
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s well-known that CNN leans left in its coverage, often leading to questions about the reliability of its political reporting. However, a <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/08/politics/pentagon-officials-discussing-trump/index.html">recent article</a> brings up issues worth examining. While figures like General Lloyd Austin will be out, and with General Mark Milley retired and John Kelly not in consideration for anything anywhere, there&#8217;s a pressing need to address other military leaders if this report holds any truth. A complete restructuring may be necessary, potentially removing an entire tier of management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For acts that could amount to treason.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to CNN, &#8220;Pentagon officials are holding informal discussions about how the Department of Defense would respond if Donald Trump issues orders to deploy active-duty troops domestically and fire large swaths of apolitical staffers, defense officials told CNN.&#8221;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If accurate, this suggests certain military officers are already planning to undermine the orders of a lawfully elected president. Such preemptive actions would be aimed at obstructing the objectives of the commander-in-chief. In essence, this could be construed as aiding enemies of the U.S. &#8211; i.e. disloyalty or even treason.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over recent years (and notably during the eight years before Trump’s presidency), we’ve witnessed transformations within the military. Programs emphasizing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), as well as mandatory training on critical race theory, have become more common. Additionally, physical standards have been relaxed to accommodate a broader range of recruits. This environment seems to favor individuals with ideologies more aligned with Democratic priorities, creating a military base that may resist Republican directives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to CNN, this appears to be exactly what some hope for: “Gen. Mark Milley who took steps to limit Trump’s ability to use nuclear weapons while he was chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.&#8221; Who elected him? Is this even true?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Look at Trump’s record during his first term. He did not misuse or deploy troops improperly. The notion that he would pose a unique threat justifying a treasonous military workaround is unfounded.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While I believe the competence of the military remains strong, recent administrations have seemingly promoted individuals based on political leanings rather than skill. This trend extends beyond the military, likely impacting the CIA, FBI, DOJ, and other agencies as well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is crucial that Trump, if re-elected, addresses this on day one. Dismantling the so-called &#8220;deep state&#8221; starts by reestablishing control over the executive branch, removing Democratic appointees embedded within the government, and scrutinizing the promotion history of personnel to ensure that military and civilian roles reflect merit, not political loyalty.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This course of action carries risks. Political firings could become a slippery slope, fostering cycles of ideological loyalty as a qualification for certain roles. However, it’s evident that Democrats have already embedded political operatives within the bureaucracy, converted numerous appointees to permanent government roles, and prioritized loyalty over capability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nowhere is this more critical than in the military. A military planning to defy the commander-in-chief’s lawful orders would no longer be acting in the nation’s best interest. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaving these operatives in place is a risk to Trump&#8217;s leadership. Passive and/or active resistance to policy changes can undermine the goals of the administration. But more importantly, a rebellious military can lead to a lack of action or inappropriate action when the U.S. is under threat. Yes, this must be dealt with now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/08/politics/pentagon-officials-discussing-trump/index.html">https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/08/politics/pentagon-officials-discussing-trump/index.html</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/the-rise-wokeness-the-military">https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/the-rise-wokeness-the-military</a></p>

Trump Must Fire the Deep State in the Military
