Select Page

U.N. Encouraging Islamic Invasion

U.N. Encouraging Islamic Invasion

The word invasion can be defined as “the incoming or spread of something usually hurtful” (Merriam-Webster). 

Yesterday, at the first ever UN meeting focused on Addressing Large Movements of Refugees and Migrants, leaders proposed forcing member states to absorb 10% of the world’s refugee population. According to estimates, the current population of displaced individuals is over 65 million, 21.3 million of which are refugees. 

Members were quick to strike down this dangerous proposal, and the summit’s final declaration is a vague document without concrete commitments. 

The New York Declaration on Migrants and Refugees is not legally binding, but it does seek to standardize responses to crisis situations, improve working opportunities for refugees, and fight xenophobia. 

“The overall climate is not very favorable to receiving refugees in many parts of the world but on the one hand, states committed to this so we can remind them of their obligations,” says UN High Commissioner Fillipo Grandi. 

More “progress” is expected at a secondary summit Tuesday called by President Obama, where at least 45 of the UN’s 193 member nations will make pledges in line with Obama’s goals to:

• Increase humanitarian aid by $3 billion

• Double resettlement

• Increase access to education and employment for refugees  

This is how Islam spreads. As we can clearly see from what is happening today in Germany and other nations that have opened their doors to hundreds of thousands of refugees, Islam does not mesh with Western law and culture. 

In this case, “resettlement” is more akin to invasion. 

My point is exemplified by London Mayor Shadiq Khan’s recent statement that immigrants should not have to assimilate. “People shouldn’t have to drop their cultures and traditions when they arrive in our cities and countries,” he said while speaking to a crowd in the US.

Kahn is right in that immigrants should not have to drop their traditions when living in a foreign country, but the trouble here is that Sharia Law, a moral code supported by many Muslims, directly contradicts Western culture. 

As we wrote on Tuesday, a recent poll shows that nearly 30% of the 3-4 million Muslims living in France consider Sharia Law to be more important than French law; 60% believe that women should cover their heads at schools and universities, a practice that is strictly prohibited at secular schools. 

With thinking like this it is literally impossible for Islam to coexist peacefully with Western culture. And yet, world leaders are hard at working trying to force assimilation. 

“You hear all around the world the UN hasn’t handled the refugee crisis. The way the UN will handle the refugee crisis is if all of us countries within the UN step up and dig deep and face those political headwinds that we all face, to do more, to give more, to take on a greater share of the resettlement challenge,” says US ambassador Samantha Power.

Editor’s Note: Malthus described the third worlds aptly, “population expands to consume all available resources, check by war, famine and disease.”  This describes the Musltim world, fighting over resources, making war among themselves as well as the outside world.  

Muslim refugees invading Europe, the U.S. and other parts of the world (remember they largely refuse to assimilate) are merely an extension of Malthus’ description. Any aid to the refugees that allows them to live permanently in other countries, merely assures more wars and more refugees. This is another basic truth, “Whatever you subsidize, you get more of.”

About The Author


  1. Philip Simon

    This what happens when we let people in to the country and we know nothing about what their backgrounds are.

  2. Philip Simon

    I pledge allegiance to the flag, not ISIS or Allah and Mohammad, the G-d of our religion and our nation Judaism and Christianity(the Second Judaism).

  1. Horist: makes you wonder what Reagan did so poorly that moved him behind a couple of racists. Twas 154 scholars…

  2. Joseph S Bruder..... LMAO. Your list has the two most racist presidents of the 20th Century ahead of Reagan. FDR…