Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Trump (Not Obama) Deserves Credit for the Booming Economy

<p class&equals;"p1">Often people argue that the credit of the economic performance during the first year of any president&&num;8217&semi;s term should be given to his predecessor&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">Within the first year of a presidency&comma; both Democrats and Republicans claim that it was their policies that were responsible for any of the recent growth<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">But most of the 68 economists surveyed in a recent <em>Wall Street Journal<&sol;em> poll&comma; suggest that President Donald Trump&comma; not Obama&comma; is responsible for fostering the recent booming economy&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">&&num;8220&semi;A majority said the president had been &ldquo&semi;somewhat&rdquo&semi; or &ldquo&semi;strongly&rdquo&semi; positive for job creation&comma; gross domestic product growth and the rising stock market&comma;&&num;8221&semi; writes <em>The Hill <&sol;em>about the <em>WSJ<&sol;em> report&period; &&num;8220&semi;The pros cite the White House&rsquo&semi;s push for lighter regulation and the recent tax bill as critical to a pro-growth environment&semi; more than 90 percent of the group thought the tax bill would boost GDP expansion over the next two years&period;&&num;8221&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">Last year&comma; in the same survey&comma; Obama received mixed responses about if his policies encouraged GDP growth and long-term growth&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">In the first three quarters of last year&comma; spending on capital goods increased&comma; along with wage hikes&ndash&semi; all because companies were optimistic that the Trump administration would de-regularized and cut taxes drastically&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">Since January&comma; the Trump administration has rolled back or delayed 1&comma;600 planned regulatory actions&period; Obama&comma; on the other hand&comma; had plans to introduce thousands of business-halting regulations&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">&ldquo&semi;We have spent the past dozen years or longer operating in environments that have had an increasing regulatory burden&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Michael S&period; Burke&comma; the chairman and chief executive of Aecom to the <em>New York Times&period;<&sol;em> &ldquo&semi;That burden has slowed down economic growth&comma; it&rsquo&semi;s slowed down investment in infrastructure&period; And what we&rsquo&semi;ve seen over the last year is a big deregulatory environment&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">As the <em>New York Times even&nbsp&semi;<&sol;em>said&comma; in terms of business there has been a &ldquo&semi;wave of optimism&rdquo&semi; during Trump&&num;8217&semi;s presidency that has been &ldquo&semi;beginning to translate into the sort of investment in new plants&comma; equipment and factory upgrades that bolster economic growth&comma; spurs job creation &mdash&semi; and may finally raise wages significantly&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">However&comma; Democrats continue to belittle the bonuses and raises that are being given in response to the new GOP tax bill&period; Over two million workers have already received raises and bonuses and it&&num;8217&semi;s just the beginning&period;&nbsp&semi;Not to mention&comma; the stock market has had its best-ever first year under a new administration since the 1940s&period;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">&&num;8220&semi;Some industries have seen particularly clear changes in fortune&period; The Trump administration has reversed a number of environmental protections that would have imposed significant costs on energy companies&period; Mr&period; Trump&rsquo&semi;s appointees to the Federal Communications Commission voted last month to repeal so-called net neutrality rules&comma; which treated internet services as a regulated industry&comma; like power lines&comma; and prohibited broadband providers from charging for faster internet service or from blocking or slowing some websites&comma;&&num;8221&semi; writes the <em>New York Times&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;em><&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p1"><span class&equals;"s1">Ultimately&comma; the tax plan &ldquo&semi;will increase the level of gross domestic product in the long run by 2&period;2 percent&period; To put that number in perspective&comma; the increase in GDP translates into an increase of just under &dollar;3&comma;000 per household&comma;&rdquo&semi; according to The Heritage Foundation&&num;8217&semi;s predictions&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p2"><strong>Author&&num;8217&semi;s note&colon;<&sol;strong>&nbsp&semi;As Americans continue to reap the benefits of the Trump presidency&comma; Democrats soon won&&num;8217&semi;t have a leg to stand on&period; Belittling the recent raises and bonuses given by businesses in response to the GOP tax plan only makes them look petty&period; Trump&&num;8217&semi;s election gave businesses the confidence to increase spending that influenced the current economic boom&period; Businesses crave predictability and Trump gave it to them&comma; along with a favorable tax plan and consistency in policy&period; While Obama inherited a recession&comma; he proved to be inept in handling it&period; It took so long to get any kind of recovery&period; Most of Obama&&num;8217&semi;s policies were not business friendly and only halted their growth&comma; which also helped keep the recovery slow-moving&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"p2"><strong>Editor&&num;8217&semi;s note&colon;<&sol;strong> I don&&num;8217&semi;t know about you guys&comma; but &dollar;1000 is still a nice chunk of change&period; Very unsettling of the Democrats to say that is insignificant&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version