Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Roger Stone is one very interesting character

&NewLine;<p>I had a modest association with Roger Stone when we both served in the White House during the Nixon administration&period;&nbsp&semi; I have followed his career for the next 50 years&period;&nbsp&semi; My original opinion of him never changed&period;&nbsp&semi; He has always been a bit of a nutcase&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Stone is the definition of dapper – although his impeccable style seems more in tune with the 1930s&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>He is a combination of a conspiratorial theorist – at least the spreader of conspiratorial theories – and a dirty trickster&period;&nbsp&semi; His greatest appeal seemed to be with the politically paranoid&period;&nbsp&semi; His appeal to a guy like Nixon was his intense loyalty&period;&nbsp&semi; He would do anything for the boss – even take a bullet&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The person most like Stone in the Nixon circle was J&period; Gordon Liddy – one of the guys who actually broke into the Watergate and unintentionally ended Nixon’s rather impressive and popular years in the Oval Office<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Stone was like a pretend CIA agent &&num;8212&semi; always in the know of deep dark secrets and empowered to do whatever was necessary to fix things&period;&nbsp&semi; While he did not claim a license to kill&comma; any illegal or unethical activity in pursuit of his mission was always open to consideration&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Even in his early career&comma; he was labeled as a political dirty-trickster by many in Washington – even members of Nixon’s staff&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>For Stone&comma; there has always been an enemy to be defeated&period;  He cast himself as the constant victim of political persecution&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Following the fall of Nixon&comma; Stone became more obscure in high-level political circles&period;&nbsp&semi; He went about his career and entered the b-level speaking circuit as are retrospective commentator on Nixon and the Watergate scandal&period;&nbsp&semi; He shared his insider information – a mix of fact&comma; embellishment&comma; and invention&period;&nbsp&semi; He wrote books – although not bestsellers&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Stone might have remained in semi-anonymity were it not for Donald Trump&period;&nbsp&semi; Somewhere along the line&comma; Trump took on Stone as an unofficial advisor&period;&nbsp&semi; There was an immediate sympatico between the two establishmentarians&period;&nbsp&semi; Both used dubious narratives to gain public attention and political support&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>It was not a political marriage&period; Stone would cycle in and out of Trump’s circle of advisors and confidants – as was Trump’s habit&period;&nbsp&semi; In fact&comma; Stone was more or less out of favor until the 2020 election&period;&nbsp&semi; Trump needed people to spread the word that the election was hijacked – just the sort of mission that would appeal to Stone&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Based on his history&comma; the efficacy of Trump’s claim would not be a consideration in Stone’s taking up the cause&period;&nbsp&semi; &nbsp&semi; Nor would Stone’s advocacy be limited by traditional norms or strict adherence to the law&period;&nbsp&semi; It was the narrative that counted&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Stone was once convicted of lying to fibbing to Congress about his involvement with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange&period;&nbsp&semi; Stone never served time because Trump commuted his 40-month prison sentence&period;&nbsp&semi; It was not a pardon – as many in the media report – but merely removing the sentence&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>However&comma; Stone may be in trouble again&period;  This time for his role in organizing elements of the January 6<sup>th<&sol;sup> protest&period;  Were his actions merely to stall the certification in order to get a recount&quest;  Or was he inciting violence to actually overthrow the election of Biden&quest;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Recently leaked recordings appear to have Stone calling for violence&period;&nbsp&semi; He says the recordings are doctored and out-of-context&period;&nbsp&semi; That cannot be settled in the court-of-public-opinion – as Stone’s enemies would like&period;&nbsp&semi; It seems likely&comma; however&comma; that Stone may have to prove his case in a court-of-law … again&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Stone is entitled to his presumption of innocence&period;&nbsp&semi; We will probably find out if that presumption holds up in court&period;&nbsp&semi; Will his case carry over to Trump&quest;&nbsp&semi; Probably not&period;&nbsp&semi; Most folks who know Stone the best say he will never flip&period;&nbsp&semi; He did not with Nixon – and will probably not with Trump&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The opinions of Stone vary widely&comma; but there can be universal agreement … he is one very interesting character&period;&nbsp&semi; Right out of a political movie thriller&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version