of other sovereign nations&period; <em>Au contraire<&sol;em>&period; After all&comma; we Americans become positively apoplectic when we suspect foreign interference in our own elections&period; One would assume that the people of Hungary feel much the same way about American politicians showing up on their soil to influence the outcome of their vote&period; Yet there was Vance&comma; grinning for the cameras alongside Orban as if he were stumping for a local school board candidate back home&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Orban&comma; by all accounts&comma; finds himself in political trouble&period; His grip on power appears to be slipping&comma; and his invitation to Vance represents nothing more than a desperate Hail Mary pass&period; One can almost picture the Hungarian leader thinking that a boost from the American Vice President might rally his base or intimidate his opponents&period; What a brilliant calculation that turned out to be&period; Reports from Budapest indicate that Orban fared even worse in the polls after Vance’s visit&period; Instead of a surge in support&comma; the endorsement seems to have backfired spectacularly&comma; handing ammunition to Orban’s critics who now paint him as beholden to foreign interests&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>What makes the trip even more perplexing is that it delivered zero discernible benefits to the United States&comma; to Vance or to the Trump administration&period; Not one strategic advantage appears to have been gained&period; No trade deal was advanced&period; No security agreement was strengthened&period; No support for the fight in Iran&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>No vital national interest was advanced by cozying up to Orban at this particular moment&period; Instead&comma; the visit has invited a predictable torrent of criticism from Trump’s political adversaries&comma; who waste no time labeling the administration as soft on authoritarians&period; Even some of the president’s usual supporters scratch their heads in bewilderment&comma; wondering aloud what possible good could come from sending Vance to Hungary&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Of course&comma; none of this should shock those who have followed President Trump’s strange and enduring bromance with Orban&period; Trump has long praised the Hungarian strongman for his &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Hungary for Hungarians” policies&period; One supposes that such rhetoric appeals to certain isolationist instincts&period; However&comma; this friendship takes on a far more disturbing hue when viewed through the lens of Orban’s uncomfortably close relationship with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin&period; While the United States and its allies pour resources into countering Russian aggression&comma; Orban has maintained warm ties with the Kremlin&period; That fact alone should give any clear-thinking American pause before offering public endorsements on Hungarian soil&period; In fact&comma; criticism seems more appropriate&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>In the end&comma; Vance’s jaunt to Budapest comes across as amateurish foreign policy at best and dangerously tone-deaf meddling at worst&period; It undermines the long-standing American principle of allowing other world democracies to conduct their own affairs without overt interference from Washington&period; It provides political opponents with fresh material to paint the administration as erratic and unprincipled&period; And it accomplishes nothing of value for the American people who expect their leaders to focus on domestic priorities and America’s own foreign affairs interests &&num;8212&semi; rather than playing campaign surrogate for a controversial likely to be ousted European leader with questionable alliances&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version