
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a move that has sent shockwaves through the Catholic world, Pope Leo XIV has wielded the ancient sword of excommunication against more than 30,000 members of the Society of Saint Pius X, or SSPX. Six bishops stand formally cast out, including Alfonso de Galarreta, Bernard Fellay, Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier. The charge? Disobedience to papal doctrine and authority. The SSPX maintains 115 chapels served by 124 priests, all now declared schismatic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One need not be a theologian to recognize this as something more than a simple enforcement of canon law. It reeks of an insider ecclesiastical game, a power struggle within the Vatican walls where traditionalist voices that cling to the pre-Vatican II Latin Mass and doctrinal rigor find themselves on the wrong side of the current regime. The SSPX dared to consecrate four new bishops without papal approval, defying direct warnings from Leo himself. In the eyes of Rome, this act of defiance constitutes schism, an automatic latae sententiae excommunication under church law. Yet one wonders why such swift and sweeping action targets conservatives who seek to preserve timeless rituals while other scandals fester with far less urgency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The practical consequences cut deep into the daily spiritual lives of the faithful. For those attached to the SSPX, sacraments hang in precarious balance. Marriages assisted by their priests may now be deemed invalid in the eyes of Rome. Confessions risk lacking proper absolution. Baptisms, while often considered valid due to form and intent, carry the shadow of illicit administration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The faithful who formally to SSPX face exclusion from full communion, barred from licit reception of the Eucharist and other rites that sustain the soul. It is akin to locking the family out of the ancestral home because they insisted on using grandmother’s cherished recipe for the Sunday roast. The Vatican warns that participation severs one from the Church’s sacramental life, a heavy penalty for those who view the SSPX as a bulwark against modernist dilutions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">History provides perspective, though not always comforting precedent. Popes have brandished excommunication like a spiritual club against kings and heretics alike. Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV endured multiple excommunications in the Investiture Controversy. Martin Luther received formal condemnation in 1521 for his disruptive teachings. Henry VIII of England faced the penalty when he shattered unity for personal convenience. Joan of Arc herself suffered it before later rehabilitation. These were often dramatic clashes over authority, doctrine, or temporal power. Yet the SSPX case stands out in its scale, sweeping thousands of laity into the net for mere formal adherence. It echoes the 1988 excommunications under John Paul II for similar unauthorized consecrations by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, later partially eased by Benedict XVI. Today’s action feels less like pastoral correction and more like a declaration of war on traditionalist holdouts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">From a staunch pro-life vantage, the hypocrisy screams louder than a foghorn in a silent monastery. The Church has long taught that abortion procures automatic excommunication for those directly involved. Yet Popes and bishops have displayed remarkable reluctance to apply the same rigor to Catholics who support, perform, or facilitate the killing of the unborn developing humans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Politicians such as President Joe Biden and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, self-proclaimed devout Catholics, have championed abortion rights with vigor, voting for expansive funding and legal protections while presenting themselves for Communion without apparent consequence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Where are the sweeping decrees against them? One searches in vain for mass excommunications targeting the vast network of Catholics serving in clinics, as funders, and political enablers. The contrast is stark: traditionalists preserving the old Mass face expulsion, while those enabling the modern holocaust of the innocent receive kid-glove treatment and photo opportunities at the Vatican.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This selective enforcement exposes a troubling double standard. The SSPX represents a tiny fraction of global Catholicism, clinging to orthodoxy amid perceived liturgical chaos. Abortion supporters, by contrast, wield real political power and influence policy that ends heartbeats by the thousands daily. If obedience to authority justifies such broad excommunications, why does it not extend to defiance of the Church’s clearest moral teachings on the sanctity of life?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the end, this episode underscores deeper fractures in the Church. Conservatives who value doctrinal clarity and sacred tradition find themselves marginalized, while progressive elements enjoy latitude. One prays for unity rooted in truth rather than power plays. The body of Christ deserves better than selective schism hunts. True reform begins with unwavering defense of the innocent and fidelity to the deposit of faith, not bureaucratic score-settling. May cooler heads, guided by eternal principles, prevail before more souls wander in confusion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, there ‘tis.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Footnote: For the record, I am not a member of the Catholic Church – but express my opinion as a secular commentator on contemporary issues.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>

Pope Leo Excommunicates Thousands of Clergy and Laity
