Uber to Start Banning Problem Customers
Uber announced a series of changes to its app on Wednesday, including a feature that will block customers with low ratings from obtaining rides.
At the end of each ride, the Uber app prompts the rider and driver to rate each other on a scale of 1-5 stars. Starting September 19th, riders with a rating lower than 4 will be banned from the app for 6 months.
Riders will receive a warning message and a chance to increase their rating before they are blocked.
“Ideally, we don’t want people to lose access, we just want an environment of mutual respect,” says Australia-based Uber executive Susan Anderson.
The average Uber customer in Australia has a rating of 4.5 or higher.
“To get to a number as low as 4 there really needs to have been multiple instances of 1-star ratings, and complaints from a number of different drivers,” says Anderson. The policy will impact only a “small percentage of riders who are persistently not treating drivers with respect.”
Common complaints from drivers that might affect your rating include:
- Requesting to be picked up in a no-stopping zone
- Starting inappropriate conversations
- Leaving trash in the car
- Slamming the door
- Being a back seat driver
- Requesting unplanned stops
Other changes to the app include 2-factor login, real-time insurance information, and erasing riders’ pickup and drop-off addresses. The changes, which will affect customers in Australia and New Zealand, are designed to improve safety and efficiency.
The company has also reminded users about its no sex rule, which states it is inappropriate for riders to comment on a driver’s appearance, ask them about their relationship status, or arrange a personal visit after the ride has been completed.
Author’s Note: Uber’s new policy has been compared to China’s “social credit system,” where individuals are banned from public transportation for misdeeds.
While Uber’s policy is nothing like China’s, it could cause serious problems if the system is hacked. It’s one thing for a company to keep track of its own employees and store feedback from customers, but it’s another thing entirely to do this to your customers.
Editor’s Note: Even with the Supreme Court ruling that a certain baker doesn’t have to make certain kinds of cakes, this makes me very uncomfortable from both rights and privacy perspectives.

You are right: when you said, and I quote: “it almost appears that dunger (sic) is giving Democrats all the…
Idiot, Re-read my statement. I did not say you WERE giving orders. Stupid ass. You do this stunt on purpose!
Hamondung: what are you even talking about? Drunk talk? The truth hurts Danger; what a silly thing to say. Full…
The truth hurts Dunger. The democrats are full of lies and hate
It’s called return volley since I only respond, never initiate. Do you ever have a serious discussion?