New revelations from unsealed documents have reportedly confirmed that the Biden administration’s legal attacks on President Trump are part of a coordinated political plan – or lawfare, as many conservative publications put it.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted President Trump last year for allegedly mishandling classified documents while Joe Biden got a free pass by the DOJ for doing the same in his capacity as a Vice President. Last week, The Federalist highlighted the “3 Most Shocking Discoveries” surfacing from a set of documents unsealed by Judge Aileen Cannon in the case of alleged mishandling of classified documents by President Trump.
Citing the postings of independent reporter Julie Kelly who went through the details of the unsealed records, the story wrote that Jack Smith’s lead prosecutor Jay Bratt threatened Stanley Woodward – attorney to Trump staffer Walt Nauta – with sabotaging his judicial nomination. Bratt was attempting to pressure Woodward into getting Nauta to turn on Trump as revealed in the unsealed motion from June 2023.
The second revelation, perhaps the most revealing of a political plot against Trump, relates the collaboration between the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and Biden’s White House soon after Trump left the White House. In May 2021, NARA General Counsel Gary Stern sent a letter to Presidential Records Act (PRA) representatives in which he admitted to having “several conversations” with the White House’s Office of Records Management. Following these conversations, Trump’s PRA representatives were threatened NARA Archivist David Ferriero as well as approached by Deputy White House Counsel Jonathan Su, who wanted them to let an “an undisclosed individual” access certain notes from the Trump administration.
Another damning revelation emerging from the unsealed records shows that Biden’s Department of Energy (DOE) retroactively revoked President Trump’s security clearance after Jack Smith indicted him. Conservative organization Judicial Watch is reportedly demanding the DOE via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for records of their security clearance termination of President Trump.
These revelations from the unsealed documents further strengthen the conviction of conservatives that the DOJ indictment of President Trump is nothing more than a coordinated scheme of stopping Trump from running for and/or winning the presidency in November 2024. Part of this scheme is Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s legal case against Trump, the much-hyped hush-money trial. But the anti-Trump forces are struggling to have a real case there as well. The recent testimony of David Pecker, publisher of the National Enquirer, in the trial has widely been cited by conservatives as the end of Bragg’s case.
Citizen journalist Charles Downs wrote on Twitter/X that David Pecker’s testimony has totally destroyed Alvin Bragg’s case against President Trump but the Trump-hating Judge Merchan would continue to drag this case unless this election interference by the Democrats is stopped by the Supreme Court.
On Sunday (April 28), Newsmax noted that Judge Juan Merchan has not only been a donor to Democrats but his daughter makes a living off funding for Democrats who have publicly expressed hatred for Trump. The story added:
District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s trial is actually one seeking to find a crime.