Site icon The Punching Bag Post

The passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

<p>In mid-July&comma; Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was facing yet another round of cancer – this time pancreatic cancer&period;  She had beaten cancer on a number of previous occasions – making her what I described as &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;one tough old gal&period;”  But even a tough gal cannot always beat the odds&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Ginsburg was an intellectual powerhouse that could express her liberal views persuasively&comma; but without rancor&period;  It was a testimony to her character that her closest friend on the Supreme Court was arguably the most conservative member&comma; Justice Antonin Scalia&period;  He was the perfect counterpart to Ginsburg – an intellectual powerhouse&comma; but without rancor&period;  The high court had no better representative of the liberal viewpoint than Ginsburg&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Ginsburg was also the celebrity of the Court&period;  She was deemed to be the Court’s rock star – appearing in documentaries and on the covers of innumerable magazines&period;  Young people wore RBG t-shirts&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>On September 18&comma; 2020&comma; Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a historic figure&period;  The book of her attributes and achievements closed – left for future generations to remember and historians to interpret&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Ginsburg’s passing came as a surprise to much of the public&period;  That is largely due to the fact that her terminal illness was not reported&period;  Make no mistake&period;  The so-called insiders were well aware that she was in the last stages of pancreatic cancer&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Perhaps the reluctance to report on her expected demise was out of a hope that she would survive past Inauguration Day 2021 – and that former Vice President Biden would be given the responsibility to select a successor&period;  In her own postmortem statement&comma; Ginsburg&comma; herself&comma; expressed her wish that her successor would be selected by the winner of the 2020 presidential election&period;  There was no mistaking who she hoped that would be&period;  She had previously stated that she did not want Trump to nominate her replacement&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>With all the grit and determination in her frail body&comma; she could not make herself survive long enough to take the chance that it would be Biden – and not Trump – taking the oath of office in January&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>On July 20<sup>th<&sol;sup>&comma; I wrote a commentary addressing Ginsburg’s announcement of renewed cancer &&num;8212&semi;  and said &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote; … <em>the entire nation wishes her a quick and speedy recovery – even though that is not a likely outcome&period;  At 87&period; Ginsburg is on the precipice of eternity&period;  Everyone knows that&period;”<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>I further wrote&colon;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><em>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Given her age and condition&comma; most justices would step aside&period;  The reason that she does not is the talk of the town — but only whispered in the cloistered rooms of political power&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><em>Her desire to maintain her seat on the Supreme Court is driven by one overriding fear – that President Trump would name her successor and win approval in the Republican Senate&period;  That same fear has the left totally apoplectic&period;”<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>That moment has come&period;  Her death comes at a time when mourning will quickly give way to the political machinations&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As I predicted in that July 20 commentary&period;  Her death in the last days of a Trump administration would set off political wrangling unseen in our lifetimes&period;  The confirmations of Justice Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh will seem like a love-in compared to what lies ahead&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Gorsuch and Kavanaugh replaced members of the Supreme Court who were not dramatically different than themselves&period;  The Court remained evenly divided with Chief Justice John Roberts assuming the swing vote position&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>There will be a clamor from the left to keep the seat open for the next President&period;  They will cite the largely irrelevant &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Biden Rule” against nominating a candidate in a presidential election year&period;  It was not really a &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;rule&comma;” but just a pragmatic political strategy-of-convenience depending on the circumstances of the moment&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Senate Leader Mitch McConnell seemed to invoke the Rule when he blocked the confirmation of Merritt Garland in the last days of the Obama administration&period;  Of course&comma; the Rule was only an excuse&period;  What McConnell did was use his Republican majority and the rules of the Senate – his constitutional powers &&num;8212&semi; to postpone the confirmation in the hope that Trump would win the 2016 election&period;  It was a longshot gambit that paid off&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>You can bet the ranch that the Biden Rule will not be invoked this time&period;  Knowing that Ginsburg was terminally ill&comma; Trump is ready to name his nominee – after a very short period of respectful mourning&period;  Trump has published his list of candidates for the high court – and there is not a liberal on the list&period;  This means that Ginsburg is likely to be replaced by a conservative justice – leaning the court to a conservative constitutionalist majority for potentially years to come&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>McConnell – for his part &&num;8212&semi; will commence hearings before the election&period;  The odds – based on the rules of the Senate – is that confirmation will likely happen sometime before Inauguration Day&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>There will be a LOT of caterwauling&comma; but McConnell has all the constitutional powers on his side – as long as he has the vote&period;  Win or lose the election&comma; Trump will have impacted on the Supreme Court more than any President since Franklin Roosevelt – and FDR needed three terms to do it&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Apart from the hysterical cries from Democrats – and the hyper-dramatic reporting of the left-wing news outlets – there is another reaction about which to be concerned&period;  And that is the reaction of the mobs that are already poised for violent protest in the streets&period;  This could be just another excuse to renew the burning&comma; looting and vandalism&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Hang on to your hats because our political ride is about to get wild and scarier than ever&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version