Trans Woman Charged For Exposing “Himself” in Girl’s Locker Room
An Ohio transsexual who identifies as a “woman” has been charged with indecent exposure after allegedly brandishing his manhood in a women’s locker room with girls present!
The man who was masquerading as a woman in a YMCA women’s locker room has been charged with indecent exposure, signaling a possible prioritization of common sense over ideology.
Local TV station WHIO reported that complaints from real women at the YMCA center in Xenia began to pile up, accusing 31-year-old Darren Glines of various improprieties, but virtually all on the same theme.
The complaints, which go back to 2021, were filed by people who “reported seeing a naked male in the female’s locker room,” with three little girls present in one instance!
Xenia City Council President William Urschel echoed one of the complaints in a recent Green County Tea Party meeting that one woman who complained “went to the front desk and said, ‘Hey, I don’t know if you know what’s going on, but there’s a naked man in there.'”
Urschel suggested that the woman had been told in response, “‘No, this is actually a woman and … you shouldn’t be disturbed by this.'”
Greene County mother told another local affiliate, WLWT, that she was “upset” and “shaken” after Glines, of Fairborn, allegedly exposed himself to her and her 13-year-old and 16-year-old daughters.
Despite brandishing at least one piece of rather obvious evidence to the contrary, Glines allegedly told the concerned mother he was, in fact, a woman.
The mother reportedly found no help from the director of the YMCA, who indicated Glines and men like him couldn’t be stopped from entering women’s spaces.
The YMCA of Greater Dayton doubled down in support of male members in women’s locker rooms, writing in a recent statement, “Under no circumstance will we investigate an individual’s birth identity and then assign individuals to locker rooms. That would be counter to the law, counter to respect for all people, and it is not who or what we are as an organization.”
The organization told WLWT that the “Greater Dayton YMCA adheres to Ohio and Federal laws and antidiscrimination laws which allow all members access to its facilities and programs, regardless of religion, national origin, race, color, sex, age, disability, gender identity, or sexual orientation.”
Local resident and real woman Kim Coates told WHIO, “I’m not judging nobody, that’s not my business, but that’s a family place. … It doesn’t make me feel comfortable or at a safe place.”
Despite the Y’s lenient attitude towards Glines letting it all hang out in the lady’s locker room, The Journal-News reported that Glines, who calls himself Rachel, was charged in Xenia Municipal Court with three counts of public indecency for exposing himself in September, November, and on a third occasion with kids present, all fourth-degree misdemeanor charges.
City Council President Urschel, affiliated with the Republican Party, indicated that if the city is successful in prosecuting Glines, it may bring legal action against the YMCA for aiding and abetting the alleged crimes.
Of course, Democrats take a different view of Glines indecent acts.
Democrats lashed out at Urschel after he appeared to suggest that women and girls shouldn’t be subjected to indecencies to sate the ideological ambitions of social constructivists.
Kim McCarthy, chair of the Greene County Democratic Party, called Urschel’s stance “extremely disappointing,” suggesting that he should turn his focus elsewhere.
Trans “women” ARE NOT women! They are simply men disguised externally to resemble women but they are still men.
Sanity should prevail. The fat slob needs mental health and he should especially be kept out of places where young females should be able to feel safe.
You are 100% correct. Gender is determined by chromosomes. A person’s chromosomes cannot be altered. XX=female, XY=male. End of story.
Richard, perhaps the bard can help. From The Merchant of Venice: “Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions; fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer as a Christian is? If you prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And if you wrong us shall we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that. If a Jew wrong a Christian, what is his humility? Revenge. If a Christian wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be by Christian example? Why, revenge. The villainy you teach me I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction.”
Amazing how we must parse humans into the smallest of definitional buckets so we can treat the minority that the ” villainy you teach me I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction.” At some point we have to admit we are all humans and equal as such under the laws of man and God.
Frank: How misguided you are to think your “prose” has anything to do with men claiming to be women so they can expose themselves to real women,. And the head of the Democrat party exposes his and your lack of instruction on what and who God created.
I don’t give a DAMN how that sucker is dressed, If he still has his DICK HE IS NOT A WOMAN.. When and IF HE has that bitch cut off then he can become a SHE… then maybe it will sit down and shut the FUCK UP
Frank, how does your prose fit into protecting children?
When a person tries to change their sex, by surgery etc., they are spitting in the face of God who created man and woman. They are a sick group of people who need attention and they think this will get them some, good or bad attention they don’t care. Whatever God creates in the mothers womb, via man and woman, is what is to be, not open for change.
Where do you draw that line LJ: at gender? Maybe any plastic surgery? Or maybe all medicine — after all, cancer might be ordained by God…… I think it’s people who sport fake orange hair changing what God has created is what is to be, not open for change. What hath God created that you CAN touch? Why is gender and pregnancy where you folks draw the line?
Look folks, if the guy is a perv who does not believe he’s a she, throw the book at him. But if he truly wants to be a woman, has stated his intentions, is making all accommodations to prove that point, no self-righteous piece of shit should stand in it’s way. Let people be people, let it be. If we could just drop the labels, dismiss our fears and hatreds, quit the persecution of those different or special, and let people be, the world would be a better place.
You don’t find many trans people doing what you all think they do. They ain’t grooming at drag shows, they ain’t sending your kids to sexual hell at a library reading, and they aren’t often whipping it out at the Y or anywhere else. You’re living your fear, not facts. There is no way all the rapes in the US are trans-caused. Too many rapes, not enough trans. A large percentage of rapes are by known assailant’s, not a trans stranger. It’s much more likely that a trans gets assaulted that a trans would assault you.
But legally, all of that really does not matter.
Truth is part of this is on Ohio and part of this is on the Y and part of this, most of this, is on this person who is probably a sick perv, but should not be judged in by PBP, but in a court of law. YOU are not the court, and certainly you are not GOD.
Ohio’s “sexual identity” laws need work, basically it’s a grey area left to local jurisdictions to suss out and thus a hodgepodge of rules. The Y interpets these Ohio laws, and other places, as requiring them to allow gender self-identification, thus this person said: “I am woman, let me dress.” Thus far, it is LEGAL. Then, when it whips it out, only then he potentially becomes illegal.
Now they will first have to determine if it meant it or it he was lying —– NOT what GOD may or may not have intended. Man’s law, not GOD’s. Ohio’s law to be exact. Only then can they legally determine if it broke the law.
To go your way, Ohio will need stronger laws that the Y will have to follow to force those with extra flesh in that area (basically performing the same human functions) can use the women’s facilities. However, in this case, it may come down to his self-identification and whether it was truthful or he is a liar, a perv, and should be locked up. Very good chance he lied given there’s no much evidence to the contrary.
The Y has not changed it’s policy of self-identification.
Frank, you either do not have children, or did not quite get the message.
No one wants to deny someone their rights as a person. Not sure what religion has to do with this, but
a grown woman does not want a MANS penis were her daughter can see it. Period.
If a Penis was sitting on a table, the mother would not let her daughter look at it.
It does not even need to be attached. For that matter if a Woman had a Penis attached and used the woman’s locker room,
would that be OK? After all she is identifying as a male. The persons sexual orientation has nothing to do with it.
NO PENISES IN THE WOMAN,S LOCKER ROOM PERIOD. If he feels to be a woman, than get it removed!
I did not get the message, was reacting to the Dick’s bogus response. My bad.
I am just so tired of categorizing, classifying, distinguishing, and determining difference that change our equality. He’s gay, she’s a lesbian, he’s black, she’s muslim —————- I DONT GIVE A FUCK your race, religion, creed, class, whatever —- everyone is equal under man’s law and God’s law.
How often do we describe someone as “black.” Hardly ever use the word white as a description, but we use black often. Why? What are we trying to say. Well, it’s just an easy descriptor? Really, easier than white? OR off-white…..
Maybe no one should change in front of anyone. Or like many places, unisex locker rooms and bathrooms exist. Maybe if we treated it like it didn’t matter, it wouldn’t matter anymore.
This transgender nonsense can be, AND IS being, used by pedophiles and other disturbed and dangerous men to get access to areas that used to be private. And then LEGALLY (?) exposing themselves to woman and young girls. And we’re told to shut up and take it?
Are women supposed to give up their privacy and safety for a few individuals? I THINK NOT!
Heaven help the individual who eventually molests a woman or child. It will not end well.
This is NOT a threat – it’s a prediction.
And – I’m done with the Y.
Shame on THEM
Have a dick? You’re a guy. Stay the hell out of women’s bathrooms