Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Supreme Court ruled correctly on bump stocks … even though they should be banned

&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">The issue of bump stocks is very simple&period;  It is illegal to own a fully automatic gun – a gun that releases a full magazine with one pull on the trigger&period;  With a semi-automatic weapon&comma; each bullet requires a separate pull on the trigger&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">As we have tragically seen too many times&comma; semi-automatic guns can fire a lot of rounds in a very short time – but not nearly as many as one equipped with a bump stock&period;  It turns a legal semi-automatic weapon into an illegal fully automatic weapon&period;   That should be illegal – and that should be obvious despite technical differences and legalese&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Recently –and to the consternation from anti-gun folks – the Supreme Court declared that President Trump’s action to make bump stocks illegal was unconstitutional&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi; Even though they should be illegal in my judgment&comma; the Supreme Court decision was the correct one&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Making bump stocks illegal is the role of the Congress – with the role of the President to either sign or veto the legislation&period;&nbsp&semi; An executive order from the President is a usurpation of the powers of Congress&period;&nbsp&semi; It is an authoritarian act&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">One of the essential roles of the Supreme Court is to maintain the critical balance of power between the three branches of government – AND&comma; incidentally&comma; to prevent bureaucratic abuses of power through excessive and inappropriate rulemaking &lpar;legislating&rpar;&period;&nbsp&semi; &lpar;Actually&comma; the Supreme Court is considering a case dealing with bureaucratic regulatory abuse&period;&nbsp&semi; But that is for another commentary &&num;8230&semi; and I digress&period;&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Ironically&comma; President Biden claims to be a defender of democracy despite the fact that he is among the greatest users – abusers &&num;8212&semi; of authoritarian executive orders to improperly assume legislative powers&period;&nbsp&semi; In fact&comma; he often admits that he uses executive orders when Congress does not pass the laws he wants&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">Lack of action by Congress is not a green light for the President to enact laws by edict&period;   The Supreme Court is doing its job when it defends the role of Congress&period;  Unfortunately&comma; it is not doing it enough&period;  Bump stocks should be outlawed – BUT it is up to Congress to do it&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p class&equals;"wp-block-paragraph">So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version