Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Trump Surveillance: Who Gave Nunes Those Classified Docs?

<p><a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;punchingbagpost&period;com&sol;trump-in-wiretapping-claim-gathers-support-and-momentum&sol;" target&equals;"&lowbar;blank"><strong>As I wrote in a previous article<&sol;strong><&sol;a>&comma; Republican lawmakers are pushing to discover who gave the order to &ldquo&semi;unmask&rdquo&semi; members of the Trump team in the &ldquo&semi;incidentally&rdquo&semi; gathered information that was widely &lpar;and illegally&rpar; disseminated in an effort to wound Trump&rsquo&semi;s reputation before the election&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes &lpar;R-CA&rpar;&comma; who saw the classified information&comma; has confirmed that the documents contained &ldquo&semi;details about US persons associated with the incoming administration&period;&rdquo&semi; The documents contained &ldquo&semi;little or no apparent foreign intelligence value&rdquo&semi; and were &ldquo&semi;widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting&period;&&num;8221&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><em>Fox News<&sol;em> reported last Friday that a high-ranking senior intelligence official was responsible&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;We&rsquo&semi;ve learned that the surveillance that led to the unmasking of what started way before President Trump was even the GOP nominee&comma;&rdquo&semi; reports <em>Fox News&rsquo&semi;<&sol;em> Adam Housley&period; &ldquo&semi;The person who did the unmasking&comma; I&rsquo&semi;m told&comma; is very well known&comma; very high up&comma; very senior in the intelligence world and is not in the FBI&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;We&rsquo&semi;re told that the main issue here Is not only the unmasking of the names&comma; but the spreading of names for political purposes that have nothing to do with national security and everything to do with hurting and embarrassing Trump and his team&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><em>Fox<&sol;em> also cited sources suggesting that Nunes knew about the existence of the information in January &ndash&semi; long before Trump&rsquo&semi;s March 4th wiretapping claim&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Nunes met with an unnamed source on Tuesday&comma; March 21st to view the documents&period; There is much confusion surrounding the details of the meeting&comma; which occured at night on White House grounds&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;Chairman Nunes met with his source at the White House grounds in order to have proximity to a secure location where he could view the information provided by the source&comma;&rdquo&semi; said a Nunes spokesman&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Nunes briefed Trump on the situation the following day&comma; during which he suggested that the information may have been gathered via FISA warrants&period; Such warrants are classified&comma; and many are now claiming that Nunes revealed classified information during a press release&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer says Nunes could not have received the classified information from the White House&colon; &ldquo&semi;I don&rsquo&semi;t know why he would come up to brief the president on something that we gave him&period;&&num;8221&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Nunes has promised never to reveal the name of his source&comma; but <em>The New York Times<&sol;em> has blamed&nbsp&semi;White House officials Michael Ellis and Ezra Cohen-Watnick&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The &ldquo&semi;obsessions with who talked to whom&comma; and when&comma; is not the answer&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Spicer&period; &ldquo&semi;It should be the substance&rdquo&semi; of the documents&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Nunes is now facing criticism for not keeping this information secret&comma; and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has asked him to recuse himself from his committee&rsquo&semi;s investigation&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Some believe that Nunes was given access to the classified information to distract him from the committee&rsquo&semi;s investigation into the alleged Russia-Trump connection and to bolster Trump&rsquo&semi;s claims of having been spied on&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Nunes argues that he had a &ldquo&semi;duty&rdquo&semi; to tell the president and has apologized to members of the House Intelligence Committee for bypassing them&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Adam Schiff &lpar;D-CA&rpar;&comma; a fellow member of the House Intelligence Committee&comma; believes the White House was trying to &ldquo&semi;launder&rdquo&semi; intel through Nunes&period; &ldquo&semi;Why all the cloak and dagger stuff&quest;&rdquo&semi; he asks&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;The White House has yet to explain why senior White House staff apparently shared these materials with but one member of either committee&comma; only for their contents to be briefed back to the White House&comma;&rdquo&semi; argues Schiff &lpar;D-CA&rpar;&period; Last Thursday&comma; Schiff accepted an invitation to view the documents&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&&num;8212&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><em>We&rsquo&semi;d like to point out that Nunes is not law enforcement&comma; and Trump is the victim here&period; This has nothing to do with any other possible ongoing investigation&period; Once this is publicized&comma; we expect either the FBI or a special prosecutor will be assigned to investigate&period;<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version