Site icon The Punching Bag Post

SCOTUS Approves Travel Ban; Trump Strikes out Obama-era Visa Rule

<p>Last week&comma; President Trump signed an executive order that cancels a 2012 rule requiring the State Department to interview 80&percnt; of nonimmigrant visa applicants within three weeks of receipt of application&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;The president expects careful&comma; accurate vetting of visa applicants&comma; not a rushed process to accommodate an arbitrary deadline&comma;&rdquo&semi; said White House spokesman Michael Short&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The executive order directs the DHS and the State Department to design a new implementation plan for visa processing&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>So far&comma; the State Department has asked officials to increase screening for visa applicants by identifying &ldquo&semi;populations warranting increased scrutiny&rdquo&semi; and is requiring social media checks for anyone who has recently been to ISIS-controlled area of Syria and Iraq&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;&lbrack;The order&rsqb; is just one aspect of a much larger playbook now underway&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Stewart Verdery&comma; who worked for the DHS during the Bush Administration&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&&num;8212&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Improving vetting procedures has been a central part of Trump&rsquo&semi;s promise to strengthen the fight against terrorism&comma; but his efforts to enact a travel ban have been stymied liberal courts&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Administration revealed a revised travel ban on March 6th&comma; but a US District Court Judge in Hawaii blocked it just hours before it was set to begin&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In early June&comma; Trump asked the Supreme Court to reinstate the travel ban while they prepare to hear the case&period; This week&comma; the court allowed much of the ban to be put into place&comma; excepting travelers with a &ldquo&semi;credible claim of bona fide relationship&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Travelers seeking to come to the US for professional reasons will also be allowed in the country &&num;8211&semi; if they can show a relationship that is &ldquo&semi;formal&comma; documented&comma; and formed in the ordinary course rather than for the purpose of evading&rdquo&semi; the travel ban&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Trump praised the Supreme Court&rsquo&semi;s decision as a &ldquo&semi;clear victory for our national security&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&ldquo&semi;Today&rsquo&semi;s ruling allows me to use an important tool for protecting our nation&rsquo&semi;s homeland&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Trump&period; &ldquo&semi; I am also particularly gratified that the Supreme Court&rsquo&semi;s decision was 9-0&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The executive order on visa processing will work in tandem with the travel ban&comma; which &ldquo&semi;mandates a worldwide review of vetting procedures and also prevents consulates from waiving visa interviews for repeat applicants&comma;&rdquo&semi; reports<em> The Hill&period;<&sol;em><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong>Author&rsquo&semi;s Note&colon;<&sol;strong> It was Trump&rsquo&semi;s intention to enact the travel ban abruptly so that terrorists would be locked out&comma; but the legal delays have prevented the surprise factor&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>At least now we&rsquo&semi;re getting a version of the ban&comma; and it is likely the Supreme Court will vindicate Trump when it hears the case in the fall&period;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version