Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Trump: The Second Amendment Will NEVER Be Repealed

<p>After the retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens&rsquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;New York Times op-ed arguing to repeal the second amendment was published&comma; President Donald Trump was quick to respond&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;THE SECOND AMENDMENT WILL NEVER BE REPEALED&excl; As much as Democrats would like to see this happen&comma; and despite the words yesterday of former Supreme Court Justice Stevens&comma; NO WAY&period; We need more Republicans in 2018 and must ALWAYS hold the Supreme Court&excl;&rdquo&semi; tweeted Trump on Wednesday&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Over the weekend&comma; there were a series of protests as part of the March for Our Lives movement&comma; a student-led demonstration&nbsp&semi;in support of introducing stricter gun control&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The White House issued a statement applauding &&num;8220&semi;the many courageous young Americans exercising their First Amendment rights today&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The White House deputy press secretary Lindsay Walters&nbsp&semi;also said&comma; &ldquo&semi;keeping our children safe is a top priority of the President&&num;8217&semi;s&comma; which is why he urged Congress to pass the Fix NICS and STOP School Violence Acts&comma; and signed them into law&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>On Tuesday&comma; the New York Times took advantage of the anti-gun momentum and published the controversial op-ed titled &ldquo&semi;John Paul Stevens&colon; Repeal the Second Amendment&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Stevens argues that the Second Amendment gives the National Rifle Association too much power and repealing the law may be the only solution&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;That decision &mdash&semi; which I remain convinced was wrong and certainly was debatable &mdash&semi; has provided the N&period;R&period;A&period; with a propaganda weapon of immense power&period; Overturning that decision via a constitutional amendment to get rid of the Second Amendment would be simple and would do more to weaken the N&period;R&period;A&period;&rsquo&semi;s ability to stymie legislative debate and block constructive gun control legislation than any other available option&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes Stevens&period; &ldquo&semi;It would eliminate the only legal rule that protects sellers of firearms in the United States &mdash&semi; unlike every other market in the world&period; It would make our schoolchildren safer than they have been since 2008 and honor the memories of the many&comma; indeed far too many&comma; victims of recent gun violence&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>However&comma; as Trump points out&comma; there is a conservative majority in the Supreme Court&comma; meaning this is highly unlikely to happen&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>Author&rsquo&semi;s note&colon;<&sol;strong> The Second Amendment will remain&period; It&rsquo&semi;s a right for a reason&period; The conservative majority could potentially remain in the Supreme Court for at least two more generations&period; Anthony Kennedy is 81&comma; Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 85&comma; and Stephen G&period;&nbsp&semi;Breyer is 79&period; If two out of the three are replaced with conservatives&comma; then a majority is assured for a long time&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version