Trump Up for Declassifying Kennedy Assassination Files
What is one thing that scares the deep state out of its sleep? Revealing the truth hidden from the public eye by the intelligence community that could likely expose their role in high-profile assassinations and other crimes against the people of America. Donald Trump fought a fierce legal battle over the issue of classified documents for more than two years. Now that he has retaken the White House, he has acted quickly upon his promise to declassify some of America’s most guarded information.
A day before he was sworn in as the 47th President of the United States, Trump held a victory rally at the Capital One Arena in D.C. In his speech, he told the nation that his administration would reverse the over-classification of government documents in order to restore government’s transparency and accountability. He went on to specify:
“And in the coming days, we are going to make public remaining records relating to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, his brother Robert Kennedy, as well as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.”
Trump’s announcement about declassifying these documents received thunderous applause from the audience and made big news in media as well as created a sensation on social media. Conservatives all around are thrilled with it. On Wednesday (January 22), Sean Hannity of Fox News interviewed President Trump. During the interview, Hannity asked Trump about his commitment to declassifying the assassination files of the Kennedy brothers and MLK Jr.
Trump told Hannity that he had moved to declassify the JFK files during his first term as the President but some of his government officials asked him not to proceed with it. He specifically named Mike Pompeo, who was first his CIA Director and later his Secretary of State, as one of those officials advising him against declassification of the JFK files because he thought it wasn’t the right time.
Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) Jr., nephew of JFK and son of RFK, has gone on record multiple times to accuse the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of assassinating his uncle. In May 2023, RFK Jr. was cited in the New York Post reiterating that CIA was behind the JFK assassination. He said that a congressional investigation ten years after the Warren Commission’s probe found strong evidence of CIA’s key role in the JFK assassination:
“And most of the people in that investigation believe that it was the CIA that was behind it — because the evidence was overwhelming to them.”
In his book The Man Who Killed Kennedy, conservative political analyst and Republican political consultant Roger Stone concluded that President Lyndon Johnson was a key player in the JFK assassination. Johnson, Vice President under John F. Kennedy, succeeded JFK to become the President. He established the Warren Commission to investigate the JFK assassination, which found that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK as a lone actor and not in collusion with anyone.
On Thursday (January 23), Trump signed an executive order to declassify the files of the three assassinations – JFK, RFK, and MLK Jr. Signing the order, Trump called it a “big one” for which a lot of people have waited for decades. Trump added, “And everything will be revealed.”
While the action thrilled the conservatives across the country and even aborad, some conservative analysts opine that the remains of the Biden administration in Trump’s new administration may create some hurdle in carrying out the declassification order. Former State Department official Mike Benz, who founded the Foundation for Freedom Online, told Real America’s Voice that the current head of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Stacey Dixon, is a Biden appointee who follows an anti-Trump agenda. She has about two decades of service in the CIA. Benz said that there is speculation that Dixon may be working behind the scenes to sabotage the confirmation of Tulsi Gabbard as the incoming Director of National Intelligence (DNI). Benz doubted that Dixon will carry out the declassification order in a timely manner.
“What is one thing that scares the deep state out of its sleep? Revealing the truth hidden from the public eye by the intelligence community that could likely expose their role in high-profile assassinations and other crimes against the people of America. ”
You have got to be kidding, right?
Liberals, party of the 60’s movement, protecting the FBI, CIA, and NSA……wants to protect them now? That’s rich. Snowden is a Sander’s supporter…..does he protect the FBI, CIA, and NSA?
Another perfect story for The Dumpster.
The Deep state is neither Liberal or Conservative.
That is why it is the deep state!
This is Federal agencies protecting the F ups made by federal agencies!
As a boomer generation Independent, I am in favor of this. At the time, G.H.W. Bush was director of the CIA. Tired of protecting the Bush family for their involvement, and others like Herbert Hoover! And LBJ! And Giancanni the mobster! Hang’em all! Declassify the records! We deserve the truth before we age out! My bet is that the GOP was very involved!!!
Hi Tom. Why did you tell me off and blast me for saying something against you when it was not directed at you at all? You had to get something off your chest and picked me to tell off? That was the second time you did that. The first was when you said you wanted me dead. YES, you did! What do you suppose I could do with that and to you? I should do something. Maybe I have already. You simply cannot go around setting your anger on people to get them to believe your lies and untruths. I will put this out every time you post so EVERYONE sees this message. You have gone too far. You do not own me so get that out of your head. Don’t even say you don’t because you show it in your posts at me. I bet you won’t even respond or apologise either because you don’t know how to be a big man! You just have to take down the female gender.
Back at you next time!
AF you are full of lies. I never said I wanted you dead. You have also accused others of this. It is not working for you! So take your medications and come back to reality. The last post I wrote against you was instigated by you, not me. You were the aggressor. So just move on. I have. And stop using institution computers to communicate. It is your choice to be a wingnut. It is my choice not to respond if that is what I wish.
Tom, it has been assimilated, resistance is futile. Like talking to a wall. Well, one brick shy of perhaps. She sees dead people. They are all replaced by clones. She waits for the signal that never comes. She is all Trump, all the time. She thinks you are trying to own her. Because she can be owned. She has tracked your computer to an institution, her specialty. It has been assimilated, resistance is futile. Don’t take down the female gender because she knows all Democratic women in office are whores who slept their way into office as dei peter-principle achievements. Resistance is futile; I said it three times, it must be true.
I spell my name: danger, and she is not.
Two years.
Resistance 2.0
LOL Frank, yeah she is a real Borg!
So the CIA is said to be written all over the JFK assassination, but what about the FBI? If you watch Oliver Stone’s “JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass” you’ll see how the FBI did most/all the cover-up. At the end of it all, you could argue it’s two sides of the same coin – the intel community.
WTP: we will see, but perhaps wait for the evidence before you rush to judgement.
First, it’s pretty well hashed out at this point, and while we can point lots of fingers, we have more than a shadow of doubt. Many have concluded it’s more that Oswald with differing end points on that chain. Be careful what you ask for. If it is the intelligence community, it’s post WWII, it’s GOP written all over that.
Plus, if Oswald is a dupe, a patsy, so stupid as to not leave a trail to his owners for protection against death, then —– why not the Trump Republican assassination with Secret Service input. Think about it: one loan Republican fires into the crowd as ordered. Trump grabs his ear, spills the blood pouch, goes down, and secret service finish the blood art work and the rest is history. Remember, the doctors never were allowed to speak. Rumor has it they are rich now. Wag the dog. So, be careful what you ask for.
Chances are we will learn little new, see some confusion, mistakes, and perhaps a little more inuendo about different folks and groups already suspected. I would be surprised if we find a smoking gun because if we do, someone gots some real splaining to do about why they hid it…….so poorly.
Funny little conspiracy theory. Too obviously false to even qualify for a conspiracy theory. But shows the liberalTDS-infested brain (or lack thereof). A simple reminder, this article here is about the declassification of JFK documents not Trump – at least I read it so. Not a shocker that you are upset about truth coming out of the docs. You are always upset about anything Trump says or does. It’s like seeing Trump makes your bowels inflamed. How sad and kinda funny too 🙂
You may be a fool, but don’t be a tool. You are jumping to conclusions that oswald is not the master-mind, but a dupe and others, the intelligence alphabet, or the mafia, or…. are guilty and this info will shed light on that.
My point is a similar argument to yours can be made to the recent Trump tragedy. Hey, shots fired, he grabs his ear and goes down. Some folks some distance away are hit in the crowd. The SS is on top of him, he gets up and voila, a little blood. My point is, in both cases, if one wants, one can see conspiracy, and in Trump’s case, perhaps a wag-the-dog moment. The doctors were not allowed to speak of his wounds. Why? Where are those doctors today? Are they alive? How are there bank accounts? Normal? Bloated? I do not believe anything except what’s been told so far, but you have to see that there’s as much conspiracy life there as in the JFK, MLK, or RFK assassinations. Goes with the territory.
I do push back on Trump actions. Often. But less often than you pushed back on Biden OR any Democrat, including me. I am sorry for you taking joy in another’s bowels. Work on that weakness.
I am not upset at hearing the truth. I wonder why so many have already jumped to believing we will learn much of anything that leads to a conspiracy by the intelligence community or anyone else. And I propose a Trumpian similarity that indeed, one could make the “grassy knoll” description in his assassination attempt too.
Seems you are both a fool and a tool in a hopeless propaganda machinery that already has failed to stop Trump from winning back the White House.
Unlike you, I’m not jumping to conclusions but cited a well-researched documentary that shows the documented records from the decades-long history of the case. What have you brought to the table? Well, your endless gas pipe for sure. But what else?
You have not shown any evidence that the blood is fake or the bullets were fake. And if any of it was fake, that would points to Biden admin covering up – and Trump being part of it. So your questions are baseless and lack any research or substance. And as usual you don’t have a point. We sure see a conspiracy in both cases – the conspiracy of assassination. In one case it succeeded. In the other, it failed.
You claim the doctors treating Trump were not allowed to speak of his wounds. Not allowed by whom? On what basis are you claiming they were not allowed? Well go ahead and do your research if you have claims. And feel free to return with your findings. But then I am asking somebody to do research when he can’t find the published news of an appeal in the Trump case. Speak of IQ, lols.
You are your own little circus. Work on that theatre Frankie Mouse Danger (is that how you spell it?).
Take your TDS glasses off so your pushing stops hurting your gas chamber. ROFL.
WTP: you jump from “let’s see the info, there’s a conspiracy” to which I pushback and you jump to: “Seems you are both a fool and a tool in a hopeless propaganda machinery that already has failed to stop Trump from winning back the White House” because you claim I have TDS? I think you have LSTC, love-sucking-trump’s-cock disease…. What does that have to do with the Kennedy conspiracy?
And your source is the liberal Oliver Stone’s documentary that he put together to cover JFK, his first attempt, a movie “Stone described this account as a “counter-myth” to the Warren Commission’s “fictional myth”. Good flick though.
In JFK revisited, Stone uncovers what he covered up in JFK calling it: “an important bookend to my 1991 film. It ties up many loose threads, and hopefully repudiates much of the ignorance around the case and the movie”. Originally conceived as a four-hour epic under the title JFK: Destiny Betrayed,[5] the film is narrated by Whoopi Goldberg and Donald Sutherland, two more liberals and runs 118 minutes, not the 240 minutes envisioned. Is there a conspiracy about the 122 missing minutes from the 4 hour vision?
From WIKI, what the critics said: “On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 63% of 27 critics’ reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.1/10. The website’s consensus reads: “Although it’s frustratingly casual with the line between facts and conjecture, JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass reaffirms Oliver Stone’s gifts as an engaging raconteur.” Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 55 out of 100, based on 7 critics, indicating “mixed or average” reviews.”
So, not a great flick, Stone basically raises the same old conjectures with feeling and facts, but there is no smoking gun.
Yes, I can’t wait to see the disclosures, but my point was: “we will see, but perhaps wait for the evidence before you rush to judgement.” My point still stands, but I hope you will get confirmation of your liberally made documentary created to cover his first attempt.
Good discussion: thanks.
I didn’t read about Stone’s documentary and haven’t read much Stone too. I just saw the documentary as my friend invited me to join him seeing it and I found it very well-done and sourced/referenced from the public records/documents. I don’t care about what those critics say as their opinions are often politically biased/influenced. If I find a movie good whether it is because I like the merits of the presentation. By that standard, I chose not to watch the movie “My Son Hunter” some years ago. Despite having no respect for that guy, I found the movie poorly crafted in the first few scenes and chose not to waste my time on it.
Since I didn’t read about Stone’s documentary I am curious to learn what was omitted from the original footage of the movie. Who ‘envisioned” 240 minutes for it? I have never heard of a movie that long. This length of footage usually makes a mini-series but not a movie. Audiences usually don’t have the stamina or time to site 4 hours straight for a movie. So it may well have been a presentation issue. But a conspiracy? If there was one, the only thing that comes to mind is political pressure to omit something important that could expose someone important. Would be great to see it.
Oh, and yes you do have TDS. It shows. 🙂
WTP: good discussion, and again, my point was: “we will see, but perhaps wait for the evidence before you rush to judgement.” My point still stands, but I hope you will get confirmation of your liberally made documentary created to cover his first attempt.
Stone footage was just a red herring they noted and I added the conspiracy footnote to show how easy the mundane can turn mysterious. Just because the answer is not definitive does not mean it’s a conspiracy. Who knows why the cut: given the movie’s returns, maybe a few more? But I was just fooling around, sorry, should have LOL’d it. Chances are it was his vision and the footage was never even shot to be edited. Doubt there were any politics involved, to your point, there was no profit in it to begin with. Not many saw the movie anyway,
You say I have TDS. But perhaps I am just spot on and you can’t see it because you are Trump blind. My supposed TDS is generally backed by facts so protest the facts, not attack the person. Go for it whenever you want.
Stone is a great director but has always trifled with the truth to make a good story. Let’s face it: Platoon is great and Dafoe’s legacy was cast in celluloid at that moment. But on the JFK flicks, most say the fact mixes with the fiction so well that sometimes it’s hard to tell apart. And Stone is not telling either.
Again, great to see the info, don’t expect the silver bullet, probably just more fodder for conspiracy, and it’s wrong to pre-judge before it’s released one way or the other.
My Son Hunter —- oh yeah, gonna miss that one.
But if you need the truth, try Serenity. Best movie ever. And then follow up with the FOX series, “firefly” which is the precursor to Josh Whedon’s masterpiece of truth. SHINY. Note both shows have a single set for the ship, one contiguous set instead of many sets scattered about the lot. That means all actors must be together most of the time. In Blue Bloods, the only time the actors get together is specific scenes for a few, or the dinner scene for all. In Whedon’s they were always together which makes for fantastic character interrelationships. He gets around swearing censors by using Chinese which is explained by the Earth’s future, the truth is we all may need to learn Chinese :>). Then the basic plot is cowboys in space, sure, what could go wrong with that. But he pulls it all off perfectly. Serenity follows Firefly, but it stands on it’s own. Watch first and if you love it, watch the Firefly series precursor. Then watch Serenity again. “what was that?” “Half of writing history is hiding the truth.”
But the best: “So no more runnin’. I aim to misbehave.” And I am.
Enjoy!!!!
Your point is lost when you mention waiting for evidence while I already cited the documented evidence in the documentary. What you are doing in an attempt to win the argument here is the time-tried fallacy of “we don’t know better yet” which is a convenient way of ignoring the facts. What will actually prove your point – if you have any – is take a specific instance of the documented evidence presented in the documentary that showed the attempted cover-up, counter with evidence from the same or other sources, and thus make a case for your point.
Now what you have instead argued is the opinion of others/critics as to what they are saying and there as well no real countering of any specific points with any contrary evidence. As I already said, the opinion of critics/reviewers is not credible because it’s just an opinion and is likely influenced by the person’s own political leaning.
Your conviction that your TDS is backed by “facts” is a key symptom of the TDS itself. And thank you for admitting that the evidence needs to be separate from the person. So Feel free to present your evidence.
What is not seen is not being judged here. I judged what was shown and it’s clear enough to arrive at a judgment. It shows a conspiracy to hide what the people hiding it don’t want the public to see.
I have long stopped watching fiction movies/series but I kinda remember the name Serenity. What truth it refers to in the real world around us? That history is not definitive or conclusive? I don’t have to watch anything to agree. What it does at best is make our facts and truths subjective and fragmented. We can look at one fragment a time and assess its truth value. A lot of this uncertainty also comes from suppressed/hidden fragments – much like classified documents – the fence around the truth. So it’s exciting to have that fence removed.
WTP: Yes, you cited documented evidence as shown in Stone’s movie. What I said was 1) there is no conclusionary proof that Oswald was not the sole assassin, 2) there is no conclusionary proof that anyone else was in on it, and 3) many think Stone’s movie is a mix of documented evidence, assumptions, and myth. But most important, my point was don’t rush to judgement before the info release, don’t expect to find a smoking gun, and —- it’s a good thing to release the info.
Heck, I hate the 72-year rule for census release; I want to know where my relatives ended up :>) Getting the 1950 in 2022 was fun, but have to wait to 2032 for 1960? I need to know documented evidence that I exist :>)
There is very little I can do to point to the fact there is no other answer, no conspiracy, than beyond what has been done. It is hard to disprove a myth for which conclusionary evidence does not exist. Yes you have documented evidence, but Stone also mixes conjectures and assumptions as if they are documented evidence and he is very slick at doing it. That’s why his movies are so captivating. Try this: *https://quillette.com/2023/03/14/at-the-corner-of-camp-and-lafayette/* Now I won’t say that an anti-conspiracy theorist is better than a conspiracy theorist, but certainly gives me pause that the newly released data will provide the smoking gun that Stone has not.
And why you go back to my suspected TDS when talking JFK is a stretch. Like I said the last time you said it, generally I have factual proof in the form of sources, facts, and links, to what I post.
I am sorry you only watch factual movies. And I was just kidding about it’s relevance, it’s truth, but I will say fiction can tell us many truths. The one’s in Serenity and Firefox and old tried and true gems. Yes, it will be exciting to see the info hidden for so many years. But, as I said, don’t expect the smoking gun. And if you use Stone et al as definitive proof, know that many factually disagree, some say he did it for the money, and that too may be made more definitive as well by the release.
Well what the documented proof of cover-up shows is that the government lied about conclusive proof of a lone shooter and combined with the fact that the government docs were hidden for decades is strong evidence of foul play. The question is why did government lie and attempted to change/manipulate the evidence to sell the single-bullet theory? So it is conclusive proof that the government lied and tried to tuck it under the rug for decades. Lesson learnt: don’t rush to trust what the authorities/official probes tell you.
I find it interesting that you appreciate fiction on the screen but are reluctant to embrace documented evidence of foul play and cover-up by a fact-sharing filmmaker or at least downplay it. In cases like these, the cover-up is the smoking gun – and Stone found it and shared it. But the hand that used the gun is privileged so I don’t expect that hand to be found, or at least named, let alone held accountable.
You keep bringing back your TDS and claiming your so-called “factual proof” with which I disagree so I also mentioned your TDS and the self-stated nature of your alleged proof. Links to opinion or speculation or politically jaundiced reports don’t count as established or conclusive proof – it’s just the same claim shared by others.
I’m actually glad that I don’t watch fiction movies anymore or read fiction. Truth is usually stranger and more mind-blowing than fiction. The opinion on Stone’s work is divided and I can claim that many agree with him and accept his work as factual, more so than the official narrative full of holes. But yes, it’ll be interesting to see what comes out in those docs and hopefully more docs declassified by Trump soon.
Dude, you miss the point: I am more than willing to accept documented data from reliable sources. I just keep saying, you don’t have it yet, what you have is a mix of documented, verifiable data with assumptions, guesses, and conjectures to make a story into a myth, and, most important, don’t expect this new data to be a smoking gun. More likely, more of the same as in believers will find belief and skeptics will find skepticism. I am in neither camp, but the alternate theory has not been factually proven even with Stone’s documentation. Stone is not Ken Burns, many agree with me, and here’s the NPR view: *https://www.npr.org/2025/01/28/nx-s1-5273544/kennedy-mlk-assassinations-documents-trump*
To your opinion, here’s a great summary: *chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1286&context=fac_pm*
Again, can’t wait to see the data. Your mind is already made up so it will not change. But I am pretty sure I will still be on the fence as to irrefutable evidence, beyond a shadow of a doubt, will be found. And, according to many experts, it has not yet.
The TDS stuff is a red herring; if you have an issue with my facts, show me or STFU. You know I will question yours, provide evidence, and if you decide you don’t like it, therefore it’s tainted somehow, again — show me the source is invalid or STFU. But enough with the generalities, the whitewash, either be specific or go home. Don’t mean to be crude, but just saying I generally lie, or that my sources are generally jaundiced if you don’t like their facts, is a bogus generalization aimed to whitewash the purveyor as a false narrative. As always: PROVE IT. That’s why we are here.
So—- what have we proved. That there are many alternative theories to the Warren Commission’s findings. Guess what, can say similar for MX, MLK, and RFK. See a pattern here. And IF that were true ——- what about the Trump assassination attempts. The guy was a Republican, isn’t that strange? No doctors were allowed to speak as to injuries, how weird is that to protect the sanctity of Trump’ ear. Why were only people in the crowd significantly hurt. Did you see how the SService hid what was happening? If that was a magic trick, that’s the point you would say: I know how they did it. So many questions, when will they release the secrets? What about the glass shards, who was saying that and where did they go. The interim report came out in October. It says:
“The Report Contains Eight Key Findings: 
There was inadequate planning and coordination by the Secret Service with state and local law enforcement before and during the July 13 rally.
The Secret Service did not place the AGR complex that the shooter fired from, and the surrounding area, inside of the secure perimeter.
Local sniper teams positioned inside the AGR complex had a narrow field of vision and were not positioned to monitor the full AGR property.
There was no unified command post to facilitate communications between the Secret Service and its state and local partners
Critical pieces of information about Crooks and the escalating threat situation at the AGR complex moved slowly due to fragmented lines of communication and unclear chains of command on July 13.
Testimony from local law enforcement indicates that they fired a shot at Crooks prior to the USSS sniper firing the kill shot.
Crooks did not use a ladder to access the AGR roof. Instead, he climbed on the roof using an air conditioning unit.
The autopsy report indicates a single bullet killed Crooks.
And here we go: *https://www.npr.org/2024/07/14/nx-s1-5039234/examining-how-narratives-about-the-trump-assassination-attempt-are-resonating*
Assassinations and conspiracy theories are like grilled cheese and tomato soup, just meant to be. I keep an open mind but again, suggest after release, you and I will be in the same place with neither of us having significant new information. Just a suggestion, don’t really know until release.
As to your disdain of fiction — your loss. Yet, I wonder — what’s your stand on the Bible? Nothing pointed, just wonder, because my take is great recollections from a group of men over time and the principles are my beliefs. But factual, NBL.
One last point: here’s a great summary of all your possible alternative theories: *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories*
Unless you have new info, I think this cake is baked. It is funny that as a lefty, and you a righty, that you are looking for what undoubtedly would end up being hard-right advocates killing JFK. I am fine with it’s just a nut who got a as lucky some shots off as Trump’s luck in the near miss. FYI: which I am glad they missed, whoever was really behind it, and my pick, he said humorously, is PENCE.
Or I missed the point because there was none. To return your iteration, I keep saying that you have none either since the undeniable cover-up proven by documented evidence shows the story fed to the public was false. Now you need to come up with a defense backed up by documented evidence – and thus far you have offered none, like in your previous replies. Endlessly repeating yourself doesn’t change it.
I stopped reading the leftist NPR after the first few paras. A professor talking about his “guess” has nothing to do with facts or evidence. So you gotta some up with something credible, something substantial.
I pointed to a cover-up and you have not come up with any evidence to refute it. So you can pretend to sit on the fence when actually you are living in denial.
Your facts? Lols. Still waiting for any. Feel free to share. And yes your sources are not credible. I wonder if you really read them yourself.
Why is it strange that a guy who had registered as Republican would shoot at Trump? Not every Republican likes Trump or even votes for Trump. Does every Democrat vote the Democrat candidate? Can you prove that every Democrat voted Kamala in 2024? What is obvious is that Thomas Crook was an anti-Trumper and those are some of the most vile and criminal-minded people out there. Hence the assassination attempt.
You claim no doctors were “allowed to speak.” Is it so? Do you have evidence that the doctors received orders from anyone not to talk about the nature of Trump’s wounds? To my knowledge some of the people in the crowd were hurt but one even died. You referred to the interim report – a Biden admin report which was a stakeholder in this assassination attempt so it is not credible.
Now to the points of the interim report, you fail to specify your conclusion. What exactly is your point there – if any at all? I am skipping the NPR link for the reason mentioned above.
I don’t have a “disdain” of fiction. Just a lack of interest. These are different things. Fiction has its value and I had my share of it. But now I am interested in real life stuff as in news/media/investigative journalism/analysis.
I don’t have a stand on bible. I never read the book fully as I am secular and don’t take it as a literal real historical work. What is your take on Bible and other religious books?
Skipping the wiki link as unnecessary and already discussed.
Your comment on hard-right killing JFK is again irrelevant. Unless you back it up with evidence, it is just waste of time and virtual space. For the Trump assassination attempt, whoever was really behind it is now watching and reeling since Trump lived through it and defeated his/her ambitions (some name it Kamala) to win back the White House. Speak of grand scheme of things!
I cannot provide a source that you will believe because you believe no sources that an will provide. You say NPR is leftist, they lean left of center but are not leftist; you are extreme right biased. Stone is a hollywood lefist too. Likewise, you have documentation but also conjecture and cannot prove your case. But who cares. My points about the new data stand for they are opinion and against that opinion, your story is moot.
Cake is still baked.
I tend to question sources that base their claims on conjectures of so-called “experts” without solid evidence to back up their claims.
NPR is certified leftist. “Left of center” is to “leftist” what “sugarcoated” is to “coated with sugar”. Always enjoy the left’s play of words. Wasn’t it Hillary who [in]famously told us not to call GMO food “genetically modified” because it sounds Frankensteinish and instead call it “drought-resistant” variety of food?
Your cake of self-proclaimed points and unproven claims is getting stale. So why don’t just eat it? You sure can’t have it after all 🙂
“I tend to question sources that base their claims on conjectures of so-called “experts” without solid evidence to back up their claims.”
Well, no duh. But you draw your line with maga-colored glasses that sees “leans left” as “certified leftist.” Now, if you apply the same code to the right —– that leaves you no media, no experts, to believe which pretty much means a discussion with the completely closed mind.
I read left, right, and center, take the right with a grain of salt as in get multiple confirming sources, but I do not unilaterally toss out as you do.
Hillary? Really? Wasn’t it Trump that said: “grab em by the pussy?” Let me guess, you didn’t believe him and thought it some kind of joke, braggadocio, whatever. Point is you are very closed off in your maga-only world of lies.
1. Stone’s movie has documented evidence; his first take: JFK failed the sniff test, so he booked ended it with a documentary
2, The documentary has documented evidence; it also has conjecture, both are blended as supposed fact.
3. Many experts offer many factual questions to JFK and the follow-up documentary
4. You believe him, evidence and conjectures
5. I am not convinced, have provided expert witnesses and facts as to why. You discount every one.
6. Trump is releasing new evidence
7. My point was you can’t pre-judge it and probably you will be in no different position after it is released. I provided expert witnesses as to that point. You discount every one.
8. We will see.
Yes “leans left” is the libs’ go-to term for certified left/leftist just as Hillary’s “drought-resistant” is to people’s “genetically modified” – cited earlier and remaining valid.
You say: “I read left, right, and center, take the right with a grain of salt as in get multiple confirming sources, but I do not unilaterally toss out as you do.” Well you expect me to take your word for it. But I don’t have any means to verify it. And I’m afraid I don’t feel like taking your word for it or anything. So you are just advertising yourself and adding rating stars to your own credibility. Objectively, it means nothing.
Trump was doing the kind of talk that many/most guys do about women – what you call the locker-room talk. And if it’s not about what-aboutism, then how come you go to Trump on me citing Hillary? Also Hillary publicly called for manipulating language. Trump didn’t. His private talk was leaked. If what you do in your privacy is leaked, it would be a whole different matter from what you teach a class or tell press on a public stage. Ever heard of something called difference in setting? Probably not for your level of low intel.
Your points 1 to 8 are useless repetition and regurgitation of claims that lack evidence and have no point or reason to validate their meaning. Maybe you would like to try again in a more coherent and comprehendible manner.
8. We will see
Haha, yeah cz you had to say something. I can see that. 🙂