<p>The NY Times has reported the existence of a 2nd whistleblower, who will supposedly corroborate the story of the first one.</p>
<p>As with the first whistleblower, at this early stage we only know the existence of this official and that they &#8220;have first hand evidence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Inspector general of the Intelligence Community, Michael Atkinson has apparently met with the whistleblower and &#8220;substantiated his account.&#8221; The whistleblower may or may not file a report.</p>
<p><strong>Authors commentary:</strong> The NY Times has taken this occasion to provide a highly speculative development, but writing an entire article about what might be revealed and how it might affect the President. This is propaganda at its best.</p>
<p>If you recall, the story of the first whistleblower was headlines for 3 days before we had any details at all. (We didn&#8217;t even know &#8220;Ukraine&#8221; for that long).</p>
<p><strong>Extra:</strong> I believe I have made some headway into the whole attack pattern on President Trump. Watch for tomorrows column for the first of a two part article.</p>