Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Time to Give Up on a Negotiated Peace Agreement with Russia

&NewLine;<p>For more than two years&comma; Western leaders have clung to the hope that the Madman of Moscow&comma; Vladimir Putin&comma; might eventually accept a negotiated peace in Ukraine&period; That hope has now been shattered—again&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Putin’s latest rejection of peace proposals supported by the United States&comma; NATO&comma; and the European Union is not a surprise to anyone who has paid attention to his long record of duplicity&period; What it <em>does<&sol;em> make clear is that the West’s strategy of endless diplomacy must change&period; The time for half‑measures&comma; polite diplomatic overtures&comma; and wishful thinking is over&period; It is time to shift from pursuing peace through a negotiated settlement to a peace-through-victory strategy&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Putin has never been interested in peace&period; His long-term strategy is &&num;8212&semi; and has been &&num;8212&semi; conquest&comma; domination&comma; and a restoration of the old Soviet sphere of influence&period; Every ceasefire he has agreed to in the past—Georgia&comma; Crimea&comma; Donbas—has been nothing more than a tactical pause&period; He uses negotiations the way a pickpocket uses conversation &&num;8212&semi; as a diversion while he reaches for your wallet&period; The idea that Putin would suddenly embrace diplomacy now – and relinquish his dreams of an empire – is ludicrous&period;&nbsp&semi; He still believes he can outlast Western resolve – and why not&period;&nbsp&semi; He has been successful so far&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The Western world is at another &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Munich Moment&period;”&nbsp&semi; Will we again mistake appeasement for peace&quest;&nbsp&semi; Americans who support Ukraine do so not engage in naïve idealism or a belief that isolationism is the road to peace&comma; security and prosperity&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; It is predicated on a hard‑headed understanding of Putin &&num;8212&semi; that he will not stop with a portion of Ukraine&period; He will be emboldened&period; And the cost of stopping him later will be far higher&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The argument for total financial and military support for Ukraine at this moment is not about charity&period; It is about strategic necessity&period; Ukraine is fighting the war that NATO would otherwise have to fight&period; Every Russian tank destroyed in Donetsk is one less tank that could threaten Warsaw or Vilnius&period; Every drone shot down over Kyiv is one less drone that could be aimed at a NATO supply depot in the future&period; Supporting Ukraine is not a gift—it is an investment in Western security&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>It is time for the world democracies to do &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;whatever it takes” to defeat Putin &&num;8212&semi; and that includes measures that many Western governments have been reluctant to consider&period; But reluctance is a luxury that disappears when the stakes are existential&period; Maximum sanctions should not be a slogan&period;&nbsp&semi; They must be the enacted policies&period; Russia’s economy still enjoys too many loopholes&comma; too many backdoor channels&comma; too many friendly intermediaries&period; Those must be closed&period; The West has the economic power to crush Putin’s war machine—if it has the will&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Then there is the matter of seizing Russian assets&period; Hundreds of billions of dollars in frozen Russian funds sit in Western banks&period; Those assets should be seized and used to pay for Ukrainian defense and future reconstruction&period; &nbsp&semi;It is a small price to pay for the deaths and destruction resulting from Putin’s dirty little war&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>While Western leaders fear escalation&comma; the reality is that Putin has already escalated repeatedly&period; The West’s fear of provoking him has not prevented him from bombing civilians&comma; weaponizing energy supplies&comma; or threatening nuclear blackmail&period; A more assertive posture—such as enforcing limited no‑fly zones&comma; targeting Russian military assets outside Ukraine that directly support the invasion&comma; or providing Ukraine with long‑range capabilities—could shift the balance without triggering the apocalyptic scenarios Putin threatens&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Enough is enough” captures a sentiment that is spreading across the political spectrum&period; Putin has made his intentions clear&period; He will not stop unless he is stopped&period; And Ukraine cannot stop him without the full backing of the free world&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>A strategy aimed at Putin’s defeat is not reckless&period; It is realistic&period; It recognizes that peace cannot be negotiated with a man who sees aggression as a national policy&period; &nbsp&semi;It recognizes that strength and resolve&comma; not accommodation and appeasement&comma; are what deters aggression&period; And it recognizes that the cost of inaction today is much higher than the cost of necessary action tomorrow&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>If the West truly believes in sovereignty&comma; freedom&comma; and the rule of law&comma; then now is the moment to prove it&period; Ukraine is fighting for its survival&period; The West must decide whether it will fight for its democratic principles&period;&nbsp&semi; Its security&period;&nbsp&semi; Its world leadership&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version