Site icon The Punching Bag Post

SCOTUS Upholds Lower Court's Ruling on North Carolina Voter ID Law

<p>There has been much talk of voter fraud surrounding the recent presidential election&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by millions&comma; but President Trump insists that he would have won had it not been for widespread voter fraud&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>This Monday&comma; the Supreme Court rejected an appeal to reestablish a controversial voter identification law in North Carolina&period; This leaves in place a federal appeals court ruling that removed key parts of the law including its voter ID requirements&comma; an elimination of same-day registration&comma; a rollback of early voting to 10 days from 17&comma; and its ban on counting votes cast in the wrong precinct&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Last summer&comma; the 4th US Circuit argued that North Carolina&&num;8217&semi;s law &ldquo&semi;disproportionately affected African-Americans&period;&rdquo&semi; For example&comma; the voter ID provision &ldquo&semi;retained only those types of photo ID disproportionately held by whites and excluded those disproportionately held by African-Americans&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The court concluded that the law was enacted &ldquo&semi;with discriminatory intent&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The situation is similar to the court fight in Texas&comma; where a voter ID law was&nbsp&semi;struck down as racially discriminatory&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Voter ID laws in North Carolina and Texas were established following the Supreme Court&&num;8217&semi;s 2013 decision to scrap a provision of the federal&nbsp&semi;<em>Voting Rights Act<&sol;em>&nbsp&semi;&&num;8211&semi; a move that significantly weakened federal oversight of voting rights legislation&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Dems argue that voter ID laws are a form of voter suppression that make it harder for minority groups to cast ballots&comma; and the new laws&nbsp&semi;were immediately challenged by the Obama Administration&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>North Carolina Republicans rightly argue that voter ID laws are a necessary requirement to ensure the integrity of our elections&comma; but had no evidence of voter fraud to present to the court&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Earlier this month&comma; President Trump announced the creation of a bipartisan commission that will be tasked with investigating voter fraud and determining the scale of it during the 2016 election&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The commission may be in a position to provide evidence of voter fraud that North Carolina and other states can use to ensure the passage of vital voter identification laws&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;All North Carolinians can rest assured that Republican legislators will continue fighting to protect the integrity of our elections by implementing the commonsense requirement to show a photo ID when we vote&comma;&&num;8221&semi; promises North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>Author&&num;8217&semi;s Note&colon;<&sol;strong>&nbsp&semi;According to the National Conference of State Legislatures&comma; 32 states already have some kind of voter ID law in place&period; With congressional majority&comma; now may be the chance for the GOP to take another crack at voter ID requirements and other election changes&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>Editor&&num;8217&semi;s Note&colon;<&sol;strong> The Supreme Court really rejected this on a technicality&period; More to come&&num;8230&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version