Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Trump is right to oppose the Senate immigration bill

&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">While the anti-Trump media obsesses with their political narratives – in this case that Trump and Republicans want to defeat the Senate immigration bill so that the crisis goes on as a campaign issue favorable to the GOP&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The Democrats’ narrative is designed to further demonize Trump and distract from the really important question&period; &nbsp&semi;Is the bipartisan bill produced in the Senate a good piece of legislation&quest;&nbsp&semi; Will it resolve or mitigate the expanding crisis at the border that has now metastasized throughout the nation in terms of drug deaths&comma; crime and overburdening social welfare systems and infrastructure&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The Senate legislation appears to be a non-start&period; &nbsp&semi;It becoming law is unlikely&period; &nbsp&semi;The odds at the moment are against passage in the Senate &&num;8212&semi; with those on both the right and the left expressing opposition&period;&nbsp&semi; Speaker Johnson says it is dead on arrival in the House&period;&nbsp&semi; That is a lot of opposition to overcome&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">In anticipation of the Senate legislation&comma; supporters were declaring it to be the strongest immigration bill in American history and best possible bill achievable&period;&nbsp&semi; The first claim is factually untrue&period; The House actually passed HR2 and sent it to the Senate a year and a half ago – and Majority Leader Schumer buried it&period;&nbsp&semi; It was far stronger than the Senate bill&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">With regard to the best bill achievable&period;&nbsp&semi; I suppose that could be true&comma; but that does not mean it should be &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;achieved&period;”&nbsp&semi; The Senate version has many of the same provisions as the HR2&comma; but the Senate’s key provisions for controlling the number of folks crossing the border illegally do not resolve the crisis&period;&nbsp&semi; It enshrines the problem into law&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">According to the Senate Bill&comma; Homeland Security MAY shut the border if 4000 or more migrants cross for 7 days in a row&period;&nbsp&semi; Note&colon; That is a &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;may&period;”&nbsp&semi; Do you believe the Biden administration would close the border if they were not required to do so by law&quest;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; Oh&excl;&nbsp&semi; We know the answer to that&period;&nbsp&semi; We have a law that makes crossing the border outside of entry points a felony –and we all know how well that law is being enforced&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The Senate bill does require closing of the border if 5000 or more migrants cross in a consecutive 7-day period&period;&nbsp&semi; That provision uses the mandatory word &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;shall&period;” &nbsp&semi;The Senate Bill also requires the border to be closed if 8500 or more migrants cross in a single day&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">So&comma; how will the Biden administration shut the border it has to do so&quest;&nbsp&semi; According to the Senate Bill&comma; there are several actions that would be taken&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<ol class&equals;"wp-block-list">&NewLine;<li>The Department of Homeland security would cease to process asylum claims at the border – except &lpar;get ready&rpar; except for those eligible for humanitarian parole or have a so-called &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;credible” fear of persecution or torture&period;&nbsp&semi; That does not look&comma; sound or smell like a shutdown&comma; but maybe a temporary slowdown&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The DHS would stop issuing visas and other immigration benefits to applicants who are still in Mexico or Canada – unless they qualify for an exception &lpar;another exception&rpar; or waiver&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The DHS would &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;expedite” the deportation of migrants apprehended at or near the border without a hearing – unless &lpar;here we go again&rpar; they express a fear of returning or have a valid claim to U&period;S&period; citizenship&period;&nbsp&semi; &lpar;Hmm&period;&nbsp&semi; How many illegal border crossers have a valid claim to U&period;S&period; citizenship&quest;&rpar;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The DHS would deploy additional personnel&comma; technology and infrastructure to secure the border and deter illegal crossings &lpar;except the ones they allow&period;&rpar;<&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ol>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The devil may be in the details&comma; but none of those Senate provisions come close to the claim of closing down the border even when the prescribed limits are reached&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">And if they do implement the aforementioned provisions when the limits are crossed&comma; how long does the border stay closed&quest;&nbsp&semi; A so-called border shutdown would last until the number of illegal crossings falls below the 5&comma;000 limit for 14 consecutive days&period;&nbsp&semi; WHOA&excl;&nbsp&semi; The border crossing would have to run below the 5&comma;000 limit for 14 days before the border can be re-opened&period;&nbsp&semi; So&comma; we could have 4&comma;999 migrants illegally crossing the border for 14 days while it is closed – and that would justify re-opening the border&quest;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">It is not clear how long the border would be somewhat closed in the case of a one-day 8&comma;500 surge&period; And in that case would the border only be closed the next day if another 8&comma;500 crossed&period;&nbsp&semi; And if 8&comma;500 crossed in one day&comma; could up to 5&comma;000 cross the next day&quest;&nbsp&semi; More devil in the details&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">What can be said&comma; however&comma; is that the limits in the Senate Bill are ridiculously high and the claim of shutting the border is &&num;8230&semi; well &&num;8230&semi; bullsh&ast;t&period;&nbsp&semi; The Senate Bill does not solve or mitigate the border crisis&comma; it merely locks it in at crisis level numbers&period;&nbsp&semi; Remember&comma; it was President Obama’s head of Homeland security who said that 1000 illegal border crosses per day is a crisis&period; And the Senator thinks 5&comma;000 or 8&comma;500 is a SOLUTION to the crisis&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Forget about the rest of the Bill – even popular and common-sense provisions&period;&nbsp&semi; Forget about the left’s anti-Trump narrative&period; These numbers would turn a crisis into a permanent on-going disaster&period;&nbsp&semi; They are consistent with Biden’s and the Democrats’ open border policies&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Yes&comma; it is a pity that Congress missed another opportunity to pass meaningful immigration reform&comma; but that is no reason to pass a bad bill&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version