The NY Times has reported the existence of a 2nd whistleblower, who will supposedly corroborate the story of the first one.
As with the first whistleblower, at this early stage we only know the existence of this official and that they “have first hand evidence.”
Inspector general of the Intelligence Community, Michael Atkinson has apparently met with the whistleblower and “substantiated his account.” The whistleblower may or may not file a report.
Authors commentary: The NY Times has taken this occasion to provide a highly speculative development, but writing an entire article about what might be revealed and how it might affect the President. This is propaganda at its best.
If you recall, the story of the first whistleblower was headlines for 3 days before we had any details at all. (We didn’t even know “Ukraine” for that long).
Extra: I believe I have made some headway into the whole attack pattern on President Trump. Watch for tomorrows column for the first of a two part article.