Site icon The Punching Bag Post

Obama-Era Uranium Deal Now Under Investigation

<p class&equals;"MsoNormal" style&equals;"text-align&colon; left&semi;" align&equals;"center">While some Democrats have been desperately trying to connect the Trump administration to Russia&comma; there suspiciously hasn&rsquo&semi;t been any investigation into the uranium deal struck with Russia during the Obama era&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">That was until now&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works and Senator&comma; John Barrasso is looking for answers and has requested documents from the U&period;S&period; Energy Department and U&period;S&period; Nuclear Regulatory Commission to give an explanation about the uranium deal&period; He has set a deadline of January 31 to receive the documents&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">The uranium deal gave Russian control of roughly 20&percnt; of the U&period;S&period; supply of uranium after the U&period;S&period; government agreed to sell Uranium One&comma; a Canadian mining company to Russia&rsquo&semi;s Rosatom nuclear company&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">What was extremely suspicious was how the uranium was exported out of the U&period;S&period; and how Barrasso was misled about this process&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&ldquo&semi;Beginning in 2012&comma; Uranium One exported U&period;S&period; uranium by &lsquo&semi;piggy-backing&rsquo&semi; as a supplier on an export license&comma;&rdquo&semi; said Barrasso&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">However&comma; the former NRC Chairman Gregory&nbsp&semi;Jaczko&nbsp&semi;told him that the companies did not obtain the specific &ldquo&semi;NRC export license&rdquo&semi; and would not be permitted to export the uranium from the U&period;S&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Except&comma; as reported by <em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">The Hill<&sol;em>&comma; memos show that the NRC did approve &ldquo&semi;the shipment of yellowcake uranium&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;from the U&period;S&period; to Canada via a third party carrier&period; Some of this material also went to Europe&period; Again&comma; the NRC license was never issued&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal"><em style&equals;"mso-bidi-font-style&colon; normal&semi;">The Hill <&sol;em>also said that the NCR could have covertly added an amendment to an existing export license where Uranium One was added &ldquo&semi;to the list of clients whose uranium it could move to Canada&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Allegedly&comma; it was the Department of Energy secretly approving exports&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&&num;8220&semi;Reporting by the Casper Star Tribune shows that&comma; upon receipt of my letter to President Obama&comma; the White House forwarded the letter to the DOE which then referred this matter to the NRC stating&colon; &lsquo&semi;Because the subject of the letter does not fall within the purview of the Department of Energy&comma; we are forwarding the letter to your agency&period;&rsquo&semi; By stating DOE had no role in the matter&comma; the DOE concealed the possibility of subsequent exports and their responsibility in reviewing them&comma;&rdquo&semi; wrote Barrasso in the letter&period; &ldquo&semi;The DOE&rsquo&semi;s concealment&comma; together with Chairman Jaczko&rsquo&semi;s deception&comma; created a false narrative that there was only one agency and one process by which Uranium One could export uranium&period;&rdquo&semi;&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Republicans have questioned this for years&comma; but this deal is finally being investigated after multiple mainstream media reports about how starting in 2009&comma; Russian operatives were bribing officials to expand Russia&rsquo&semi;s energy business in the U&period;S&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">The Clinton Foundation is at the center of the Uranium One controversy&period; Both Bill Clinton and the foundation received donations from several of the Uranium One&rsquo&semi;s owners&period; &nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">&dollar;145 million was given to the foundation&period; This fueled speculation that Hillary Clinton&comma; who was the secretary of state when Rosatom&rsquo&semi;s purchased Uranium One&comma; was behind the deal&period; To put it simply&comma; she could have aggressively pushed for the sale to appease her donors&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal">Clinton has repeatedly denied these claims and said back I October that &ldquo&semi;it&rsquo&semi;s the same baloney they&rsquo&semi;ve been peddling for years&comma; and there&rsquo&semi;s been no credible evidence by anyone&period; In fact&comma; it&rsquo&semi;s been debunked repeatedly and will continue to be debunked&period;&rdquo&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p class&equals;"MsoNormal"><strong>Author&rsquo&semi;s note&colon;<&sol;strong> We are glad to see a formal investigation be set in motion&period; Hopefully&comma; the investigation will also look into the Russian funds given to the Clinton Foundation and what was exactly Hillary Clinton&rsquo&semi;s role in the deal&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&nbsp&semi;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version