Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Secret Clinton Tarmac Meeting was Planned – Lynch Used an Alias to Write About It

<p class&equals;"MsoNormal" style&equals;"text-align&colon; left&semi;" align&equals;"center">The former attorney general Loretta Lynch went to great lengths to hide what was said at the suspicious tarmac meeting with the former President Bill Clinton&period; <span style&equals;"mso-spacerun&colon; yes&semi;">&nbsp&semi;<&sol;span><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">The former FBI director&comma; James Comey had said multiple times that she would not reveal the reason for the meeting&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Then it was just confirmed earlier this week that Lynch used a work alias &ldquo&semi;Elizabeth Carlisle&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">413 of the Department of Justice documents provided to the conservative watchdog groups Judicial Watch and the American Center for Law and Justice&period; Both had filed multiple Freedom of Information Act requests to get a hold of the documents&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">So why the use of an alias&quest; It&rsquo&semi;s not uncommon for officials to use a work alias&comma; especially when they want their emails to be less detectable&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">In June of 2016&comma; a reporter in Phoenix reached out to the Justice Department about the infamous tarmac meeting between former president Bill Clinton and Lynch&period; Lynch was supposed to be overseeing the federal investigation into Hillary Clinton&rsquo&semi;s use of her private email server&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;The infamous tarmac meeting between President Clinton and AG Lynch is a vivid example of why many Americans believe the Obama administration&rsquo&semi;s criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton was rigged&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Tom&nbsp&semi;Fitton&comma; Judicial Watch president in March of 2017&period; &ldquo&semi;Now it will be up to Attorney General Sessions at the Trump Justice Department to finally shed some light on this subversion of justice&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">The documents reveal that Lynch used the Elizabeth Carlisle alias to address the tarmac meeting&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;Internal DOJ emails show that the request touched off a mad-dash to develop talking points and statements to respond to the developing story&comma;&rdquo&semi; writes <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">The Daily Caller&period;<&sol;em> &ldquo&semi;Lynch&comma; using the Elizabeth Carlisle account&comma; which was hosted on the Justice Department&rsquo&semi;s system&comma; was also involved in those discussions&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Lynch has said that Hillary Clinton&rsquo&semi;s email investigation was not a topic of discussion at the &ldquo&semi;coincidental&rdquo&semi; meeting&period; But according the reporter who witnessed the meeting&comma; the 30-minute meeting was in fact planned&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;She&comma; as a matter of fact&comma; landed on time&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Christopher Sign&comma; the <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">KNXV-TV<&sol;em> anchor who broke the story on <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">Fox News&rsquo&semi; The O&rsquo&semi;Reilly Factor&period;<&sol;em> &ldquo&semi;&lbrack;Mr&period; Clinton&rsqb; and his entourage were running late according to my sources&period; They then make the decision &mdash&semi; &lsquo&semi;they&rsquo&semi; meaning the former president&rsquo&semi;s team &mdash&semi; they wait for her to land&period; She arrives&period; Some people step off of her plane&period; The former president steps into her plane&period; They then speak for 30 minutes &mdash&semi; privately&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Lynch&rsquo&semi;s attorney also defended the use of the alias&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;That address was and is known to the individuals who process &lbrack;Freedom of Information Act&rsqb; requests&semi; the practice&comma; similar to using initials or numbers in an email&comma; helps guard against security risks and prevent inundation of mailboxes&comma;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;said Robert Raben&comma; Lynch&rsquo&semi;s attorney to <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">The Daily Caller&period; <&sol;em>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">After the DOJ documents were released&comma; the Carlisle emails were quickly discovered by Reddit users&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Other Obama administration officials&rsquo&semi; aliases were revealed too&comma; like Lois Lerner&comma; the former IRS official had the alias &ldquo&semi;Toby Miles&rdquo&semi; and Eric Holder&comma; the former attorney general had the alias &ldquo&semi;Lew Alcindor&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal"><strong>Author&rsquo&semi;s note&colon; <&sol;strong>Why use an alias&quest; She obviously had something to hide&period; Maybe she even exposed classified information with this account&quest; That&rsquo&semi;s why it&rsquo&semi;s important for groups like Judicial Watch to get these documents out for the public to investigate&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal"><strong>Editor&&num;8217&semi;s note<&sol;strong>&colon; I question both the integrity and the suitability of Lynch in the role of Attorney General&period;&nbsp&semi;Lynch abandoned her post when it came to indicting Hillary Clinton&comma; leaving it instead in the hands of her subordinate FBI Director James Comey&period; If she wanted to exonerate Clinton she should have done it herself&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">By the way&comma; using a &&num;8220&semi;work alias&&num;8221&semi; is not a secure means of communicating and certainly not suitable for transmitting classified information&comma; or other sensitive information that foreign government might use as blackmail material &lpar;like this meeting&rpar;&period; It may fool some unsophisticated competitors&comma; but it will never fool professional intelligence officers&comma; whose job it is to nail you to the wall&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version