Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Pro-life is Neither Anti-birth Control … Nor Disregarding of the Newborn

&NewLine;<p>In an effort to undermine the specific pro-life position&comma; the pro-abortion community distracts into unrelated and irrelevant issues&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><strong>Birth control and contraception<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The first of these is to suggest that pro-lifers are against birth control through contraceptive methods that prevent the fertilization of the female egg cell&period;&nbsp&semi; In fact&comma; most pro-lifers are strongly supportive of methods that would prevent conception – the point when the new life has all the DNA attributes of a human being&period;&nbsp&semi; Virtually all the physical traits of the later person are already contained in the DNA&period;&nbsp&semi; That is the beginning of the development of a human being&period;&nbsp&semi; That is beyond refutation&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Birth control prevents the creation of a developing human being and negates any later consideration of abortion&period;&nbsp&semi; Birth control is a good thing – both in terms of technology and education&period;&nbsp&semi; Pro-lifers also believe in moral and abstinence education&period;&nbsp&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Yes … I know that certain religious groups have moral objections to contraception and the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;spilling of the seed&comma;” but those issues do not drive the pro-life&comma; anti-abortion folks – and they have virtually no impact on public policy&period;&nbsp&semi; I have yet to see even the most religious folks lobbying for legislation to ban masturbation or the use of condoms&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Preventing pregnancies precludes the later question of abortion&period;&nbsp&semi; Contraception is a pro-life position&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><strong>Heartless disregard for the newborn<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>This is one of the more heartless and nonsensical accusations leveled at pro-lifers – and egregiously wrong&period;&nbsp&semi; Basically&comma; the charge is that while pro-lifers want to save the life of the developing human being &lpar;true&rpar;&comma; they care nothing about what happens to the unwanted child after birth &lpar;false&rpar;&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Those who proffer that argument intimate – and even claim – that the child will have a profoundly unhappy life – subject to neglect and abuse&period;&nbsp&semi; He or she will suffer from a lack of resources – such as food and medical care – because of the impoverishment of the single mother&period;&nbsp&semi; For the pro-abortion folks&comma; the example is most often a single minority mother&period; &lpar;Talk about racist stereotyping&rpar;&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>The first problem with that malicious claim is that the vast majority of pro-life institutions provide adoption services for women who prefer to give up their child&period;&nbsp&semi; Often that decision is based on the mother’s belief that the child will have a &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;better life” with a different family – partially dispelling the contention that all those unaborted babies will live in misery – or turn out to be anti-social adults&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>I recall Jerry Falwell saying that pro-lifers are obligated to address the wellbeing of the newborn&period;&nbsp&semi; For his part&comma; he launched a major adoption program within his ministry&period;&nbsp&semi; Statistically&comma; pro-lifers – and conservatives in general – are the most likely to adopt&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Those who proffer the heartless pro-lifer propaganda fail to take into consideration that there is a network of the private sector and religious voluntary charitable support groups – food pantries&comma; and community daycare&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;It is no small irony that the critics who say the unaborted children will not have the support of pro-lifers and society&comma; in general&comma; seem to have forgotten about all the government programs at the federal&comma; state&comma; and municipal levels that provided direct and indirect support to children and families with children&period;&nbsp&semi; Such programs as an aid to dependent children&comma; school lunch programs&comma; school counselors&comma; SNAP &lpar;food stamps&rpar;&comma; rent assistance&comma; free clinics&comma; etc&period;&comma; etc&period;&comma; etc&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>America provides enormous support for children at risk – whether from government or private sector efforts AND is uniquely provided by the pro-life community&period;&nbsp&semi; To say that pro-lifers do not care about the unaborted babies – or do nothing to support them – is just another leftwing false propaganda narrative … period&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p><strong>Summary<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>Rather than waste time on irrelevant or phony issues&comma; we should concentrate on the central issue of abortion – and that is the determination of when the developing human being in the womb has the inalienable and constitutional right to life&period;&nbsp&semi; Everything else is political flak&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<p>So&comma; there &OpenCurlyQuote;tis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version